Security fears? Chicago G8 Summit canceled, relocated to Camp David

Published time: March 05, 2012 21:25
Edited time: March 07, 2012 08:37
AFP Photo / Mandel Ngan

Amid concerns over thousands of protestors descending on Chicago, Illinois for the G-8 Summit this spring, the event has been moved to the presidential compound at Camp David, Maryland, around an hour outside of Washington.

Leaders from the United States, Russia, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the UK and European Union were expected to arrive in Chicago this May for the annual meeting of the world’s largest economies. Protesters also had plans for the Windy City, however, and demonstration groups including Occupy Wall Street offshoots had begun orchestrating events to coincide with the meeting. Now barely two months before the event is slated to occur, the G-8 Summit is being moved outside of Chicago to Camp David, a suburban city outside of the US capital that serves as a historic retreat locale for America’s commander-in-chief.

"In May, the United States looks forward to hosting the G-8 and NATO Summits. To facilitate a free-flowing discussion with our close G-8 partners, the president is inviting his fellow G-8 leaders to Camp David on May 18-19 for the G-8 Summit, which will address a broad range of economic, political and security issues,” reads a statement released Monday by the White House.

After the G-8 Summit, the NATO meeting is expected to continue as planned in Chicago on May 20 through 21.

In the past, these high-profile meetings of the minds have attracted massive demonstrations, with the 2010 G-20 Summit in Toronto resulting in the largest mass arrest in the history of the entire country of Canada. In recent weeks, the Apartment Building Owners and Managers’ Association of Chicago began a series of presentations in which it explained how building managers could effectively handle riots, protests, tear gas and bomb threats.

Camp David has served as a retreat for every president since Franklin Roosevelt went into office in the 1940s and has hosted foreign dignitaries such as Winston Churchill, Margaret Thatcher and Anwar al-Sadat. Come this spring, however, it will serve as a meeting place for more than just a few heads of state. Obama, Cameron, Merkel and Sarkozy are just a few of the names that are expected on this year’s guest list — and don’t expect there to be many more. Camp David is normally subjected to heightened security standards, and this spring’s G8 Summit won’t come as any exception. For protesters hoping to picket outside the grounds — a mass demonstration would be unlikely.

Coincidently, a new bill drafted by Congress, HR 347, will make it a federal offense to trespass on the grounds of any place granted Secret Service. If approved, the NATO Summit in Chicago will fall into this jurisdiction, as will the presidential retreat at Camp David. What does that mean for protesters? Even if you’re in the proximity of the premises, you could be considered a criminal for engaging in any activity that disrupts a governmental event.

Comments (38)

Churchill 11.03.2012 10:36

Yea hehehe, they might as well hold it at Camp David (Rockefellow?). It's closer to the United Corporate States of America headquarters(Washing ton DC) and the United Nations in New York, it will make it more convenient for them. Yea, I wonder when that bottomless pit will open up? Here in the U.S. we have many snake pits, Camp David is just one of the more noted ones.

0

Undo

A.C. Luthus 07.03.2012 17:42

The concerns would be that with the 'people potential' and volatility, the re'd be no choice but to implement the latest 1st Ammendment violations recently passed;Obama said he'd not use it (at least before his potential for reelection). That, in combination with the 'no recording/photo/vide o' of police here, _also_ violating our rights to protect ourselves from our 'protectors', would result in a worse situation than the riots a few decades back.
Additionall y, with the wording of the new legis' passed: those under Secret Service protection (aka: instant & moving bubble zones) make any protesting pretty much instantly 'illegal' or even if permitted in absurdly distant 'permitted' zones, easily revocable in the moment for 'safety' reasons.(aka: keep it invisible as possible, even from non-mainstream media).
yep, it was a nice idea, that Constituti on.   

+4

Undo

melnickrj 07.03.2012 07:34

I suggest Guantanamo.  Everyone can get a "real feel" for America while chatting.

+3

Undo

View all comments (38)
Add comment

By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our Posting rules

Log in to comment in full, or comment anonymously under character-limit restriction.

100 Text

– required fields

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us