Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.

 

Supreme Court refuses to make early ruling in NSA case

Published time: April 07, 2014 15:16
US Supreme Court.(AFP Photo / Karen Bleier)

US Supreme Court.(AFP Photo / Karen Bleier)

The United States Supreme Court said Monday that it won’t be weighing-in at this time on a case that challenges the constitutionally of the National Security Agency’s bulk metadata collection program.

Instead, the country’s high court said that plaintiff Larry Klayman will have to wait to have his case heard there pending the results of a lower court’s eventual ruling.

Klayman — a conservative lawyer and former Justice Department attorney — sued the NSA over the once-secret surveillance program last June shortly after leaked documents disclosed by intelligence contractor Edward Snowden showed that the US government has been routinely compelling telecommunication companies for the phone records of millions of Americans on a regular basis.

Judge Richard Leon of the US District Court for the District of Columbia said in December that the NSA program “implicated the Fourth Amendment” and was “almost Orwellian” in nature. He issued a stay with his ruling, however, due to what he called “the significant national security interests at stake in this case and the novelty of the constitutional issues.”

Leon said then that he expected the appellate process to last at least six months, prompting Klayman to file a petition with the Supreme Court that insisted his case be heard there ahead of any activity on the appellate level — a request that is rarely granted by SCOTUS.

Nevertheless, Klayman wrote in his petition for a writ of certiorari last year that “This case is of such imperative public importance that it justifies deviation from normal appellate practice and requires immediate consideration and determination in the Supreme Court.”

On Monday, the high court said simply that Klayman’s request had been denied, putting the fate of the matter back for now in the hands of the federal appellate courts.

According to Ars Technica journalist Dave Kravets, legal scholars had predicted that Klayman's petition would be rejected by the Supreme Court.

Still, there was a glimmer of a chance that the justices would have accepted Klayman's case and decided the outcome of what is likely the biggest constitutional crisis the Supreme Court has been presented with in the digital age,” he wrote.

The high court's inaction Monday means the future of the phone surveillance program will most likely play itself out in the political theater before the judicial arena. Section 215 of the Patriot Act, the stated provision allowing the bulk collection, expires June 1, 2015,” Kravets added.

Meanwhile, US President Barack Obama said last month that Congress should draft legislation that would mandate that the NSA no longer hold onto those call records and would instead have to turn to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court to approve requests to telecommunication companies on an individual basis.

A separate case filed against the NSA program by the American Civil Liberties Union last June in a different district court was initially shot-down by a federal judge. The ACLU has since appealed.

Mr. Klayman did not immediately respond to RT’s request for comment Monday morning.

Comments (8)

 

Tessa 07.04.2014 23:23

The Supreme Court has been compromised just like the rest of our government so don't hold your breath waiting for a ruling in favor of peoples rights. I'm sure something important regarding gay rights will be taken on though.

 

Q 07.04.2014 19:25

Gary David 07.04.2014 16:07

system in power no longer answers to the people, Rights taken away for the cause of unabated and economic war being waged by corporate powers who wish to run the entire world eventually. 1st and 2nd amendment rights no longer honored by corrupt 1% rulers and their many minions. My country that I love is indeed under total chaos .

  


On ly difference is the criminals are no longer sneaky than in the past. Your government manipulated you for much longer time against your will.

 

james greer 07.04.2014 18:30

Can you image in your mind, NYC a vast waste land? its going to happen.

View all comments (8)
Add comment

Authorization required for adding comments

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

OK

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

X

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us

Follow us