Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.

 

CIA workers intimidated into silence over Benghazi attack – report

Published time: May 01, 2013 11:59
A protester reacts as the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi is seen in flames during a protest by an armed group said to have been protesting a film being produced in the United States September 11, 2012.(Reuters / Esam Al-Fetori)

A protester reacts as the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi is seen in flames during a protest by an armed group said to have been protesting a film being produced in the United States September 11, 2012.(Reuters / Esam Al-Fetori)

Several State Department and CIA workers were allegedly intimidated into keeping silent over the attacks on the US diplomatic mission in Benghazi last year. The unnamed officials feel if they testify their livelihood and their jobs could be put at risk.

“If you are going to take away somebody's job or living then it's a threat,” said Victoria Toensing, one of the officials’ attorneys to Fox. She did not describe how the intimidation occurred but stressed that it was done in a “very subtle way.”

She went on to stress that her client had invaluable information to share with Congress regarding the attack that killed the American Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three of his aides last September. Moreover, Toensing signaled that her client also had information about the days following the attack and the way in which it was dealt with by US intelligence.

“What the State Department has to do is clear the lawyer for the information to come out. So even if my client is a witness they will only get half a story,” Toensing stated. She hinted that other employees had not come forward with their testimonies because they were afraid of the consequences. She described it as “frightening” that cooperating with congressional investigators could end a career in one fell swoop.

Republicans have repeatedly attacked the Obama Administration’s handling of the attack on the diplomatic mission in Benghazi, alleging security lapses in the run up to the incident and attempts at a cover-up.

The president addressed the claims on Tuesday during a press conference, maintaining that he was aware of no such reports of intimidation among CIA employees.

"I'm not familiar with this notion that anybody's been blocked from testifying," President Obama said.

The State Department echoed the president’s words, stating it was unaware of any requests of security clearance for private attorneys for employees.

"The State Department would never tolerate or sanction retaliation against whistleblowers on any issue, including this one,"
deputy agency spokesman Patrick Ventrell said.

Obama’s government has always maintained it treated the incident with the utmost transparency. There have been eight hearing into the matter thus far, as well as a testimony from former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in January.

Conjecture has been rife since the attack in September over whether or not the White House had information in advance on Benghazi. The Obama Administration initially insisted that it was a knee-jerk reaction to an inflammatory American-made video, ‘Innocence of the Muslims’, which sparked protests across the Muslim world.

However, it was later suggested that the attack may have been orchestrated by an affiliate of Al-Qaeda and it was labeled as an act of terrorism rather than a spontaneous reaction to the video.  

An independent inquiry from The Accountability Review Board concluded that the State Department was woefully unprepared for the attack on the consulate and that failures in leadership and management had led to the blunder. The probe stopped short at personally blaming Clinton.

Clinton’s private emails to former presidential aide Sidney Blumenthal regarding the Benghazi attack were leaked to RT in March by a hacker using the alias ‘Guccifer’.

Comments (21)

 

Ivan Arana 21.05.2013 20:29

expect increased terrorism world wide world war 3 global war on terrorism or global war on the poor semper fi to the constitution one shot one kill.....grunt proof

Anonymous user 08.05.2013 22:36

'Yes we can', but if you try to tell- 'you'd better not'. Nice one Barry.

Anonymous user 02.05.2013 00:35

Stevens was a known Pedophile who had people soliciting "locals" to sell their boys..that's why..duh

View all comments (21)
Add comment

Authorization required for adding comments

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

OK

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

X

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us

Follow us