Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.

 

Congress considers blocking GMO food labeling

Published time: April 09, 2014 20:10
Edited time: April 10, 2014 11:01
AFP Photo / Robyn Beck

AFP Photo / Robyn Beck

A new bill introduced in Congress looks to ban states from implementing their own labeling laws when it comes to food containing genetically engineered ingredients.

According to Reuters, US Rep. Mike Pompeo (R-Kan.) introduced the legislation on Wednesday, which is intended to head off bills in about 24 states that would require companies to inform customers when their food is produced using genetically modified organisms (GMOs). Titled the “Safe and Accurate Food Labeling Act,” the proposal would forbid states from enacting such proposals.

"We've got a number of states that are attempting to put together a patchwork quilt of food labeling requirements with respect to genetic modification of foods," Pompeo told Reuters. "That makes it enormously difficult to operate a food system. Some of the campaigns in some of these states aren't really to inform consumers but rather aimed at scaring them. What this bill attempts to do is set a standard."

Supporters of GMO labeling argue that modified ingredients pose a threat to human health, and that as a result they should be clearly labeled in the marketplace so that consumers can make informed decisions. In addition to health concerns, they also point to the negative environmental consequences that could arise from widespread GMO use, since millions of acres of farmland and weeds are developing resistances to the pesticides used.

Opponents, however, point to their own studies, showing that GMO crops are safe and therefore do not need to be labeled differently than other products.

"It has to date made food safer and more abundant," Pompeo said. "It has been an enormous boon to all of humanity."

Pompeo’s bill has drawn the ire of the Center for Food Safety advocacy group, which noted his ties to the biotech company Monsanto and the Koch Industries corporation.

“[The] selection of Congressman Pompeo as their champion shows how extreme the proposal really is,” said Colin O’Neil, director of government affairs for Center for Food Safety. “Selecting Pompeo creates an unholy alliance between Monsanto and Koch Industries, two of the most reviled corporations in America.”

As RT reported last year, polling around the United States tends to find that a large majority of Americans favor GMO labeling, yet ballot initiatives to do just that keep failing in multiple states – an outcome advocates have blamed on huge amounts of corporate spending intended to move public opinion against the measures.

Meanwhile, another GMO flashpoint could be developing in Oregon, where Monsanto and five other agrochemical corporations are spending hundreds of thousands of dollars to oppose a measure that would ban the growth of GMO crops in Jackson County.

“This is a staggering amount of money for a local ordinance,” said Center for Food Safety senior attorney George Kimbrell. “For every vote they might get, Monsanto and its pals could afford to take each voter out for a fancy steak dinner.”

With the help of these companies, groups opposing the ban have raised nearly $800,000 to promote their view on the bill. Supporters of the ban, on the other hand, have a little more than $100,000 combined.

"It goes to prove just how much money is coming from outside of our county," Elise Higley, director of Our Family Farms Coalition, told The Oregonian. "The general reaction is that people are really angry that outsiders are pouring this much money into a county measure."

Comments (24)

 

Dominic Sio 12.07.2014 03:54


my question of the day is why all these "scholars" and "academias" ; trying so hard to prove a point here??? Dont they have better things to do unless they are all being paid huge amount of $$ by evil "you know who" corporations to do so...but trust me ...the more they tried to defend GMO the more people will realize their dirty evil tricks...If you look into their FB profile you will find that they dont talk about anything else but pro-GMO...smell fish already?

 

Fran G 25.05.2014 01:29

A 2009 study, "Failure to Yield", shows only a negligible increase in crop production for GMO crops. A 2013 article by Prof. Jack Heinemann entitled, "Sustainability and Innovation in Staple Crop in the U.S. Midwest", found yields of Western European non-GMO crops to be higher than those of GMO crops in the U.S. Midwest. Even critical assessments of this last study could find no significant increase in GMO crop yields. Yet we are told to ignore a number of studies and much anecdotal evidence on the ill effects on health from GMOs and the vast amounts of pesticides they require.

 

Phillip “ShadWolf” Pether 24.05.2014 07:38

joel cairo 24.05.2014 06:45

But...could you r e a l l y trust such a Non-GMO sticker???
We should all go back to only buy from local farmers who can be held accountable.

  



Actually yes, because they will be tested and verified if any GMO's were used during production, and if they fail to meet standards, they won't get those labels.

View all comments (24)
Add comment

Authorization required for adding comments

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

OK

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

X

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us

Follow us