Law enforcement confirms convicted fraudster behind anti-Muslim movie

Published time: September 13, 2012 14:35
Edited time: October 02, 2012 11:36
Malaysian Muslims hold placards and shout anti-American slogans during a protest against the low-budget US film the 'Innocence of Muslims' and the cartoon of Prophet Mohammad in a French weekly in Kuala Lumpur on September 21, 2012. (AFP Photo/Str)

Law enforcement has confirmed that the anti-Muslim movie blamed for attacks at US diplomatic buildings around the world was made by Los Angeles filmmaker Nakoula Basseley Nakoula.

The Associated Press reported early Thursday that Nakoula, 55, is responsible for the "Innocence of Muslims,” the film that was said to ridicule the prophet Muhammad and, in turn, prompt violent assaults on US land overseas, including missions in Egypt, Libya, Tunisia and the US Embassy in Yemen.

Nakoula gave an interview to the AP on Wednesday and insisted that he managed logistics for the firm that produced the film, but denied any role as a director, a position that had been linked to a man using the name Sam Bacile. The AP claims to have traced the cell phone number provided to them as Bacile’s back to the same Los Angeles area home where they had earlier met with Nakoula.

Hours later on Thursday, a law enforcement official speaking on condition of anonymity confirmed to the AP that Nakoula was in fact behind the production of the film to a degree must larger than he claimed.

During their investigation, the AP identified Nakoula as an ex-con who had been convicted of bank fraud. He described himself as a Coptic Christian and had connections with Morris Sadek, a conservative practicing member of the religion who had promoted "Innocence of Muslims,” in the days before the film is believed to have sparked outrage overseas.

On their part, LA Weekly claims to have successfully tied Nakoula to Media for Christ, a company that described itself as “established to become the light that shows Jesus Christ to all human beings” that is also listed on the permit obtained to film the flick.

Since the attacks on US diplomatic establishments this week, the cast involved in the film have condemned the movie, issuing a joint-statement saying they feel that they were taken advantage of by the producer.

"We are 100 percent not behind this film and were grossly misled about its intent and purpose," the statement read.

A July 2011 call for work placed in Backstage magazine described the movie as a "historical Arabian Desert adventure film,” that was looking to cast for the roles of George, “a strong leader, romantic, tyrant, a killer with no remorse,” and Assad, a “bearded tribe leader” with an “Israeli accent.”

The actors who participated in the film said that they were not aware that the film mocked Muhammad and that extra lines were added and dubbed into Egyptian Arabic in post-production.

Cindy Lee Garcia, an actress in the film, tells AP, “there was never any mention of Muhammad, Muslims or anything like that in the film. I was just playing the role of a mother.”

“We were supposed to be playing a film of how life was 2,000 years ago,” she claims.

Garcia says that when she confronted the director for an explanation over the final product, he told her to clear her name and explained that he was motivated because, “I’m tired of the radical Muslims running around killing everyone.”

Comments (64)

Iftikar (unregistered) 21.09.2012 17:27

It may be true that actors in this film were deceived by producer but everybody knows that dubbing takes place with same characters.So there is a big Question mark on Film Actors Innocense.As for as defaming of Prophet Mohammad  (PBUH) is concerned it is written in Holy Quran that with the pasage of Time Prophet Mohammad (PBUH) praises will increase. (94-4)So who so ever tries to defame Prophat Mohammad (PBUH) is working as a counter-productive for his Praise and Status.

0

Undo

Esswasim (unregistered) 17.09.2012 17:21

Don't you get it , they even lied to the actors, they are basically corrupt people, hence the corrupt last product from them... Imagine a movie getting US ambassadors and marines killed did it bring any good to them by having sme families mourn over the dead bodies of their loved ones ? No they just represent hate and hate is what they will get. I am a Muslim and I dont kill humans becoz I love them but when some humans spread hate I am in support for their death and even the death of their supporters. 

0

Undo

tony (unregistered) 16.09.2012 15:43

Let's be clear: The movie (which is really badly made and rather idiotic, frankly) did not cause attacks on Americans, any more than mini-skirts cause rape.In this case, religious zealots caused attacks on Americans (just like rape is only caused by rapists).In a truly democratic society, freedom of expression is paramount, so even the creation of a badly made movie, found morally offensive by some, is a protected right.Do Muslims have the right to be offended? Sure! And they can voice that expression. What they don't have is the right to murder innocent people unrelated to the film (or, for that matter, even people related to the film), just because they're offended.

0

Undo

View all comments (64)
Add comment

By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our Posting rules

Log in to comment in full, or comment anonymously under character-limit restriction.

100 Text

– required fields

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us