Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.


US prison population jumps 27% in a decade over harsh drug sentencing

Published time: December 09, 2013 22:39
Edited time: December 11, 2013 10:28
AFP Photo /  Bill Pugliano

AFP Photo / Bill Pugliano

The number of Americans incarcerated in federal prisons throughout the country has increased by nearly 30 percent over the past ten years, according to a new report by an investigative arm of Congress.

The Government Accountability Office (GAO) report released Monday attributed the 27 percent surge in prison population to mandatory sentencing minimums. The practice, in which a judge's discretion is almost completely removed from the sentencing process, mandates that nonviolent drug offenders are given pre-determined sentences. Critics have asserted that those prison terms are needlessly harsh and can put someone who presents no physical threat to society behind bars for decades.

The Department of Justice's (OJ) Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) is responsible for the custody and care of over 219,000 federal inmates – a population that has grown by 27 percent in the past decade,” the GAO report states. “BOP is composed of 119 institutions, 6 regional offices, 2 staff training centers, 22 residential reentry management offices (previously called community corrections offices), and a central office in Washington DC.

With a fiscal year 2013 operating budget of about $6.5 billion – the second-largest budget within DOJ – BOP projects that its costs will increase as the federal prison population grows through 2018...A variety of factors contribute to the size of BOP's population. These include national crime levels, law enforcement policies, and federal sentencing laws, all of which are beyond BOP's control,” the report continued.

Punishment for the same crime has become much more severe over the past quarter-century, according to a study released earlier this year by the Urban Institute. Drug offenders arrested in 1974 were facing an average of 38.5 months, yet if someone was charged with a similar crime in 2011 they would have faced an average of 74 months.

Prison populations only swelled during that time. Just 50 percent of convicted drug offenders were sentenced to prison in 1986, but that percentage jumped 40 points to a 90 percent likelihood in 2011.

Such numbers are relevant not only to drug users and their families, but also American taxpayers who foot the bill for the swelling incarceration rate. The Justice Department's budget for the federal prison system increased from $5 billion in 2008 to $6.9 billion today. Of that total, $2.5 billion is meant for inmate programs such as drug treatment, “psychology services,” and $435 million for food services.

Signaling the Obama administration's awareness of the growing problem, US Attorney General Eric Holder announced in August of this year that the Justice Department would no longer pursue prison time for nonviolent drug offenders. He also called on federal prosecutors to charge suspects in ways that do not automatically trigger mandatory minimum sentencing.

Holder said that the War on Drugs of past decades now means “too many Americans go to too many prisons for far too long, and for no truly good law enforcement reason.”

Comments (32)


Bitter Reality 09.03.2014 18:15

Mark Smith 11.12.2013 09:33

There much missing from this article concerning the issue. For example; I was once told by someone from a local prosecutor's office


Wh at utter BS, prosecutor/DA's are corrupt traitors working for their employers the "Treason for Profit" parasites running the private prisons.


Bitter Reality 09.03.2014 18:12

Treason for profit.

The corrupt judges (All) aided by the corrupt DA's (All) then commit treason by accepting bribes to imprison innocent people.

The psychopathic parasites waging war on fellow citizens over a plant need their day in court and their well deserved execution.


Mark Smith 11.12.2013 09:33

There much missing from this article concerning the issue. For example; I was once told by someone from a local prosecutor's office that a lot of the "non-violent&qu ot; drug charges are pursued because the underlying, often far more serious, crimes would require testimony by witnesses. In other words, often a more serious crime is actually committed, but since drugs were found it was the "non-violent&qu ot; drug crime for which charges were pressed so that the victim of the violent crime would be spared having to testify. The problems with proving this are difficult; innocent until proven guilty, lack of documentation, etc.

View all comments (32)
Add comment

Authorization required for adding comments

Register or



Show password


or Register

Request a new password


or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:


or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile



New password

Retype new password

Current password



Follow us