Crimea: Ukraine’s trump card in game with Russia
Published: 12 April, 2009, 02:14
Edited: 20 January, 2010, 05:56
TAGS: Conflict, Russia, Ukraine, Politics
The sleaze war between Ukrainian President Viktor Yushchenko and Prime Minister Yulia Timoshenko has been focusing its attention on the issue of the primarily Russian-inhabited and speaking Crimean peninsula.
Lately, the print media and e-Media controlled by the Bloc of Yulia Timoshenko, has been aggressively popularizing the idea that the Secretariat of Ukrainian president Viktor Yushchenko has been assaulting the state's institutions in order to assume power in the country.
In the first instance, it is expected that, the constitutional court (which is pro-presidential) will confirm the absence of a functioning coalition.
The source, cited by “Obozrevatel” then predicts the dissolution of parliament, its refusal to carry it out and, ultimately, the take-over of power by the president to bring stability into the country.
Crimea
Crimea is the only autonomous republic of Ukraine. The primarily Russian-inhabited and speaking peninsula with the same name is located on the northern coast of the Black Sea. In 1783, Crimea was annexed to the Russian Empire as the result of war with the Turkish Empire. On October 18, 1921, the Crimean Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic was created as part of the Russian SFSR (Soviet Federative Socialist Republic). With the collapse of the Soviet Union, Crimea became part of the newly independent Ukraine, a situation largely unexpected by its population, which was ethnically and culturally Russian for the most part.
The Mass media, that advocates the interests of Timoshenko’s supporters, do not hesitate to share their resources with the Communist party of Ukraine that has been all along criticizing the plans of Yushchenko’s team to introduce direct presidential government in the autonomous republic, by imposing a special ‘public administration’ as a part of the blueprint for constitutional reform.
Earlier, Timoshenko continuously said that “the government would not let the tensions in the Crimea escalate, including the issue of Russia’s Black Sea Fleet based in the region."
Kiev is already actively trying to put its people in top positions in the autonomous republic, by appointing the chief of Crimea’s police without an accord with the Crimean parliament, as is demanded by the constitution of the autonomous republic.
Also, Yulia Timoshenko’s Bloc claims that the ‘shadow’ division of land in Crimea is being controlled by the president’s Secretariat.
“Today, the truth is that mostly the leaders of the ‘shadow’ division of land in Crimea are in Yushchenko's Secretariat, and here in the region we only have the executors,” said Andrey Senchenko, leader of Yulia Timoshenko’s Bloc Crimean department.
“But the president’s chances that ‘his’ new Constitution will be adopted is equal to zero,” he said.
According to party members, how the ‘shadow’ division of land is being done in Crimea explains why the president wants to cut further the powers of the autonomous republic in the new Constitution project.
Senchenko also accused the president’s Secretariat of financing the Crimean Tatar Muslim diaspora to unhinge the situation in the Russian-speaking Crimean peninsula.
Crimea was originally occupied by the Crimean Tatars, an ethnic minority who now make up about 13% of the population. In the 1940s, Stalin deported over 200,000 Tatars, claiming they were Nazi collaborators. After the fall of the Soviet Union, they returned to their homeland to find their land occupied by others. Tatars are now struggling to reclaim land they consider to be theirs, despite the fact they were traditionally nomadic. Land in Crimea is some of the most expensive and sought after in Ukraine. It has no gas, water, or proper roads, but it overlooks the Black Sea.
Ukrainian communists insist that this external change of the principal political power in the region will automatically introduce a fundamental crackdown on democratic institutions, human rights, and liberties which could lead the citizens of Crimea to civil war with the rest of Ukraine.
![]() Flagship of the Russian Black Sea Fleet – Cruiser Moscow |
The deputy states that the president’s Secretariat has been fearlessly pursuing the strategy of a dangerous exacerbation of relations with the Russian Federation to the extent of local armed conflicts.
This campaign is designed to aggravate the conflict between Ukrainian authorities and Russia’s Black Sea Fleet over the lighthouses and other navigating installations in Crimea that the Russian fleet has been using for decades.
Chernovol reflects the Ukrainian president's plans, dating back to the summer of 2008, to provoke an armed encounter between the Russian Navy that would without saying protect these strategic installations, and the Ukrainian military that would be given the order to gain control over the installations at any cost.
Such fratricidal bloodshed would undoubtedly lead to meaningless casualties that would strangely coincide with dissolution of the Ukrainian Parliament.
The deputy concluded that at the last moment, president Yushchenko did not dare to take action.
“Maybe you’ll hear the order of the Supreme Commander-in-Chief, Yushchenko, to the Defence Ministry, or maybe this will be decided by the National Security and Defence Council – to free the navigating installations – lighthouses, over which the trial is underway with Russia. It will be the army that will be engaged in such operation, not the police special forces,” Chernovol then said.

Crimea, lighthouse at Tarkhankut Cape
The smear campaign in the Yushchenko-Timoshenko conflict has been surging up over the last year. The fact that the Russia-Georgia stand-off ended in Georgia’s aggression against South Ossetia in August 2008, and the Russia-Georgia war, in which the Ukrainian servicemen took an active part on the Georgia’s side, correlates with the information about the possibility of the Russia-Ukraine military encounter, and appears to lend credibility to these accusations against the Ukrainian president.
11.04.2009, 22:13
2 comments
Cool Russian optimism towards USAMoscow is optimistic about its relationships with the new US administration though it will take time to regain mutual trust, according to the Russian Foreign Minister. |
‘Saakashvili is a threat to Georgia’ – opposition leaderThe main reason why President Saakashvili should resign is because he’s a threat to Georgia, the opposition leader Nino Burdzhanadze said. He might repeat the same mistakes as in 2007, August 2008 again, she added. |
For as long as Crimean Tatars understand that they are in this game nothing more then a pawn. Nothing new for small people. As for historic grievances, there are a plenty. Tatars came as occupiers once upon a time and --- not a gentile ones at all. The real question today is how to address legally the usurpation of homes and land during Soviet times. Many people were thrown out of their homes, and while some were relocated, others had to go into exile, or find some relatives to take them in. I am hoping that modern Ukraine, as well as Russia, has some means of addressing Soviet grab of private property, equitably for all. Current generations are not guilty of the crimes of the past, and some accommodation is in order to protect their lives and property as well. Unfortunatelly, the drama put out by Timoschenko team does not make sense. Yes, the President is known for manipulating --- or firing --- judges. But this theory of taking over sounds far fetched, even for a reckless person that he is. It is more likely that the drama is directed towards the residents of the region, and attract some votes away from Yanukovich block. Unfortunatelly, Timoschenko does not represent change. She shared "orange" values, until they proved to be disasterous. She then went for politcal survival by insuring that the fight with the Yuschenko is loud and well documented. But her government lacks coherence and strategy. To me, the problem is with her. She looks for political clues, and adjusts her direction. She is a brillian tactitian, but Ukraine needs a good U-turn. Only by electing those who did not hold the reigns of power could do that. Everything else is just putting makeup on a disaster.
"Tatars are now struggling to reclaim land ???they consider??? to be theirs, despite the fact they were traditionally nomadic" It's just like say that citizens of Hungary are nomadic because their ancestors happened to be a nomadic people 1000 years before. It's just a "sovietic" and "imperial" propaganda. The tatars are not nomadic (not from now, but from centuries). Their homeland is Crimea, and their homes are in Crimea. The Russian Empire and CCCP stole their homes and lands. "Crimea was originally ???occupied??? by the Crimean Tatars". Crimea was not occupied by the tatars, but by the Russain Empire in 18 century. Crimea was populated by the Crimean Tatars, and now they are just 13% because of Russian Empire and CCCP policies. Stop lying.













The more I learn about Yulia, the less I like her.