Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.

 

California keeps circumcision legal

Published time: October 04, 2011 19:28
Edited time: October 04, 2011 23:28
Circumcision is still legal in California

Circumcision is still legal in California

California Governor Jerry Brown is forcing foreskin fanatics to take their penis protests everywhere.

While San Francisco activists against genital mutilation have lobbied to have lobbing off foreskin a punishable offense, Gov. Brown has thwarted their attempt by banning local authorities from attempting to outlaw circumcision.

Anti-circumcision advocates had managed to collect thousands of signatures in an attempt to outlaw the practice except in instances of medical emergency, but Gov Brown managed to snip the sanction from hitting the book by signing a bill they will keep local lawmakers from banning circumcision. If they have had their way, circumcision would have been deemed an act of genital mutilation and could have carried a fine of $1,000 and a year in a jail.

The legislation making the medical procedure a misdemeanor was expected to go before voters in San Francisco this November. Brown’s office confirmed over the weekend, however, that he had signed a legislation that will keep local authorities from passing their own restrictions on the right.

Explicitly, the bill signed Sunday states that city and county authorities cannot prohibit or restrict “the practice of male circumcision, or the exercise of a parent’s authority to have a child circumcised.”

"The law reaffirms that municipalities cannot take away parents' rights to make medical and religious decisions for their own children," the Jewish Community Relations Council's Abby Porth commented to the AFP. Porth has been opposed to the circumcision ban since it began picking up steam earlier this year. In a statement earlier in 2011, Porth called intactivists’ initiatives “a hate fueled campaign intended to curtail civil liberties in San Francisco.”

Those on the other side of the argument, deemed “intactivists,” say that they will have their way someday, though. "Human rights takes a long time for people to understand," Lloyd Schofield, the San Francisco intactivist that had lobbied against circumcision, said to the AFP. Intactivists have been rallying against circumcision with the argument that the practice is "painful and damaging surgery to an unwilling patient” and lacks medical benefits.

To the San Francisco Chronicle, intactivist Matthew Hess added that the block is a “big step backwards.”

“Circumcision is elective surgery that an adult should be allowed to choose for himself," said Hess.

Comments (5)

 

FuriousD 01.07.2014 07:27

Neo-fascism "We decide how you can raise your children"
H alves rate of STI's... "No medical benefits"
S tupid self-obsession knows no bounds


 

lucy suarez 30.06.2014 18:49

Thanks god I live in NY

Anonymous user 07.04.2013 02:39

rge only thing wrong with circumcision is that there are some males that aren't---grooooooooo oooooos

View all comments (5)
Add comment

Authorization required for adding comments

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

OK

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

X

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us

Follow us