Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.


​Dallas police insist filming cops 'a major safety issue' for civilians

Published time: April 11, 2014 23:19
Dallas police officers (Reuters/Jim Bourg)

Dallas police officers (Reuters/Jim Bourg)

Dallas police officers, including the union that represents them, are asking citizens organized to keep watch over cops with recording devices to stop filming law enforcement because it is causing unspecified “major safety issue[s].”

The calls for camera disarmament come after an incident two weeks ago that seems to have shaken the Dallas Police Department. According to CBS Dallas-Fort Worth, a woman with the local police accountability group Cop Block was “following” a police officer, according to CBS Dallas-Fort Worth, recording him making traffic stops with a “video camera.”

“He was conducting traffic stops,” DPD Sergeant Derek McCarter told CBS-DFW. “The officer called for cover to further investigate. The woman refused information and gave leading answers.”

Dallas Police Association President Ron Pinkston said this business of taping police officers is worrisome, as these citizens could get hurt.

“It’s creating a major officer safety issue,” he said without further specifying incidents in which law-abiding citizens filming officers have created hazardous conditions.

“We don’t know who it is pulling behind us. We don’t know they’re there to videotape, they might be part of… if that guy has (sic) just done a kidnapping they could be part of the kidnapping. You don’t know.”

In late 2012, the US Supreme Court upheld a citizen’s right to record police officers performing their official duties.

Thus, some Dallas officers have been notified by “an email,” according to CBS-DFW, that citizens are acting lawfully by filming police action.

The police union’s officials say they support dashboard cameras in squad cars and the Dallas Police Department’s plans to acquire body cameras for officers. But the union believes this is enough oversight for police action, CBS-DFW reported.

Police in Dallas and the surrounding area have been blamed for wasting little time in resorting to force against suspects.

Late last year, a Dallas police officer shot a 52-year-old mentally ill man. The incident was caught on video, which proved that the victim was not a threat to officers. The officer was subsequently fired and may face a first degree felony charge of aggravated assault.

In July 2012, a Dallas police officer, who was reportedly exhausted after chasing a suspect from a drug house, eventually shot and killed the unarmed man, prompting hundreds of local neighbors to form an impromptu protest in the area. The incident led the Dallas Police Department to change its chase policies, ordering officers to “stop a pursuit if the officer loses his weapon or communications, or if he loses sight of the suspect, or if the officer is too tired to continue the chase,” according to Texas Monthly.

Similarly, in September 2012, an unarmed man was shot at 41 times and killed by Dallas County police amid a traffic chase. A police dog was then sent into the cab of Michael Vincent Allen’s car. The German Shepherd bit Allen in the neck and jaw before dragging him to the pavement. A bystander had filmed the incident. His recording device was confiscated by police, who deleted the video. The shooting officer was eventually indicted for manslaughter by a grand jury.

Last December, amid these incidents of police brutality that mobilized the local population, a Texas criminal appeals court judge handed law enforcement increased authority, ruling that police in the state may now obtain a search warrant based on “a prediction of a future crime.”

Related, in March, the Illinois Supreme Court struck down the state’s broad eavesdropping law that prohibited the audio recording of any person, public or not, without consent.

Comments (35)


Sam Warnken 19.04.2014 22:15

I had a policeman pull me over for DUI, i blew a .08,.08, in the trial, i requested the dash video. It shows the policeman halfway through turning the camera away from filming me while he gave me the typical tests. I also learned that this illegal practice(hiding or destroying evidence) was common as most people appear sober and it can destroy the case at trial. Yeah stop filming the can really hurt them. In other news drivers want police to stop pulling them over.


Dare 14.04.2014 12:58

But they are saying basically, stay far back for "safety", because if you are back far enough you can not get the audio of the voices and conversation so it can cast "doubt" on any tape used in a lawsuit. It's a triple edge sword when it comes to story's and conduct. Until you bring in a video tape of action and voices. I ask this of all those apposed to video taping cops doing their jobs. Why? If they are doing their jobs correctly, why not? Bank tellers have camera's pointed at them their entire shifts watching them. Same thing, do your job correctly, and don't worry about it.


Doug Ellis 14.04.2014 11:27

Any officer or police union representative who wish to block the legal filming of police in public raise my suspicion that they are terrorist or hold terrorist ties, and as a result any officer or union rep who speaks out against filming police should be locked up with their families in Guantanamo Bay for several years until their innocence is proven. That is where we are going anyway with these types of anti-american regulation attempts on first amendment rights, right?

View all comments (35)
Add comment

Authorization required for adding comments

Register or



Show password


or Register

Request a new password


or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:


or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile



New password

Retype new password

Current password



Follow us

Follow us