San Francisco moves to ban public nudity

Published time: November 19, 2012 16:50
Edited time: November 19, 2012 20:50
Supporters of human rights stage a naked torch run in San Francisco on April 9, 2008. (Max Whittaker/Getty Images/AFP)

If you're going to San Francisco, be sure to wear, well, something. The Northern California city’s long-standing acceptance of public nudity is under attack, and baring it all might be a crime pending a vote scheduled for this week.

Lawmakers in San Francisco are expected to vote Tuesday on a measure that, if passed, will pose a problem for the city’s substantial nudist population. Should officials opt to approve a controversial proposal introduced by Supervisor Scott Wiener, clothing will soon be all but mandatory in the City by the Bay.

Residents of San Francisco have had a long-standing acceptance of public nudity, but Wiener wonders if it has gone too far. He cites an explosion in recent years of nakedness in the city’s famously gay Castro District — the very neighborhood he represents — as reason enough to warrant legislation.

"I don't think having some guys taking their clothes off and hanging out seven days a week at Castro and Market Street is really what San Francisco is about. I think it's a caricature of what San Francisco is about," Wiener said. Now if he has his way that could all change.

Should Wiener’s proposal be approved during this week’s vote, it’ll be for once and for all illegal for any person over the age of 5 to "expose his or her genitals, perineum or anal region on any public street, sidewalk, street median, parklet or plaza" or while using public transit.

Attendees at events awarded city permits, such as those at the annual sadomasochism-friendly Folsom Street Fair, would escape prosecution for public nudity. Those that regularly disrobe in the Castro district and display eye-catching genital jewelry and body modifications not exactly modicum in good taste will be left looking at a $100 fine for their first offense, and perhaps jail time if two more tickets are issued by the police.

Business owners in the Castro are aware of the city’s rich tradition of turning the other cheek when it comes to public nudity. Rob Cox, board secretary of the Castro/Eureka Valley Neighborhood Association, echoes Wiener’s call in saying things have just gone too far lately. Speaking to the Los Angeles Times, Cox claims that "Ninety percent of the business owners were furious” when a group of so-called “Naked Guys” starting staking out city territory to turn into their own personal nudist playground.

"Jane Warner Plaza is the only usable public plaza in the Castro," Cox said during a recent Board of Supervisors meeting. "It is our town square. And it has become dominated just about every afternoon by one group…. The Castro is not about a group of men exposing themselves every day."

McCray Winpsett is a 37-year-old exhibitionist and understands complaints like that one from Cox. "A few lewd exhibitionists are really ruining it for the rest of us," Winpsett tells the Associated Press, while still suggesting that the proposed law might be overreaching on behalf of Wiener. To the AP, Winpsett says Wiener’s proposal has the possibility of ruining the long-standing custom "that keeps San Francisco weird."

Should Wiener’s have his way this week, San Francisco is likely to stay pretty weird. Public nudity will just be a matter reserved for permitted events.

"I suspect there are a lot of places that maybe don't currently have a local law (and) that if people started getting naked every day would quickly see a local law," Wienertells the AP.

Comments (11)

Anonymous user 07.03.2013 11:35

Its about time they banned this

0

Undo

landofthefree 23.11.2012 01:52

I'm sorry to be the one to have to say it, but the majority (if not all) of the exhibitionists are no doubt gay. Come on guys! It's one thing to 'come out', but don't 'come out' of your clothes in public.  Maybe you're just getting your rocks off checking out your mates' genitals and rear-ends in public??

0

Undo

makron (unregistered) 20.11.2012 17:42

zzz (unregistered) wrote in #7
Being nude is not a crime. A human body is not vulgar and shouldn't be covered up for the sake of twisted ideas. The main purpose of clothing is to protect our bodies. The second purpose would simply be for aesthetics. Sure, a nude fat guy might be uncomfortable to look at but what of ugly faces. Would having an ugly face be a crime? Would the government require a person to cover their face for being too ugly?

if the face is truely and horrifically ugly, then i have no objections. human ugliness standard for ugly person is pretty low, so when a government requires a person to cover up their faces, it usually means the face is indeed ugly to the point that is beyond the boundary of being just ugly.

0

Undo

View all comments (11)
Add comment

By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our Posting rules

Log in to comment in full, or comment anonymously under character-limit restriction.

100 Text

– required fields

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us