Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.


Breaking news

Lavrov: US should face responsibility for powers it installed in Kiev

DNA samples taken at police checkpoint ‘gross abuse of power,’ say PA drivers

Published time: December 18, 2013 03:59
AFP Photo / Ross Mantle

AFP Photo / Ross Mantle

A Pennsylvania community is asking questions after a government contractor, with help from the local police, pulled drivers off the road and into a parking lot to ask about their driving and – most notably – pressure them into providing a DNA sample.

Residents in Reading, Pennsylvania said they were forced off the road by employees of the Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, a contractor hired by the National Highway traffic Safety Administration and the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy. But the Reading city police were also at the scene with the lights in their patrol cars flashing, which drivers said gave the experiment a level of legitimacy it should not have had.

I feel this incident is a gross abuse of power on many levels,” Ricardo Nieves, a Reading resident who was stopped in the search, told the City Council, as quoted by the Reading Eagle.

Police officials have maintained that the search was only meant to poll drivers on their habits behind the wheel and that the DNA collection was intended to detect prescription drug use. That explanation has failed to satisfy many, with Mr. Nieves complaining that he had to refuse several times before he was released.

A federal survey with local police help violates my rights,” he said, adding that he was never told what the swab test was meant for but “clearly it was for DNA.”

Chief William M. Heim told the Reading Eagle that police frequently use checkpoints to inspect for seatbelt use, drunk driving, safety regulations, and a variety of other reasons. He denied Nieves’ claim that this incident infringed on anyone’s rights.

People are not pressured by police presence to do something they don’t want to,” he said. “In the grand scheme of things, I think it’s a pretty innocuous and minor issue.”

Mary Catherine Roper, a senior staff attorney for the Pennsylvania American Civil Liberties Union, disagreed. The checkpoint in question was designed as part of a three-year nationwide survey that cost taxpayers $7.9 million. But, at a time when the Obama administration is facing heavy scrutiny for the National Security Agency surveillance programs, these surveys are have become especially controversial.

A car driver or passenger cannot be required or pressured into providing a DNA sample and in fact, can’t be stopped at all except on suspicion of a crime or for a properly conducted sobriety checkpoint,” Roper said.

Police in Ohio, Alabama, and Texas have been criticized for using similar tactics to help researchers. Unlike in some of those states, though, Pennsylvania lawmakers criticized the police action. Councilman Dennis Sterner wondered why investigators seem to be unable to arrest drug dealers without a cumbersome investigation but are allow to stop drivers whenever they choose.

Comments (20)


Faye Brown 20.12.2013 18:25

This rising mandatory drawing of blood, could be a search for enemies in cleaver disguises, which could unmistakably be identified by DNA …. (there are secrets in this world not told which bares serious consequences to national security) .. some say most of mainstream could not handle or are not capable of comprehending the truth … I ..would have to agree … one other thought comes to mind .. is that carriers of viruses could have been sent in to spread a specific kind of health danger .. which could be identified in the blood …


D.J. Partin 19.12.2013 19:50

This is not ok.... this is not a 'minor issue' as the Sheriff apparently believes!... This is a violation of peoples basic rights and by having squad cars present it gives the impression that this is just like a DUI checkpoint and to some, who don't know their rights, it may give the impression its mandatory

B ottom line here is this.... where will it stop? whats the next line they toe, or even cross?

If I were a resident of Reading I would launch a campaign to get that Sheriff out of office.... if this is no big deal to him then where does HE draw the line as the person who enforces the law??

Take a Stand People!


Bradley Mead 19.12.2013 19:09

Just say no. You have the right to say no. Then you Tell them your leaving, if they protest then your being held against your will. Instant law suit.

View all comments (20)
Add comment

Authorization required for adding comments

Register or



Show password


or Register

Request a new password


or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:


or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile



New password

Retype new password

Current password



Follow us