Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.

 

New Mexico judge rules assisted suicide a 'fundamental right'

Published time: January 14, 2014 19:39
Reuters / Eric Gaillard

Reuters / Eric Gaillard

New Mexico is set to become the fifth US state where doctors are allowed to aid the death of terminally ill patients after a landmark court ruling.

“This court cannot envision a right more fundamental, more private or more integral to the liberty, safety and happiness of a New Mexican than the right of a competent, terminally ill patient to choose aid in dying,” Judge Nan G. Nash of the Second District Court in Albuquerque wrote in her ruling.

"If decisions made in the shadow of one's imminent death regarding how they and their loved ones will face that death are not fundamental and at the core of these constitutional guarantees, than what decisions are?"

The decision came after a two-day hearing of a case brought by two doctors on behalf of Aja Riggs, a 49-year-old uterine cancer patient, who is currently in remission, but wants a lethal injection if her condition worsens.

“I don’t want to suffer needlessly at the end,” Riggs told the court during one of the sessions.

As of now, assisting a suicide within state borders is a fourth-degree felony, and could lead to 18 months in jail and a fine of up to $5,000, according to a law passed in 1963.

Aja Riggs, the cancer sufferer at the heart of the case (Screenshot from youtube.com @CompassionChoicesNM)

The plaintiffs, supported by nationwide advocacy groups, argued that the law did not apply to medical conditions.

The judge rejected the argument, but agreed that the ability to end one’s life as desired was a “fundamental right.”

It is not clear if the ruling will apply statewide, or just to the district where it was announced, and New Mexico’s state attorney’s office is considering appealing the judge’s decision.

If New Mexico does allow doctor-assisted suicide, it will follow the trail pioneered by Oregon in 1997, and since followed by Washington, Vermont and Montana.

Despite fears that the assisted suicide law would be used ubiquitously and indiscriminately, facts do not appear to bear this out.

Statistics from 2012, the latest available from Oregon, show that only 77 people chose physician assisted death, or 0.2 percent of the total. All but two of them had been in a hospice when they had made the decision.

Comments (6)

 

Bob Kranz 15.01.2014 04:04

When humans decide to end the life of a suffering loved pet, no one objects. It's a personal decision for the caregiver of their pet.
We are not talking about a care giving human deciding to end suffering for a parent or sibling or child, but about oneself.
With a small amount of consultation for the purpose of gaining an expert second opinion, no one should be denied this option for closure.

 

MonsantoGoingDown 15.01.2014 03:18

You can keep your doctor... if his name is Kevorkian.

 

Godzilla_Govt 15.01.2014 02:21

It's not the place of the State to kill its citizens. Nor is it the place of the State to keep people alive.

View all comments (6)
Add comment

Authorization required for adding comments

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

OK

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

X

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us