Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.

 

​Border agents criticized for use of deadly force in report agency shielded from Congress

Published time: February 27, 2014 22:43
AFP Photo / Mark Ralston

AFP Photo / Mark Ralston

US Border Patrol agents have purposely stepped in front of moving cars to justify shooting at drivers and used firearms against people throwing rocks across the border from Mexico, according to an independent review of 67 cases that resulted in 19 deaths.

A report by law enforcement experts chastised the Border Patrol for substandard investigations following cases where US agents fired their weapons. The review panel also said that it could not determine whether the Border Patrol “consistently and thoroughly reviews” instances where deadly force was used.

The report was completed in February 2013, but the US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) – the Border Patrol’s parent agency that commissioned the independent review – has thus far blocked the contents from public view. Even US House and Senate oversight committees could not compel the agency to hand over the entire report. The Los Angeles Times has now obtained the full report and the CBP’s response.

The review was conducted by the Police Executive Research Forum, a nonprofit research and policy organization in Washington. The group was offered Border Patrol case files on 67 shooting incidents from January 2010 to October 2012.

The researchers found evidence of border agents at times deliberately blocking a car’s path in order to shoot at drivers who were attempting to avoid arrest but were not a direct threat to anyone.

"It is suspected that in many vehicle shooting cases, the subject driver was attempting to flee from the agents who intentionally put themselves into the exit path of the vehicle, thereby exposing themselves to additional risk and creating justification for the use of deadly force," the report reads. There were times when "passengers were struck by agents' gunfire."

To avoid creating danger where there is little, the report recommends agents be trained to “get out of the way… as opposed to intentionally assuming a position in the path of such vehicles."

Authors suggest border agents not shoot at moving vehicles, just as most US law enforcement are instructed, unless deadly force is being used “by means other than a moving vehicle.”

The internal report obtained by the Times did not detail the number of shooting incidents in response to rock throwing, yet some accounts have been reported by local news.

For instance, in September 2012 Guillermo Arevalo Pedroza, 36, was shot and killed while attending a family picnic on the Mexican side of the Rio Grande River. Officials said the border agent that shot from a patrol boat claimed he was hit by rocks.

A US Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General report in September found that border agents shot at rock throwers 22 times in fiscal year 2012, though it did not include if there were any casualties. CBP is part of the Department of Homeland Security.

Mexican officials have voiced frustration that US border agents who kill Mexicans are rarely disciplined, or, if they are, such investigations are kept hidden for years after completion.

In a recent congressional hearing, the CBP was criticized for not disclosing protocols regarding agents’ use of deadly force.

"When a young person throws a rock across the border, toward the border or border agents, some agents respond with a gun and other agents don't respond at all. There seems to be some need for some consistency in the response to these incidents and how we treat it," Sen. Robert Menendez said at a Jan. 15 confirmation hearing for the Obama administration’s nominee to lead CBP, Gil Kerlikowske.

The Border Patrol has started testing “less lethal” weapons like pepper spray, rubber bullets, and Tasers, while instructing new agents on how to deal with violent confrontations, the Times reported. The agency also now tracks shooting incidents in a database to help with crime trends and policy adjustments.

The research group offered two main recommendations: prohibit border agents from firing on vehicles unless their lives are in grave danger, and barring agents from shooting at anyone throwing objects that cannot inflict serious physical injury.

The CBP’s response rejected both suggestions. The agency said a ban on firing at rock throwers “could create a more dangerous environment” given agents often operate in desolate areas where taking cover is next to impossible. The agency added that announcing a Border Patrol policy to not use such force would embolden drug smugglers to attempt to run over agents.

Border Patrol Chief Mike Fisher told the AP in November the CBP viewed the recommendations as “very restrictive.”

"We shouldn't have carve-outs in our policy and say, except for this, except for that," Fisher said. "Just to say that you shouldn't shoot at rock-throwers or vehicles for us, in our environment, was very problematic and could potentially put Border Patrol agents in danger."

Yet Jeh Johnson – head of the Homeland Security Department – is “reconsidering the response” to the report’s suggestions, a department official told the Times on Wednesday.

Comments (6)

 

Wilson Boozer 28.02.2014 17:05

And we're doing all this to keep the "terrorists&quo t; out? It seems that they are already here, and wearing the US Border Patrol uniforms!

 

Mac 28.02.2014 04:52

I think it is a moot point, the bus has left the station...a few years back. Each illegal is a future voter for the Democratic Party. All the moaning and complaining, and what if this, and why not that is all for naught. The boarder will not be closed, and amnesty will be the law of the land before too long. Remember, they were supposed to fix it when Regean was in office.

 

starstuff 28.02.2014 02:59

[quote name='RYBY' time='28.02.2014 00:48']
Notice how many TSA agents, border partol agents , IRS and state collector's that are immigrant's???
[ /quote]

My well educated guess is 0% I live in Texas and I know this stuff. You are confusing ethnicity with citizenship, many agents are Hispanics but they were born in the US. The constitution of the US say that ANYBODY born in the US is a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN.

Be sides to apply for this type of job it helps (100% acceptance) if you have a military background. In my family we speak German and also Spanish so that makes me an immigrant?

View all comments (6)
Add comment

Authorization required for adding comments

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

OK

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

X

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us

Follow us