Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.

 

Manning trial: Judge rules WikiLeaks tweets relevant to ‘aiding the enemy’ charges

Published time: June 28, 2013 17:16
U.S. Army Private First Class Bradley Manning (C) is escorted from the courtroom after a day of his court martial trial at Fort Meade, Maryland June 25, 2013. (Reuters / Yuri Gripas)

U.S. Army Private First Class Bradley Manning (C) is escorted from the courtroom after a day of his court martial trial at Fort Meade, Maryland June 25, 2013. (Reuters / Yuri Gripas)

A military judge overseeing Bradley Manning's court-martial has found WikiLeaks tweets, claiming possession of encrypted video, are relevant evidence to the “aiding the enemy” charges the whistleblower is facing.

On the 12th day of trial, which resumed at Fort Meade, Maryland, June 26, military judge Col. Denise Lind weighed the admissibility of three pieces of evidence suggesting that an Army private Bradley Manning, 25, accused with leaking more than 700,000 files to WikiLeaks, took his cues from the whistle-blowing organization in disclosing classified information.

Read RT’s live updates on the court-martial of Pfc. Bradley Manning.

Judge Lind has ruled that two WikiLeaks tweets from 2010 – one claiming to have an encrypted video of US strikes on civilians and the other seeking military Internet addresses – are admissible for Identification.

Despite this, there is still no evidence that Private First Class Bradley Manning, 25, saw either of these tweets, the judge ruled that they can be admitted as circumstantial evidence, due to their timing and public availability and the fact that Manning was known to have searched Intelink (the military’s Google) for ‘WikiLeaks.’

As for another piece of evidence – WikiLeaks’ "Most Wanted" list of items it was seeking from the public, apparently posted in November 2009 on its website -  the judge ruled that it is not “properly authenticated”, while it still would be relevant to show Manning’s knowledge of WikiLeaks and its intentions.

Manning’s defense team has been arguing that Twitter postings offered by prosecutors did not meet the court's standards.

"Anyone can create a Web page...that looks like WikiLeaks or that looks like Twitter," attorney Captain Joshua Tooman said when the government was first considering its case. 

Back then the lawyer insisted a government investigator had accessed the tweets through Google cache, rather than directly through Twitter or WikiLeaks. He claimed, the evidence failed to meet the test of authenticity since there was no way of knowing what the website looked like when the tweet or page was published.

Bradley Manning, charged with 22 counts, faces trial more than three years after his arrest for transmitting 700,000 classified documents to WikiLeaks, what is said to be the biggest US data leak in the nation’s history. Manning pleaded guilty to charges of leaking information to the anti-secrecy website, which alone could confine him to prison for 20 years, but the US is pursuing further charges of aiding the enemy, which carries a maximum sentence of death.

Comments (42)

Anonymous user 09.07.2013 16:39

Where's your humanity, this guy did the right thing! Thank you Manning!

 

sam smith 02.07.2013 20:14

US should have been executing all the US citizen spies all along to send a message like the Rosenburgs! and not a country club prison like the traitor Pollard.

Anonymous user 02.07.2013 19:26

Holy Coyote, please be sure these JAGs' strategy comes back around to bite them in the butt. Amen.

View all comments (42)
Add comment

Authorization required for adding comments

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

OK

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

X

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us

Follow us