Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.

 

Eric Holder defends prosecution of Aaron Swartz

Published time: March 06, 2013 19:08
Eric Holder (Chip Somodevilla / Getty Images / AFP)

Eric Holder (Chip Somodevilla / Getty Images / AFP)

United States Attorney General Eric Holder says that the Department of Justice never intended for computer hacker Aaron Swartz to serve a prison sentence longer than a couple of months.

Reporting to the Senate Judiciary Committee for an oversight hearing Wednesday morning, Mr. Holder said Swartz’s January suicide was “a tragedy” but that the Justice Department acted appropriately throughout the prosecution.

The Obama administration pursuit of Swartz, said Holder, demonstrated “a good use of prosecutorial discretion."

Swartz, 26, took his own life earlier this year months before he was expected to stand trial in a controversial federal case that carried a potential 35 year sentence if a conviction was returned.

Holder touched briefly on the hacktivist after Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) asked him on Wednesday to address allegations that the Justice Department harassed Swartz in order to have him plea to lesser offenses. The Obama administration has been accused of “trying to bully someone into pleading guilty to something,” Sen. Cornyn said, a claim to which the country’s top attorney refuted.

According to Holder, Swartz was presented with an option that would have left him escaping heavy sentencing in lieu of much more lenient punishment. Had Swartz accepted an offer from the Justice Department, Holder says he could have been sentenced to serve for no longer than a few months. The Justice Department never intended for Swartz to go to jail "for longer than a three, four, potentially five-month range," Holder said.

Asked by Cornyn if he thought the Massachusetts district attorney demonstrated prosecutorial overreach or misconduct in the Swartz case, Holder said, "I don't look at what necessarily was charged as much as what was offered in terms of how the case might have been resolved.”

Prosecutors say Swartz entered a utility closet at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 2009 and attempted to download millions of academic articles hosted on the website JSTOR. He was charged with gaining unauthorized access to a protected device under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act and

Following the activist’s death, Massachusetts US Attorney Carmen Ortiz was accused of acting overzealously in prosecuting Swartz for merely accessing scholarly articles. She responded by saying that her office’s conduct was appropriate in handling the case.

“As federal prosecutors, our mission includes protecting the use of computers and the Internet by enforcing the law as fairly and responsibly as possible. We strive to do our best to fulfill this mission every day,” she wrote. “The career prosecutors handling this matter took on the difficult task of enforcing a law they had taken an oath to uphold, and did so reasonably.”

One month after Swartz passed away, the Huffington Post ran a report in which they claimed congressional staffers were told by the Justice Department that the activist’s “Guerilla Open Access Manifesto” played a role in the prosecution. Swartz had co-authored the document and had posted it on his personal blog.

“I really need to know and Aaron’s family needs to know who made the decisions here. Who decided to prosecute him like this and why,” Swartz's partner, Taren Stinebrickner-Kauffman, told RT. “The testimony of these Justice Department officials to Congress points to the direction of this being a political prosecution because of his views on copyright and his views on political freedom.”

Swartz co-founded the website Reddit and also started the advocacy group Demand Progress, an organization that was instrumental in garnering opposition against the Stop Online Piracy Act, or SOPA, in 2012.



Comments (20)

 

Regula 27.12.2013 07:55

“As federal prosecutors, our mission includes protecting the use of computers and the Internet by enforcing the law as fairly and responsibly as possible."

Pressuring a young man into suicide is also a crime, but Holder covers it up snugly as does the US attorney. Did they ever even as much as ask themselves what effect their pressuring had on Aaron?

Besi des, the offer was 6 months in jail plus forced psychiatric treatment for depression, to essentially allow a mental illness justification - i.e. legitimize the false prosecution. Yes, more likely than not prosecution was politically motivated.

 

Dave B 04.12.2013 19:53

Anonymous user 09.07.2013 23:18

Holder is a blight on Justice.

  

It's hard to use Holder and justice in the same sentence but you did it!

Anonymous user 09.07.2013 23:18

Holder is a blight on Justice.

View all comments (20)
Add comment

Authorization required for adding comments

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

OK

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

X

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us