Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.

 

Ron Paul welcomes US-Saudi rift

Published time: October 28, 2013 15:31
Former US Representative Ron Paul (R-TX) (AFP Photo/Brendan Smialowski)

Former US Representative Ron Paul (R-TX) (AFP Photo/Brendan Smialowski)

Diplomatic relations between the United States and Saudi Arabia have recently gone sour, but longtime lawmaker Ron Paul says the fall-out is something worth celebrating.

The recently-retired Republican congressman from Texas writes in an op-ed this week that murmurings of a strain between the US and Saudis should be welcomed by Americans and may allow both nations to “return to peace and commerce rather than sink under entangling alliances.”

Earlier this month it was reported that the Saudis refuted a chair in the United Nations Security Council due to concerns regarding America’s handling of recent events in the Middle East, namely Syria and Iran. The Wall Street Journal reported that the Saudi intelligence chief told European diplomats that his country would be scaling back cooperation with the US due in part to Washington’s refusal to attack Syrian Pres. Bashar al-Assad over his reported use of chemical weapons. Additionally, news of an emerging alliance between the US and Iran — a long-time opponent of Saudi Arabia — wasn’t welcomed in the Kingdom either.

And although the Saudis said they wouldn’t take a seat within the Security Council, Prince Bandar Bin Sultan al-Saud told the Wall Street Journal, "This was a message for the US, not the UN.”

"Obviously he wants us to do more," a senior US official told the paper, suggesting Saudi Arabian leadership had hoped the US would reply on military action, not diplomacy, with regards to Iran and Syria.

According to Paul, the brand new rift could do wonders for all those involved.

Why does Saudi Arabia insist that the United States fight its battles?” he asks in an editorial published on Sunday on the website for the Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity, a think-tank formed earlier this year by the former congressman in an effort to promote non-interventionism. “The Saudis are strongly opposed to the governments in Syria and Iran so they expect the US to attack. It is their neighborhood, why don’t they fight their own wars? Israel shares the same position in the region as Saudi Arabia: it has been fighting to overthrow Assad in Syria for years, and Israeli leadership constantly pushes the US toward war on Iran. They are both working on the same side of these issues but why do they keep trying to draw us in?” he asks.

Paul says “unwritten agreements” exists compelling the US to ensure the American military defends both Saudi Arabia and Israel. “But when the US becomes so involved, we are the real losers -- especially the American taxpayers, who are forced to finance this global military empire,” he adds.

It is an unhealthy relationship that should come to an end,” Paul writes of America’s alliances overseas. “If Saudi Arabia and Israel are so determined to extend their influence in the region and share such similar goals, why don’t they work together to stabilize the region without calling on the US for back-up? It might be healthy for them to cooperate and leave us out of it.”

US Secretary of State John Kerry visited with Saudi leaders last week to attempt and keep the rift from widening further. “We know that the Saudis were obviously disappointed that the [Syrian] strike did not take place and had questions about some of the other things that may be happening in the region,” Mr. Kerry said, according to Foreign Times. Leaders from both nations engaged in a “very frank” talk, Kerry said, and agreed that all parties oppose an Iranian nuclear weapon program. As the relationship between Tehran and Washington is showing signs of improvement. Saudi might not make it a priority to mend things with the US anytime soon — and much to Paul’s delight.


Comments (14)

 

Tyrant 30.10.2013 02:16

un-chained and angry 28.10.2013 23:49

Counting this post- RT says 24 / -my count 14.

Maybe this spam button is a double-edged sword.

My first comment (and first on this story) basically said 'We
could of had a RON PAUL.

  


You can't fix this system from within -it's too far gone. Ron Paul did the right thing by leaving that circus and going directly to the people with his institute. Wall Street has it's fingers in all four branches (counting press) of government, and you can't win by playing their game by their rules, and Dr. Paul understood this.

That is why he left.

 

Mike Martin 29.10.2013 20:07

Such a sad story for Americas future. Mr.Paul was doomed by the lame stream media paid for and ran by the odd bed fellows the Zionist and the Saudis who hate Mr.Paul because he wont bow to any foreign gov.He is but a select few who have honor,wit,and courage to say what he feels and truly loves this nation I call home.I was hoping he would have ditched the GOP and went independent but like so many he needed the publicity that he wouldnt have achieved under a libertarian or independent ticket.I wish Ross Perot would have funded him.

 

SourceKnown! 28.10.2013 22:58

Well met, Elder Paul!

Human ity needs some help, are you busy?

View all comments (14)
Add comment

Authorization required for adding comments

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

OK

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

X

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us

Follow us