Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.


​‘Poroshenko promised war until liberation of Ukraine’

Published time: July 01, 2014 02:45
Ukraine President Petro Poroshenko.(AFP Photo / Patrick Hertzog)

President Poroshenko continues to lie, blaming self-defense militias of Donetsk and Lugask for violating the ceasefire. This contradicts documented cases of Kiev's continuous assaults on civilians in the area, foreign affairs expert Nebojsa Malic told RT.

RT:How do you think the European leaders feel about Poroshenko's decision, considering their peace efforts when the truce was in effect?

Nebojsa Malic: I think this has been entirely expected. I suspected something like this would happen following the signing of the deal with the EU. President Poroshenko's speech tonight was a war-mongering one. He essentially promised a war until the final liberation of Ukraine. And he promised to hunt down all those he called bandits and marauders. So there was not a single conciliatory note in it. It is very disappointing from a standpoint of reasonable people, but I would not think for a second that the EU was not expecting this.

RT: Ukraine's president said there could still be a ceasefire if anti-government forces follow his peace plan. Is that a real possibility at this point?

NM: Not in the least. His proposal was not a peace plan, it was essentially a demand for unconditional surrender, offering zero guarantees for the people fighting for self-determination that they would have any of their legitimate demands met by the government in Kiev. There is absolutely no chance for the rebels to take the so-called peace plan into advisement, let alone consideration.

RT: What else does Washington want Russia to do? Moscow has already invited Ukrainian border guards and OSCE staff to be stationed on its side of the border.

NM: I don’t think Washington will stop blaming Russia until the very last person refusing to recognize a Nazi Ukrainian state is either dead or in prison. I think the whole process has been geared towards blaming Russia for the National Guard murdering people opposed to the junta. Honestly, Russia is not really involved in this. This is between the junta in Kiev, the people in Donbass, and Western powers backing the junta in Kiev.

I find the whole thing – “this is Ukraine's decision and we will respect this” – extremely cynical, because Ukraine's decision in November was not to sign the deal with the EU. And the US and the EU did not respect that. In fact, they basically set their puppets forth to take over power in the February coup. So this is just extreme cynicism.

RT: President Poroshenko says his forces would never attack civilians and residential areas. So who could be behind the constant bombing? We just heard from two eyewitnesses who are sheltering from explosions in Kramatorsk...

NM: Well, someone is obviously lying. If President Poroshenko is making a statement that is obviously not true to its face, then I think it is obvious who was lying. If we have documented instances that troops loyal either to the government in Kiev or to oligarchs, the Right Sector leaders – they are all on the same side – if we have documented instances of them bombing civilians and murdering the innocent, I do not see why we should take President Poroshenko at his word.

Comments (27)


FULLMETALJACKET 02.07.2014 12:31

This Guy needs to be stopped early doors. West Ukraine are one angry bitter animal - they have nothing left in the locker but murder, US has to stop encouraging this anger with their retarded comments on the events. Unfortunately there are still people who listen to that stupid woman! Just pay zero attention to them. Can we find someone who cares about people getting killed for nothing. We need a savior - not Russia!


Terry Ross 01.07.2014 19:58

Alex 01.07.2014 19:44

@Terry Ross

None of the 'credentials' you listed qualifies him as expert. Just this statement alone discredits him altogether: 'I don’t think Washington will stop blaming Russia .......


On the contrary . Your view is the US view. This is the view of a press secretary who refuses to take the word of UN inspectors on the ground in UA, the view that treats a press release from a coup government as fact, and a view that regards ISIS as a terrorist group in one country and a US proxy army in another.

No , I would prefer an honest and clear view such as article.


Terry Ross 01.07.2014 19:49

Mcsymm McSymm 01.07.2014 18:50

Terry, you don't understand US don't want to rebuild UA they want hot spot near Rossia. War to the end. I started to realize it would be everybody's end.


Who said anything about rebuilding? No, this amount is simply to allow them to retain the narrative that they are putting out to the world.

The alternative would be to have Ukraine default . However while RU gas passes through UA, the EU cannot allow that to occur. Neither can the US as they would lose their puppet. So they just keep paying the UA bills. Default or South Stream, which is first?

View all comments (27)
Add comment

Authorization required for adding comments

Register or



Show password


or Register

Request a new password


or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:


or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile



New password

Retype new password

Current password



Follow us

Follow us