Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.

 

UK parliamentary report calls for more oversight of intelligence agencies

Published time: May 11, 2014 13:18
Edited time: June 27, 2014 08:09
An aerial image of the Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ) in Cheltenham, Gloucestershire. (Image from www.defenceimagery.mod.uk)

An aerial image of the Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ) in Cheltenham, Gloucestershire. (Image from www.defenceimagery.mod.uk)

The Snowden files have revealed the “embarrassing” state of legal oversight into the British intelligence services, MPs have said. As a result, they have called for a major overhaul to make government bodies accountable for their actions.

A Home Affairs Committee report published Friday sharply criticizes the current system of oversight into and legal accountability of the UK’s intelligence gathering agencies. The report says the lack of oversight reflects badly on the agencies’ accountability and on parliament itself.

“We do not believe the current system of oversight is effective,” the committee’s report says. “The scrutiny of the work of the security and intelligence agencies should be not the exclusive preserve of the Intelligence and Security Committee.”

While the committee accepts the need to limit access to documents of a classified nature, it insists it should be granted powers to take oral evidence from the heads of the security services, including MI5, MI6 and the UK version of the NSA, GCHQ.

In addition, MPs told British newspaper the Guardian that classified files released by former CIA contractor Edward Snowden had shed light on the “embarrassing” oversight procedures still in place.

“The agencies are at the cutting edge of sophistication and are owed an equally refined system of democratic scrutiny,” committee chairman Keith Vaz said. “It is an embarrassing indictment of our system that some in the media felt compelled to publish leaked information to ensure that matters were heard in parliament."

He went on to say that the current system of oversight was developed in a pre-internet era, and as such was now outmoded and obsolete.

The Home Affairs Committee report cites the role of The Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC) as of particular concern, because it is the only body that has oversight over intelligence agencies in the UK. MPs say they want to change the way that people are elected to be part of the ISC and end its monopoly on oversight.

Furthermore, the report calls for an end to the secrecy surrounding the Investigatory Powers Tribunal - the only organization that can investigate individual complaints about UK intelligence agencies.

“It ought to command public confidence in its actions. For there to be public confidence there must first be public understanding of the work of the Tribunal,” said the report, urging that the organization be obliged to publish a detailed annual report on its activities.

This is the first time that members of parliament in the UK have admitted that the classified data released by Edward Snowden could lead to much-needed reform in intelligence practices. Back in October, MI5 Director General Andrew Parker condemned the Snowden leaks and their publication in the British press as a “gift for terrorists.”

The government also sought to stem the spread of the leaks and conducted a raid on the offices of The Guardian in London last year to destroy hard drives with classified data from Edward Snowden.

Comments (3)

 

Drake Chen 12.05.2014 02:40

Marthy you do not have to do that , just cash in your chip , trade if you need to , work and live the way you want .

Running away never solved anything , just don't be a tool anymore , imagine if all the slaves stop going to work , what are they going to do ?

Sure they banned everybody withdrawing money from the bank , it is a capital crime , but if nobody wants to work , what can they do ? Even in china it is a effective means of shutting down the industry .

Just play the bureacratic system you paid tax for it !

 

Drake Chen 12.05.2014 01:23

NSA learned from MI5 , MI5 , like the SAS is much more efficient , in certain ways .

especiall y in the domestic department and infiltration .
So yeah this one can be blaimed in MI5 , that the yanks took the spying of it's own citizens to such big brother level .

but it is hilarious that the ones in power finally realise they were the ones services have the biggest files on .
Like sub rosa movies :p

 

Martin 'Marty' McGartland 11.05.2014 16:03

This has been a long time coming. MI5 have broken the law (because they know they are not accountable to any-one) and they had lied again and again and again. They have been (and continue to be) involved in some of the most serious crimes, wrongdoing, corruption and cover-up that have eve taken place. They then use taxpayers money to cover-up their crimes and or pay off those who have suffered at the hands. There will be many within MI5 (Aka Security Services) who will be very concerned.

Add comment

Authorization required for adding comments

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

OK

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

X

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us

Follow us