'Oil plot': US embargo on Iran targets Europe?

Published time: January 18, 2012 13:25
Edited time: January 19, 2012 22:10

Tehran believes that Washington is trying to deal a blow to debt-ridden Europe by forcing it to join its embargo on Iranian oil imports. Doing so would be “suicidal” for Europe, Iran says.

On Tuesday, Iran’s Foreign Ministry spokesman Ramin Mehmanparast said the US wanted to drag Europe into joining the sanctions imposed in December because it would make the EU less competitive, reports the Iranian TV channel, Press TV.

The diplomat called on Europeans not to act as America’s client and instead to pursue their own interests in the conflict.

Meanwhile, Iran’s OPEC governor, Mohammad Ali Khatibi, said it would be “economic suicide” for Europe to join the sanctions amid the crisis.

“Regarding the economic crisis in the eurozone, imposing any sanction on Iran's oil will push European countries into a deeper crisis,” Khatibi said as quoted by Mehr news agency. “The European currency is already under pressure because of debt and financing problems facing some of its members.”

Double-edged embargo

Europe is a major importer of Iranian oil, the others being China, Japan, South Korea and India. Southern European countries like Italy, Spain and Greece buy some 13 per cent of all crude they consume from Iran.

The EU’s current plan is to join the oil embargo in a matter of months. The exact date is to be decided at a meeting in Brussels on January 23. The sanctions are expected sometime in early July, according to Financial Times sources.

The grace period is needed to find a replacement fuel source, which may be America’s close ally, Saudi Arabia, which has said it can boost domestic production to compensate for the shortage.

China, which is the largest buyer of Iranian oil, said last week it would not uphold any sanctions against the Islamic Republic unless they are imposed by the UN Security Council. India came up with a similar statement on Wednesday.

South Korea and Japan both voiced their readiness to boycott Iran’s crude, but did not indicate when such a measure might come into force. Japan is particularly vulnerable to energy shortages after the devastating earthquake and tsunami which hit it last year, destroying the Fukushima power plant.

Iran came up with a number of bald statements after Barack Obama implemented the oil embargo in December. Chief among them is its threat to blockade the Strait of Hormuz, a key sea route for Gulf oil tankers, in response to the pressure.

The sanctions are meant to force Tehran into making its nuclear program transparent to foreign inspectors. Iran insists that the program is purely civilian, but many Western nations say it is ultimately pursuing nuclear weapon capabilities. No hard proof of such intentions has ever been produced.

Iran on Wednesday confirmed that it is ready to restart talks on the issue and is waiting for the group of six nuclear mediators to set a date for a meeting.

­Philip Giraldi, an ex-CIA officer who is currently the executive director of the Council for the National Interest think-tank, believes Iran is buying time, basically saying: “There is a high level of belligerency right now, but if we buy time, possibly that will change.”

“The resolve of the European powers to push on this Iranian nuclear issue is higher now,” Giraldi explained. “But if there is a genuine threat to possibly raise oil prices through closing the Strait of Hormuz, then the Europeans who get quite a lot of this oil would begin to reconsider what they are doing.”

Comments (25)

Ssi 02.04.2012 05:39

According to Shirin Shafaie, writing for CASMII Media Watch On Forbes dot com, rrteoper Claudia Rosett wrote that she and President Abdullah Gul of Turkey sipped tea and had a disturbing talk that it resided next to one of the world's roughest neighbors, Iran.For his part, President Gul published a press release stating: Following today's reports by some press organizations that Mr President gave an interview to the Forbes Magazine, the announcement below was deemed necessary: Neither today nor in the past has Mr President ever given any interview to the Forbes Magazine. We respectfully inform the public.' Moral of the story: don't believe everything you read in the MSM, on line, in blogs, anywhere. Check the sources, cross-check information, evaluate the prior acts and credibility of parties presenting the information.Rosett is presently Journalist-in-Reside nce for Foundation for Defense of Democracies, the current project of ideologues formerly associated with neoconservative think tanks and publications, such as Michael Ledeen, Marc Gerecht, James Woolsey ,,, the usual suspects.

0

Undo

jazzbot 31.01.2012 15:26

American dominance of oil extraction and distribution is the ONLY GOAL of any of this. Add into the mix the European business interests (BP, TOTAL etc) then you have a highly militarised, corporate entity with allied European energy behemoths stamping on any fledgling oil- producing country. All conducted under the NATO banner, now the global energy security police, whose remit is to secure oil production for western nations and squeeze out China, India and any of the other next superpowers to be (if China isn't already considered so).   It sickens me it really does. I despise this totalitarian corporate landscape and it worries me that the average american sees nothing of this thanks to their ridiculous 'media'. Terrible, absoloutely terrible.   T he west is bankrupt- in the next ten years the american economy will collapse and take everybody else with it. Cheers tax- dodging money- collecting rich people and your helpful corporate business practices!   It's the same as comunism, exactly the same.

0

Undo

Churchill 24.01.2012 05:54

Yea, very possible. The Elite International Bankers more than likely are targeting the European and North American economies via oil. Any lengthy oil shortage will likely affect  employment and create fuel and food shortages. Yea, U.S. history shows that it wasn't long after WWI ended when the then U.S. Congress passed a resolution stating that WWI was started by International Bankers. Perhaps, that was the last real American Congress that we here in the U.S.A had. I recently heard that the U.S Department of Homeland Security also has suggested that the U.S. should send troops into Nigeria to go after another so called terrorist organization. Obviously, since the War on Terror began and with the current passage of the NDAA in the U.S., it's now a world population under siege irregardless of Nationality, Religion, Race, Creed or Color.

0

Undo

View all comments (25)
Add comment

By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our Posting rules

Log in to comment in full, or comment anonymously under character-limit restriction.

100 Text

– required fields

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us