California nuclear plant shut down over radioactive leaks

Published time: February 01, 2012 18:23
Edited time: February 01, 2012 22:36
San Onofre nuclear plant, California

A leak at a Southern California nuclear facility that regularly provides power to roughly 1.4 million households has caused the plant to shut down a reactor.

Despite officials insisting that everything will be perfectly alright at the San Onofre nuclear site, this is not the first time as of late that power plants have raised serious questions about their safety in America.

A reactor at the San Onofre nuclear power station was halted Tuesday afternoon after personnel at the plant identified a leak in a steam generator tube. Gil Alexander, a spokesman for Southern California Edison, explains to Reuters that the reactor will remain offline for at least a couple of days.

"We don't expect any impact on our customers tomorrow," Alexander adds, yet notes that the reactor in question usually churns out around 1,100 megawatts of electricity to one of the biggest metropolitan areas in the country.

The shutdown is forcing officials to halt operations in Unit 3 of the plant. Unit 2 of the station was already offline at the time of the incident, of which officials say was the result of routine maintenance and upgrades.

Speaking of the alleged minuteness of the leak, Alexander tells the Los Angeles times that “it wouldn’t even qualify as the least severe” infraction under guidelines set up by the United States’ Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Regardless, the plant, located south of San Clemente, California, reported the incident to them anyway.

As it would be, the regulations in place for American facilities are actually more lax than one would expect.

"While the NRC and the nuclear industry have been reassuring Americans that there is nothing to worry about – that we can do a better job dealing with a nuclear disaster like the one that just happened in Japan – it turns out that privately NRC senior analysts are not so sure," Edwin Lyman, a Union of Concerned Scientists nuclear expert, explained to Reuters last year. Even after the nuclear disaster at Japan’s Fukushima plant in early 2011 raised questions internationally over safety regulations, the United States has done little to improve conditions since.

The reason, some say, is that the regulations in place don’t call for them. In a report conducted by the Associated Press last year, it was revealed that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission has repeatedly weakened safety requirements for facilities, regularly allowing antiquated plants to continue operating by making it easier to pass tests in lieu of actually upgrading the facility. The AP found that of the 104 nuclear plants operating in America last year, 66 of them had been re-licensed for an additional 20 years of service. The vast majority of plants in the US, however, are already older than a quarter of a century.

San Onofre, located around 70 miles south of Los Angeles, is one of those.

“I think we need nuclear power, but we can’t compromise on safety. I think the vulnerability is on these older plants,” engineer Richard T. Lahey Jr., formerly with General Electric Co, told the AP last year. Although one-fifth of the nation’s power comes from nuclear plants — and much of Southern California relies on the San Onofre, loosened regulations are repeatedly putting much of America and the world at risk.

The San Onofre facility was opened in the late 1960s and has been upgraded since then, although not without incident. Engineers at the Bechtel Group Inc. of San Francisco installed a 420-ton nuclear reactor vessel at the facility in 1977, only to be publically humiliated when it was realized that the plant was constructed backwards.

Authorities at San Onofre say that the leak has yet to spread outside of the plant, but should that happen the consequences could be catastrophic. The San Onofre facility is only a stone’s throw away from the Pacific Ocean.

The AP adds in their analysis that roughly 113 alerts at the nation’s nuclear facilities since 2005 can be blamed in part on aging. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission itself reported in 2008 that 70 percent of potentially serious safety problems stem from “degraded conditions.”

Within the last year, a nuclear plant outside of Washington, DC was shut-down after concern of damage to reactors. In August 2011, officials questioned authorities at Vermont’s Yankee nuclear plant after water samples in a nearby stream tested positive for a carcinogenic chemical.

Comments (9)

Pro-nuc 05.04.2012 20:16

How can we trust the information in this story?  For example, you say that San Onofre was installed backwards.  That is patently false.  I won't tell the you real situation.  I'm going to make you do your homework.  Also, there are no nuclear plants outside of Washington DC.  Calvert Cliffs and North Anna are about 60-70 miles away.  Lastly, I'd like you to name a single industrial facility of any kind that hasn't put contamination into the soil around it.  The question becomes one of degree.  That is, how much is a danger to the environment or public health as compared to how much was released.  When the release is well below the danger threshold (as in VT), it is something to be corrected, but not to cause panic.  If you applied that kind of thinking to the rest of your life, you would not be driving once anyone had an accident of any kind anywhere.  Just try to live like that!   The bottom line is that we need nuclear more than we need off-shore oil drilling or fracking for natural gas.  Face it, wind and solar will never be enough (even if you are willing to install hundreds of thousands of windmills and hundreds of square miles of solar panels...don't forget the many miles of HV transmission lines you now also need).  Choose your poison.  I'm choosing nuclear.  I trust the nuclear industry and the NRC much more than I trust the oil & gas industry and its regulators.  The U.S. is way ahead of the rest of the world.  If the authors of this story were capable of understanding what is involved and did real journalism, they would find out that fact.  Instead, this is just another anti-nuke propoganda piece.   It's funny how anti-nukes complain about rates and lax regulation at the same time.  No industry exists where you can have both!!   By the way, did you happen to read that Los Alamos residents are the healthiest in the country?  I guess radiation exposure isn't all bad.  

0

Undo

Smithy 02.02.2012 11:52

Google radioactive clouds in Australia
The amount of radiation down under is going up

+5

Undo

Jo 02.02.2012 09:33

Just wait for an earthquake to it. "the big one" and this thing will become catastrophic alright.

+8

Undo

View all comments (9)
Add comment

By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our Posting rules

Log in to comment in full, or comment anonymously under character-limit restriction.

100 Text

– required fields

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us