Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.


‘West backed Ukrainian extremists to get rid of Yanukovich’

Published time: March 09, 2014 13:57

Anti-government protesters clash with riot police at Independence Square in Kiev February 19, 2014 (Reuters / Vasily Fedosenko)

Download video (29 MB)

When the West realized they could not get rid of President Viktor Yanukovich through peaceful demonstrations, they brought in the mob, journalist and writer Christine Stone has told RT.

Leaders of far right groups like Dmitry Yarosh in the Ukraine are useful to the West because their existence allows them to back more moderate political figures and save face, Christine Stone, who acted as an observer at Ukraine's presidential election during the Orange revolution a decade ago, told RT.

RT: What do you make of the decision by the leader of the Ukrainian far-right group, Dmitry Yarosh, to run for President – do you think he stands a chance?

CS: No, I don’t think he stands a chance. But he serves a very useful purpose for the West in that when he is soundly beaten by “moderates” like Yulia Timoshenko or Vitaly Klitchko – they will be able to appoint who the sensible and moderate Ukrainian voter “wants”. So I think he serves a purpose in this forthcoming election, assuming it takes place as predicted.

RT: Russia's Foreign Minister said the West was aware of the influence radical groups have on the interim Ukrainian government, yet prefers to stay silent on that issue. Do you believe that's the case - and if so, why?

CS: I think the West has used extremists in various wars and upsets that have been caused in the last 20 years or so. Originally in Georgia in 1991, the mafia helped chase Zviad Gamsakhurdia away from power. Similarly in Syria and Libya extremists were used – in Syria’s case unsuccessfully, at least so far – to break the Assad government, and to get rid of Colonel Muammar Gaddafi.

So, I think what happened in Ukraine was when they realized they weren’t able to shift Yanukovich and his government through peaceful demonstration, they had to call upon the mob, the mafia, to bring this about – in this case of course the far right. So I think they are aware of what’s gone on and I’m afraid they have been fully involved.

RT: The West seems to be rushing to assure Ukraine it will be welcome in the EU and NATO. What's in it for Europe and the US?

CS: Obviously in terms of NATO it means the West and its forces will be one step nearer the Russian border. So there is a lot to gain there. As far as the EU is concerned, it’s a slightly more nuanced state of affairs.

I think it’s very unlikely with things as they stand that Ukraine will become a member of the EU. But, it is not impossible if the West in any way felt they were backed against a wall they could hurry them in, or at least hurry a western Ukraine in. That would cause enormous problems, particularly for member states like Britain, which have taken in thousands of people from Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union over the past ten years.

I think the prospect on the ground for Ukraine entering the EU for many member states would be fairly dramatic and unwelcome.

Comments (7)


dianne blue 09.03.2014 18:37

The Ukrainian people are not dumb and they don't forget. Putin can try to rewrite history but you can't. What The Soviet Union did in the past to Ukraine was criminal. Putin wants the Soviet Union back.


Dipak Bose 09.03.2014 17:52

Russia should take over the entire Ukraine and allow referendum area by area to determine who want to join Ukraine 1, which will stay with Russia and Ukraine 2, which will join the West. Thus Ukraine will be partitioned. The West cannot object against this democratic process.


Regula 09.03.2014 17:24

ron humphreys 09.03.2014 16:41

B y my guess a civil war is quite likely.


I think there will be a show-off between Yatsenyuk who has little chance of being elected and Tymoshenko and Klitschko. The US may prefer Yatsenyuk because he is corrupt and therefore not a danger to the US's criminal methods in its foreign policy. The US may therefore prefer a civil war to prevent any elections and keep the status quo. The introduction of US security contractors (Blackwater) points in the same direction: they may well be there to cause turmoil to discourage the Russian speakers, not to prevent it.

View all comments (7)
Add comment

Authorization required for adding comments

Register or



Show password


or Register

Request a new password


or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:


or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile



New password

Retype new password

Current password



Follow us

Follow us