Monsanto spends millions to fight labeling of genetically modified food

Published time: August 16, 2012 17:07
Edited time: August 16, 2012 21:07
An anti-GMO activist holds a bag containing "MON 810", a variety of genetically modified maize (corn) developed by Monsanto, coated with an insectiside named Poncho (AFP Photo/Eric Cabanis)

Activists in California are fighting to pass Proposition 37, a law that would legally require genetically modified foods to be labeled as such. Biotech giant Monsanto doesn’t like that idea, though, and has donated over $4.2 million to oppose it.

If the majority of voters in California can come together to support Proposition 37 on Election Day, companies such as Monsanto will be forced to advertise products created through genetic engineering and modification as being exactly that. And although the initiative is being touted by activists who demand a right to know what is being sold in supermarkets and grocery stores across the state, Monsanto and other GMO corporations are condemning the legislation.

No on 37, a “coalition against the deceptive food labeling scheme, sponsored by farmers and food producers,” has been put together to push back the proposition. According to campaign records publically available on the California State Department’s website, Monsanto has handed over $4,208,000 so far to support the movement aimed against Prop 37.

Dow Agrosciences, a multi-billion-dollar chemical company with strong GMO ties, has also contributed almost $1.2 million; Dupont has offered $1,273,600.

Taking into account the contributors from by Dupont, Dow and Monsanto made only this week, those three entities alone have donated $6.8 million in just a few days towards fighting the mandated labeling. The parent companies of Nestle, Pepsi, Hershey and Kellogg have also made handed over substantial amounts of money, as have Coca Cola, Sara Lee, Rich Products , Dole and Del Monte — and some have even made repeated donations.

"Everyone is impacted because everyone buys groceries, and one of the impacts is going to be higher grocery bills," No on 37 spokesperson Kathy Fairbanks tells the Associated Press. "Prop. 37 leaves consumers with the incorrect impression that there is something wrong with GE crops, when that is not true."

In a classic case of David against Goliath, though, the supporters of Prop 37 say that they will persevere in the end, even if they are going against millions of dollars in unmatched contributions.

“The giant pesticide and food companies are afraid of the mothers and grandmothers who want the right to know what’s in our food,” Stacy Malkan, media director of California Right to Know, tells Raw Story. “These companies will try to buy the election, but it won’t work. California moms and dads will prevail over Monsanto and Dupont.“

So far No on 37 has raised almost $25 million, more than 10 times what supporters of the proposition have produced, the AP reports. The bill will be up for vote on Election Day this November.

Comments (23)

Marc Authier (unregistered) 30.11.2012 22:56

Really fantastic results. I am happy that so many Californians are that stupid and imbeciles. Time to die Californians. Hope a lot of you enjoy your organ failure and your cancer. Drink Coca Cola and swallow your Big Mac. Dont forget to vote again for Terminator. What a bunch of total mentally retarded   cretins ! They deserve what we call in french un gros char de marde. Because this is what Californians are, De la gross marde, Manure is healthier than GMOs and pigs are more intelligent than Californians voters.

0

Undo

jacobsladder 29.09.2012 06:10

people have a right to know the truth, don't we supposely live in a open society. label the damn food, i want to know what im eating. if people cant afford to eat natural or oganic then the can stick to GMO's and die sooner. Whats wrong with having options America!

0

Undo

ahwhat (unregistered) 27.09.2012 13:53

Hey why fight the labeling if their tests came out ok? Any kind of fight against making a truthful statement SHOULD tell us all that the subject is not benign....

0

Undo

View all comments (23)
Add comment

By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our Posting rules

Log in to comment in full, or comment anonymously under character-limit restriction.

100 Text

– required fields

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us