Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.

 

Finland will lose ‘sovereignty’ if joins NATO - Putin

Published time: June 22, 2012 15:36
Edited time: June 22, 2012 19:36
AFP Photo/Carl Court

Saying that Finland will surrender its right to act independently in the event it joins the western military alliance, Putin added that Moscow will respond to deployment of any NATO attack missiles based in the Nordic country.

"The involvement of any country in a military bloc deprives it of a certain degree of sovereignty, and some decisions are made at a different level," the Russian president said at a meeting on Friday with Finnish President Sauli Niinisto.

He compared the situation with what has transpired in the bureaucratic realm concerning Finland’s visa regime.

"The same has occurred over the question of visas, where part of Finland's sovereignty is handed over to the European Union,” the Russian leader noted.

Putin then discussed the threat of Finland militarizing itself under NATO supervision, warning that if “the deployment of attack missiles is approved, Russia will take retaliatory measures.”

The Russian President then asked rhetorically if Russia and Finland really needed such a volatile situation.

“If NATO decides to deploy missile systems, Russia will take retaliatory measures," Putin told reporters after talks with Niinsto. "Russia's retaliatory measures will be guaranteed. But what would we need that for?"

Washington’s determination to construct a missile defense system along Russia’s border in Eastern Europe, and without the participation of Russia, has rocked the so-called reset, threatening to spark another arms race between the two former Cold War rivals.

NATO’s relations with Finland, which shares a lengthy border with Russia, are conducted through the Partnership for Peace framework, which Finland joined in 1994.

According to the western alliance’s website, NATO and Finland actively cooperate on peace and security operations and have developed practical cooperation in many other areas.

Meanwhile, the Russian Chief of the General Staff Nikolai Makarov said earlier this month at an event organized by Finland's National Defence Courses Association at the University of Helsinki that cooperation between Finland and NATO threatens Russian security.

"Cooperation between Finland and NATO threatens Russia's security,” stressed Makarov. “Finland should not be desirous of NATO membership, rather it should preferably have tighter military cooperation with Russia."

Robert Bridge, RT

Comments (156)

T (unregistered) 28.06.2012 23:14

So when next time Russia become week we do fear that you will do same as you did in the past. There is no sense to bid whose human suffering is greater. Violent death of every human being is already lost for humanity and we should do whatever we can to prevent it. Russia suffered from Soviets and Finland suffered also. This is is now opinion of patriot of one country given to patriots of another. In this time when new -ism is showing its dangerous face I do not think that true Finland patriots are my enemy. There is simple way how you will know that your political leaders are patriots. If you country have small or non-existent national debt and borrows no many from IMF you have patriotic leadership. Wish you all best!!!

+1

Undo

T (unregistered) 28.06.2012 22:59

As much as respect Swedish king Charles as able warrior, do not forget that he brought over 44000 of his troops all the way to the Poltava in that war. Standard practice of armies at that time was to extort their need (every need) from conquered territories and people. So suffering give birth to revenge and revenge birth to new suffering. I guess person become complete only when he understand and feel sorry for suffering of his opponents. Thats why I call intolerance when we dismiss other side. I already described war that was fought in 1741 and another started by king Gustav in my previous post. In both of those wars Russia was again between rock and hard place. So there is  main historical pattern in all this writing for Russian side. Whenever in history Russia was in trouble  birds of pray came from north to feast on weak victim and stab  Russia in the back. When Russia was strong we just heard whining that Russia is aggressive . I admit that there was another pattern. Pattern that was recognized by patrotic people of Eastern side  of Sweden Kindom on 1809. That is : Finland was one that took brunt of retaliatory action  by Russian Army for aggressive actions of Stockholm.

0

Undo

T (unregistered) 28.06.2012 22:31

In my second post it should be " There is NO excuse....."

0

Undo

View all comments (156)
Add comment

By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our Posting rules

Log in to comment in full, or comment anonymously under character-limit restriction.

100 Text

– required fields

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us