Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.

 

Utah county follows Cliven Bundy's lead, refuses to recognize federal agencies

Published time: June 19, 2014 04:11
Protest signs are posted along US. highway 170 protesting the closure of thousands of acres of Bureau of Land Management land that has been temporarily closed to round-up illegal cattle that are grazing south of Mesquite Nevada on April 10, 2014 in Mesquite, Nevada. (George Frey/Getty Images/AFP)

Protest signs are posted along US. highway 170 protesting the closure of thousands of acres of Bureau of Land Management land that has been temporarily closed to round-up illegal cattle that are grazing south of Mesquite Nevada on April 10, 2014 in Mesquite, Nevada. (George Frey/Getty Images/AFP)

Utah’s residents have had a contentious history with the federal government when it comes to public lands. Now one county in the state has taken things a step further, passing a resolution refusing to recognize federal agents.

Carbon County, located on the eastern side of Utah and named for the coal deposits in the region, unanimously passed the resolution against federal agents on June 4. The county board of commissioners specially singled out officials from the Bureau of Land Management in its prohibition.

“Accordingly, the Board of Commissioners of Carbon County declares publicly in the interest of the health, safety and welfare of its citizens, that Carbon County does not recognize any attempt by a federal official to try to enforce state or local criminal or civil laws on any lands in Carbon County, including any BLM and Forest Service lands in Carbon County… including federal lands.”

"Any such attempted exercise of law enforcement powers by an official of a land management agency IS NOT RECOGNIZED by Carbon County," the resolution stated (caps in original), "and shall be deemed AN IMMINENT THREAT TO THE HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE OF THE CITIZENS OF CARBON COUNTY."

The resolution also demanded that any federal agent intending to take a law enforcement action "shall first declare his presence and intended action to the Sheriff of Carbon County."

The resolution is the second repudiation of federal authority in Utah since Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy (known as the “last rancher in Clark County, Nevada”) took a stand in a recent showdown against the BLM over his refusal since 1993 to pay fees to the federal government for the right to raise cattle on land his family has ranched since the 1870s. In May, residents of the town of Blanding were joined by Bundy supporters as they rode ATVs on BLM land that has been closed to motorized vehicles since 2007.

"People are hugely frustrated," San Juan County Commissioner Bruce Adams said to the Deseret News of the ATV ride. "People are ready to draw a line in the sand, they're ready to push back."

Although some in Utah see the board of commissioners’ move as not the most logical one (“Carbon County now joins LaVerkin in the tinfoil hat world. LaVerkin, you might recall, once passed a resolution banning the U.N. from the southern Utah city,” Paul Rolly wrote in a Salt Lake Tribune op-ed), Utah’s frustrations with the federal government aren’t limited to Blanding and Carbon County.

On Wednesday, state lawmakers vented their frustrations about grazing cutbacks and renegade federal law enforcement agents during a committee meeting with top BLM and Forest Service Officials, the Salt Lake Tribune reported.

"We as a state are heavily dependent on what you do in managing these lands. … It is very, very important we have a working relationship," said Rep. Mike Noel, the chairman of the House’s Natural Resources, Agriculture and Environment Committee, according to the Tribune.

Noel represents seven rural counties, and said his constituents “have a very, very difficult time understanding some of the decisions that come down.”

Utah Lt. Gov. Spencer Cox said the BLM arbitrarily canceled its contracts with county sheriffs' departments on the premise they were "illegal," but Utah was the only state in which that action was taken.

Rep. Ken Ivory lambasted the BLM for an excessive display of force by federal agents at the Bundy ranch. "There were hundreds of agents armed heavily with Tasers and attack dogs going in to collect a fee or fine. We have not seen that before," he said.

Even before Utah’s protests stemming from the Bundy standoff, residents of the Beehive State viewed the federal government with suspicion.

"It is fair to say that the vast majority of people here are frustrated with the federal presence here," Bill Boyle, a lifelong resident and publisher of the San Juan Record newspaper told the Denver Post in 2011.

Back then, a federal raid by 150 armed agents took place against 16 Blanding residents, the Post reported. The raid focused on violations of the 1906 Antiquities Law and the 1979 Archeological Resources Protection Act for looting Ancestral Puebloan artifacts, the Department of Justice said at the time.

But Blanding’s citizens contended that the BLM was being hypocritical. According to the Post at the time, the BLM “has been known to smash pots and rock objects when there was no place to store them. And BLM and US Forest Service agents were implicated in one of the recent search-warrant affidavits for taking and selling items themselves.”

Federal raids also occurred in the area in the 1980s.

Comments (26)

 

Robert Williams 04.07.2014 18:46

Well folks, I have watched this environmentalist movement for years now and have come to a conclusion Man is part of the environment, and he will continue to be, so if you think the environment must be protected then try protecting my right to be part of it.

 

Edmundo Santiago 20.06.2014 22:44

The concept of 'owning' land is something introduced and today no one really 'owns' the land other than the government... for if you fail to pay your property taxes, the government has the power to remove you and give the land to someone who will pay the tribute... er I mean the taxes.

Thus why I state it as "People's Right to Land," for how else can people feed themselves and utilize the land if they don't have a right to it?

If the people have no right to land, then they are mere slaves living on someone's plantation.

We can move on to the discussion of the occupation of native lands by colonialists later.

 

Edmundo Santiago 20.06.2014 22:39

Don Cordell 20.06.2014 05:51

I happen to be related to Mr. Bundy... in Perquimans and Pasquotank Co's... who settled there about 1670... were noted for honesty and respect for legal laws... constantly fighting for citizens rights. The Federal leaders made treaties with the native Americans, and then immediately ignored every treaty.

  


Mr. Cordell, your thoughts on the people whose land was stolen from them.

Also, your thoughts on the People's Right to Land, not ownership, but right to land... many folks displaced and paying tribute for what God made for all to use in order to survive.

View all comments (26)
Add comment

Authorization required for adding comments

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

OK

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

X

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us

Follow us