US will not scale back drone warfare – Panetta

Published time: February 02, 2013 09:51
Edited time: February 02, 2013 14:16
Residents stand inside a damaged house after a missile attack in Damadola village of the Bajaur tribal region in Pakistan (Reuters / Ammad Waheed)

The US is engaged in a global war on terror, and drone strikes are an effective tool to eliminate Al-Qaeda militants planning terror attacks on America, US Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta told AFP, adding that drone operations should stay covert.

The US will not curtail its extrajudicial assassinations in Pakistan, Somalia and Yemen, Panetta said in a farewell interview: “We are in a war. We're in a war on terrorism and we've been in that war since 9/11.”

"The whole purpose of our operations were aimed at those who attacked this country and killed 3,000 innocent people in New York [on 9/11] as well as 200 people here at the Pentagon," he said.

Over a decade has passed since the beginning of the global war on terror; in that time, two countries were occupied by the US, and the mastermind of the 9/11 attacks, Osama Bin Ladenm was shot dead by American marines. Still, the war on terror must continue, Panetta said.

"I think it depends on the nature of the threat that we're confronting,” he explained.

Since terror threats continue to originate in Muslim countries – from Afghanistan in 2001 to Yemen in 2013 – it is unlikely the US will scale back its drone program in the foreseeable future.

Though US drones assassinate Al-Qaeda operatives in these countries without a court verdict or any form of due process, Panetta said that those governments are “pursuing the same goal” as the US. He said that the Yemeni government, for example, is strongly in favor of the US drone program.

Leon Panetta (AFP Photo / Paul J. Richards)
Leon Panetta (AFP Photo / Paul J. Richards)

But in October 2012, Pakistani Interior Minister Rehman Malik claimed that the majority of the people killed by American drones in Pakistan are civilians.

A US study in September 2012 revealed that only 2 percent of those killed in drone strike in Pakistan are actually top militants.

"I think we had a responsibility to use whatever technology we could to be able to go after those who not only conducted that attack but were planning to continue to attack this country," Panetta said.

The departing US Secretary of Defense also rejected the idea that overseas drone operations should be turned over from CIA control to the US military, which would require open reporting on every operation: “When you got those kind of operations where, because of the nature of the country you're in or the nature of the situation you're dealing with, it's got to be covert.”

An avid supporter of drone warfare, Panetta was largely responsible for the dramatic increase in drone attacks in Pakistan when he served as head of the CIA from 2009 to 2011. As the CIA director, he likely knew that the Hellfire missiles shot from drones have killed hundreds – if not thousands – of civilians, including children.

But the drone program has only expanded in recent years. At the start of 2013, the CIA escalated its use of drones in Pakistan, launching seven deadly strikes during the first 10 days of 2013 and killing at least 40 people, 11 of whom may have been civilians.

Because of the widespread claims that drone attacks are war crimes and an encroachment on national sovereignty, in January 2013 theUN launched a probe into civilian casualties from US and UK drone strikes and their legal implications.

Comments (54)

Anonymous user 28.02.2013 11:23

A civilian cannot be defined as such when they are indeed back support for the fighting front.

0

Undo

Arklight99 13.02.2013 20:13

The beauty of video game warfare is that no matter how many people are killed, who have no connection with the partisans, the dead can all be labeled 'suspected insurgents', and the murderers go to the EM Club for a beer when the shift ends. How do they live with that?

+1

Undo

green lantern (unregistered) 06.02.2013 15:01

If I were of HIGH mind- I would steer man into accepting what worthy to him by adding ignorance to his ideas of what is worthy.
A man becomes LOST in a desert for a time-
Only through miracle does he discovers while crawling on his hands and knees - a paved road.
On this road is a man standing behind with concession stand. This man makes him an offer-
You may have a bar of gold or a glass of water- but not both.

0

Undo

View all comments (54)
Add comment

By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our Posting rules

Log in to comment in full, or comment anonymously under character-limit restriction.

100 Text

– required fields

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us