Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.

 

Anti-fracking activist asks court to lift ban keeping her from local hospital, grocery store

Published time: March 24, 2014 15:31

Reuters/Lucy Nicholson

Download video (32.5 MB)

Attorneys for a 62-year-old anti-fracking activist from Pennsylvania are in court on Monday attempting to overturn a ruling that keeps their client from stepping foot in nearly half of the county she lives in.

Since October, a preliminary injunction filed against Vera Scroggins of Brackney, PA has barred the retired nurse’s aide and grandmother from being on the property of any part of Susquehanna County leased by Cabot Oil and Gas — a Texas-based energy company that conducts shale gas extraction in the region through the controversial practice known as hydraulic fracturing, or fracking.

Scroggins is a vocal opponent of fracking and, according to Cabot, has trespassed on their property no fewer than 11 times to either lead unsanctioned tours of drilling sites or record footage about the operations that are then uploaded to her personal YouTube account. Currently, her page on the video-sharing site contains nearly 500 clips ranging from anti-fracking protests to county commissioners meetings where drillings were discussed.

Attorneys for Cabot likely aren’t exactly fans of that footage, though, and intend on May 1 to argue at trial that the preliminary injunction filed against Scroggins last October should be made permanent. In the meantime, Scroggins’ own legal team is in court this week arguing that the injunction should be altogether thrown out on account of being what they consider to be entirely too broad.

The current injunction indicates that “Ms. Scroggins is restrained, enjoined and prohibited from entering upon property owned and/or leased by Cabot Oil & Gas Corporation including but not limited to well sites, well pads and access roads.” According to Scroggins’ attorneys, though, Cabot has leased subsurface rights to more than 200,000 acres across the state, including around 40 percent of Susquehanna County.

In a motion to vacate that injunction filed by the defense, Scroggins’ attorneys said that the court’s decision not only “imposes a substantial hardship on her, is overbroad and violates her constitutional freedoms of speech and movement,” but wrote that “Cabot’s claim that it may exclude a person from the surface of any land above a Cabot mineral-rights leasehold would, if adopted, fundamentally alter the contours of Pennsylvania property law and usurp the rights of property owners throughout Susquehanna County to decide who may enter their land.”

“In the company’s view, the right to extract gas also includes the right to curtail the movements of an individual protesting the company’s activities so sharply that the individual is banned from her grocery store, local hospital, rehabilitation center, recycling center and friends’ homes,” they wrote. “In short, the right to extract gas is, according to the company, also the right to banish.”

Indeed, Scroggins says that her personal life has effectively put turned upside down by the injunction. According to the motion to vacate, she legally is not allowed inside of the hospital that is nearest to her home or the neighborhood hardware store. Additionally, her lawyers say she spent hours researching what properties are in fact leased to Cabot “and she is anxious that she will accidentally go where she is forbidden.”

"They might as well have put an ankle bracelet on me with a GPS on it and be able to track me wherever I go," Scroggins told The Guardian in January. "I feel like I am some kind of a prisoner, that my rights have been curtailed, have been restricted."

"We need a map. We need to know where I can and can not go," she told the paper. "Can I stop here, or can I not stop here? Is it OK to be here if I go to a business or if I go to a home? I have had to ask and check out every person I go to: 'are you leased to Cabot'?"

When The Guardian reached Cabot for comment in January, spokesperson George Stark said “Cabot supports an individual's right to free speech and regrets having to seek relief from the court in order to prevent Ms. Scroggins from repeatedly trespassing on company property, where she could potentially jeopardize the safety of herself and others."

"Cabot's primary concern is with operational sites where safety issues are concerned," he added to Reuters this week.

Monday’s hearings are at the Susquehanna County Court of Common Pleas in Montrose, Pennsylvania and will be head by Judge Kenneth Seamans. Scroggins is being represented by attorneys from both the American Civil Liberties Union and Public Citizen.

Comments (9)

 

Kevin G. O'Neill 26.03.2014 19:05

We need to create some sort of "Scroggins Clause", a legal framework by which Vera and any of us may lawfully transit upon these permitted resource exploitation sites 24/7, with whatever sensing and/or recording gear we wish, to observe and share whatever is going on, subject to whatever personal protection gear may be necessary from time to time.

~ Privacy ends where exploitation begins ~

 

dancebackthesea 25.03.2014 13:03

The corporate state brands we the people who stand up to protest their legacy of greed, and the destruction they havoc on our world, as "terrorists&quo t;.

These are the same corporations that use our infrastructure, our lands, rivers, and people to poison, yet pay nearly no taxes and are even given subsidies to make sure they continue to get richer without having to take responsibility for their actions. All is sacrificed on the holy alter of profit, whatever the cost to the rest of us. They own the government, and through things like the Trans Pacific Partnership and other trade deals, they want to own the world.

 

James Cameron 25.03.2014 00:24

I was wondering if fracking caused the current nuclear emergency in New Mexico. There is a youtube video which reveals the Carrizozo volcano venting in 2012, each time shortly after dark. Due to the volcanic activity, the narrator expects an earthquake.
On 17 March 2014, there was a huge explosion and plume in New Mexico. that originated at the Carrizozo volcano, shortly after dark.
That the volcano venting was shortly after dark each time, for me raises the question: Did they know fracking would cause the volcano to vent?
The leaking underground nuclear waste storage plant is not far from the volcano.

View all comments (9)
Add comment

Authorization required for adding comments

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

OK

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

X

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us

Follow us