Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.

 

UK doctors seek permanent ban on selling cigarettes to those born after 2000

Published time: June 24, 2014 18:08
Edited time: June 27, 2014 07:44
A shopkeeper reaches for a packet of cigarettes in a newsagent in London (Reuters / Suzanne Plunkett)

A shopkeeper reaches for a packet of cigarettes in a newsagent in London (Reuters / Suzanne Plunkett)

British Medical Association (BMA) doctors have voted to demand a permanent ban on selling cigarettes to those born after the millennium – i.e. kids who are currently 14 or under. The group’s ambitious plan is to make British society tobacco free by 2035.

The motion was passed at a meeting on Tuesday.

“It is not expected that this policy will instantly prevent all people from smoking, but [rather it will] de-normalise cigarette smoking,” said London research assistant in academic public health, Dr Tim Crocker-Buqué at the meeting. “The level of harm caused by smoking is unconscionable.”

The decision was made at the British Medical Association's annual representatives' meeting on Tuesday. The doctors’ voting in favor means that the doctors’ union will push for the British government to introduce the ban.

The BMA has previously been successful in its attempts to clampdown on smoking. After votes in 2002 and 2011 bans on smoking in public places and cars carrying children were introduced.

According to Crocker-Buqué, some 100 million people died as a result of tobacco-related illness during the 20th century. He added that nine out of 10 smokers wished they had never started.

He added that teenagers cannot make informed choices about taking up the habit.

“Eighty per cent of smokers start as teenagers as a result of intense peer pressure,” he said. “Smokers who start smoking at age 15 are three times as likely to die of smoking-related cancer as someone who starts in their mid-20s.”

BMA Northern Ireland council chair Paul Darragh – himself formerly a heavy smoker – denounced the cost of addiction:

“As doctors, we see first-hand the devastating effects of tobacco addiction,” he said. He went on to talk about how even after cancer is diagnosed, some patients don’t stop.

Sheila Hollins, chair of the BMA's board of science, said the vote was a step towards helping to prevent children from entering the cycle of taking up smoking. The group has a plan to try and ensure British society is tobacco free by 2035.
However, some criticized the potential move, saying it could pave the way for black-market cigarette sales.

“The potential health risks of those may be even greater than those of legal cigarettes,” said Aberdeen medical student Adrianna Klejnotowska. Birmingham associate specialist in ENT, Yohanna Takwoingi, said that aiming for a total ban was just ‘headline grabbing’ and ‘sensationalist’.

Comments (42)

 

Lucidity 01.07.2014 08:54

Why are people comparing cannabis here & acting like it's more dangerous?

Any research into cannabis will show you that it is not more dangerous than cigarette smoke, if you eat or smoke pure cannabis (With no tobacco) or through a vaporizer, you have practically NO RISK of cancer or life threatening illness coming up. In fact, at small doses daily, you'll even see health benefits (Less chronic pain, less migraines, better sleep, better appetite, no more nausea - if you suffer from it etc.) and people still act like cannabis is a "dangerous drug" rather than something that just relaxes you and helps you feel relief.

 

Michael 30.06.2014 15:21

Ban cigarettes? what a joke.
You can buy a joint and smoke, Maruana, Cannabis, Coke - but no cigarettes.

 

Annie Get Your Gun 29.06.2014 19:12

Ross Martin 26.06.2014 20:55



I swear this site is full of statists. No psychoactive should be illegal. If somebody gets hurt from taking a harmful drug, that's their decision and their fault. Why is it the governments job to protect people from their own stupidity? Keep cigarettes legal. If somebody is dumb enough to smoke and get addicted, then bad health is the natural consequence of their mistake

  


Uh, the pushers are richer than NASA scientists. Are you getting paid to do the psychobabble for the pushers - focus on the stupid users?

View all comments (42)
Add comment

Authorization required for adding comments

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

OK

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

X

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us

Follow us