Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.

 

Cops used cell phone surveillance tool 200 times without court’s permission

Published time: March 04, 2014 21:10
Reuters / Lucas Jackson

Reuters / Lucas Jackson

​The American Civil Liberties Union wants to learn more about any secret surveillance gadgets used by Florida law enforcement agencies after uncovering proof that police there relied on one type of spy tool upwards of 200 times without permission.

Nathan Freed Wessler, a staff attorney for the ACLU’s Speech, Privacy and Technology Project, wrote on Monday this week that his organization has filed public records requests with nearly 30 police and sheriffs’ departments across the Sunshine State in hopes of having documents unsealed that would disclose how those agencies use certain surveillance tools to track down cell phones.

Police agencies across the country are increasingly relying on specialized devices known as “stingrays” to conduct investigations, but the powerful tools aren’t discussed in public that much. Much to the ACLU’s surprise, however, officers in Florida have been using such tools without even the oversight or authorization of the court, raising new concerns about exactly how rampant this type of surveillance actually is.

When implemented properly, a stingray can mimic the behavior of a cell phone tower like the ones managed by major telecommunication companies, tricking mobile devices into sending signals that could then be used to track down a handheld phone to a physical location within just a few feet.

Privacy advocates aren’t pleased by these devices, though, since they allow law enforcement to suck up huge chunks of information about potentially thousands of innocent people at once. And according to the ACLU’s Wessler, Florida police have been playing with these gadgets just about completely unchecked.

“As revealed in a recent opinion of a Florida appeals court, Tallahassee police used an unnamed device — almost certainly a stingray — to track a stolen cell phone to a suspect’s apartment,” he wrote on Monday this week.

A stingray-like device absolutely aided the police in finding that stolen cell phone and the suspect responsible, and the cops raided the residence in order to make an arrest. Wessler wrote that they didn’t bother obtaining a warrant in order to enter the apartment, though, nor did they ask for the court’s authorization to set up a fake cell tower.

In fact, Wessler revealed, the fact that the Tallahassee Police Department actually had such a device at their disposable was something that was supposed to be kept under wraps.

“Police opted not to get warrants authorizing either their use of the stingray or the apartment search. Incredibly, this was apparently because they had signed a nondisclosure agreement with the company that gave them the device,” he wrote. “The police seem to have interpreted the agreement to bar them even from revealing their use of stingrays to judges, who we usually rely on to provide oversight of police investigations.”

This was far from an isolated incident, though. Wessler wrote that only when the case was appealed later on was it revealed that TPD turned on their stingray at least 200 times to collect information, without once ever asking for a warrant from a judge or magistrate.

“Potentially unconstitutional government surveillance on this scale should not remain hidden from the public just because a private corporation desires secrecy. And it certainly should not be concealed from judges,” Wessler wrote. “That’s why we have asked the Florida court that originally sealed the transcript to now make it available to the public. And that’s also why we have asked police departments throughout Florida to tell us whether they use stingrays, what rules they have in place to protect innocent third parties from unjustified invasions of privacy, and whether they obtain warrants from judges before deploying the devices.”

Comments (8)

 

mergon 13.06.2014 09:28

Augmented reality !
Just Google spy equipment UK , it will give you an understanding of what is available ,they only show some of the stuff, but if you are a serious buyer they have the under the counter stuff that they sell to governments and the like , ever wondered why an mp or minister pays appx £2000 for mobile phone ?

 

j.innes 05.03.2014 16:06

Well think of what they "accidentally&q uot; sweep up. I bet if you look at police departments in state Capitals you would find this being "conveniently&q uot; deployed. A good way to take out the opposition of the military/police even before they can organize. 9% of Florida's voting age population is disenfranchised. This of course are mostly minority populations. Turns out in the land of the "Free" Free means free to cheat in a most undemocratic way. Look at the history and ask, why? Here is a mirror. It is a reflection of what?

 

mergon 05.03.2014 10:13

To protect and serve ] but it does not say the public ,with the police being turned into a para military organisation using ex military equipment Its turned into Blackstone style law in your county .

The government take taxes of the public and buy military equipment with it , they then sell the surplus to the police who are supposed to protect the public ,as it happens a lot of money is being made by the government in supplying the police with equipment that they have paid for with their taxes anyway ,

Its the corporate American way every one gets a deal its $$$$$$$ all round , and dead people dont matter !

View all comments (8)
Add comment

Authorization required for adding comments

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

OK

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

X

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us

Follow us