Loving the bomb: NATO to splurge billions on nuclear weapons overhaul

Published time: May 11, 2012 02:22
Edited time: May 21, 2012 04:29
F-16 fighter jet manufactured by Lockheed Martin Corp (REUTERS/Stringer)

The US is planning to spend $4 billion to upgrade NATO’s Western European nuclear arsenal. The “unnecessary and expensive” initiative is likely to stir new animosity with Russia, a report says.

­The alliance is preparing to replace “dumb” free-fall nuclear bombs with new generation of precision-guided nuclear gravity bombs, reveals a report by the European Leaders Network (ELN), a political think tank. The new bombs will also require new delivery aircraft, the Lockheed Martin F-35, each costing $100 million.

The report “Escalation by Default? The Future of NATO Nuclear Weapons in Europe” is authored by Ted Seay, a former arms control advisor to the US mission at the NATO headquarters in Brussels. It points to the fact that the upgrade will target such countries as Russia and Iran, who will be the most unlikely to be overjoyed with the prospect.

This will increase NATO’s ability to reach targets in Russia with tactical nuclear weapons,” the paper reads. The initiative comes at a time when NATO and Russia are already “locked in a tense stand-off over missile defense.”

This could alienate Russia in particular and worsen the prospects for further negotiations on non-strategic nuclear weapon reductions in Europe as a whole,” the report states.

A nuclear escalation “by default” would only harm security and safety prospects throughout Europe, and should be avoided, the paper concludes.

Commenting on the research, ELN chief Ian Kearns stressed to The Guardian that Washington’s plans for the upgrade are exorbitant.

The planned upgrade of NATO’s tactical nuclear forces in Europe will be expensive and is unnecessary,” said Kearns. “NATO states are fully secure without this additional capability and should be focused on removing all tactical nuclear weapons from Europe, not on modernizing them.

NATO currently possesses around 180 B61 free-fall tactical nuclear bombs stored at bases in Belgium, the Netherlands, Italy, Germany and Turkey. The report states that they are increasingly regarded as obsolete.

In the meantime, a US interceptor successfully downed a ballistic missile as part of a military test in Hawaii, the Pentagon’s Missile Defense Agency stated.

The Raytheon Co-Built Standard Missile-3 (SM-3) Interceptor is a key component in the anti-missile defense (AMD) shields the United States is due to build in Poland, Romania and Turkey. The SM-3 Interceptor is to be deployed to Romania by 2015 and will also be used aboard ships equipped with Lockheed Martin’s Aegis anti-missile combat system.

Russia has been calling for NATO to give legally-binding guarantees that its AMD system would not target Russia, thereby upsetting the global balance of power. NATO and the United States have so far refused to give such guarantees.

Comments (84)

North European (unregistered) 17.05.2012 17:11

I am north european, I think we as European are the ones who should have a say in this matter, I know the politicians here in Europe in those countries where the nukes are may not change the situation, but the vast majority of the people don't want any American nukes in Europe, there is No threat!

Ït is only USA who is dividing and polarizing the world, it is complete nonsense and US game is over now, and for any American coming here and commenting you should stay out, this is Not your business why we in Europe don't want nukes here and why Russians are concerned with all the threats USA is placing out here in the Europe such as the missile defense.
I don't feel at all angry with Russians talking even about preemptive strikes on these AMD, it's the contrary very understandable.
R ussia is much more European than USA maybe want to think, Russia is also interested to develop peaceful trade with Europe which also USA don't like.

Also the Finnish president said last autumn 2011 in according to Finnish news that Finland does Notsee Russia as a threat, well you know Soviet Union and Finland had the vvinter war which caused lots of casualties on both sides, but since then the world have changed and today we have Russia in a new modern form and shape.

It's time for USA to pack their bags and take home all their military stuff, go home and take care of your own borders instead of care for other sovereign countries borders.

Peac e!

+4

Undo

zooropa (unregistered) 14.05.2012 14:19

@blabla (unregistered)....  I'm not taking any advice from someone who cannot even spell 'Blah' !

+1

Undo

blabla (unregistered) 13.05.2012 04:23

RT = Real Threat ... pure indoctrine comments in here. Come on show more of your intelligence. You guys are always a laugh! And everyone knows better then the one before. Post profileration...looo ooooool - better post profileration then you guys spreading kids.

0

Undo

View all comments (84)
Add comment

By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our Posting rules

Log in to comment in full, or comment anonymously under character-limit restriction.

100 Text

– required fields

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us