Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.

 

Senator: CISPA creates a Cyber Industrial Complex

Published time: May 22, 2012 18:29
Edited time: May 22, 2012 22:29
US Senator Ron Wyden (AFP Photo / Nicholas Kamm)

A senior US lawmaker with 30 years experience in Congress came out hard against CISPA this week, attacking the legislation’s creators for drafting a bill that erodes Internet privacy for Americans.

Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Oregon) condemned the supporters of the Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act (CISPA) from Capitol Hill on Monday, blaming the bill’s backers for approving legislation that he suggests would do little to thwart cyber terrorism that instead would alienate Americans by being far-too encompassing and poorly architected.

If signed into law, CISPA will allow federal agencies to comb through the personal information and intimate correspondence of anyone in America while also providing protecting to private businesses for aiding in the partnership. The act was drafted under the guise of being a necessity to conquer cyber terrorism but has attracted opponents critical of many of the law’s provisions that hinder free speech and eliminate privacy.

Earlier this year, the US House of Representatives approved CISPA and soon the US Senate will weigh in on the bill. Congress is currently in the midst of considering a plethora of cybersecurity bills to combat a potential attack on America’s online infrastructure that has been all but guaranteed by some of the country’s lawmakers.

On Monday, Sen. Wyden made it clear that he was also one of many opposed to CISPA and other cybersecurity legislation, calling them, “an overreaction to a legitimate fear.”

“It is a fundamental principle of cyber-security that any network whose failure could result in loss of life or significant property should be physically isolated from the Internet,” the senator told his fellow representatives. “Unfortunately many of our critical network operators have violated this principle in order to save money or streamline operations. This sort of gross negligence should be the first target in any cyber-security program – not the privacy of individual Americans.”

Further, Sen. Wyden suggested that implementing the laws drafted under CISPA could create “a Cyber Industrial Complex” that would allow the federal government and its Big Business cohorts to profit off of the personal info of any American with an Internet connection.

Sen. Wyden stressed that, if passed, CISPA will fall short of what its authors hope for because it will drive American citizens away from the Internet.Attacking the bill, the lawmaker said that passing the legislation would be “a recipe to stifle speech, innovation, job creation, and social progress.”

“The American people will respond by limiting their online activities,” predicted the senator.

“I believe these bills will encourage the development of a cyber security industry

that profits from fear and whose currency is Americans private data. These bills create a Cyber Industrial Complex that has an interest in preserving the problem to which it is the solution,” he said.

“Our job is to write a cyber-security bill that protects Americans’ security and their fundamental right to privacy,” continued the senator. “There is no sound policy reason to sacrifice the privacy rights of law abiding American citizens in the name of cyber-security and I will fight any legislation that asks this Senate to make that choice.”

Sen. Wyden is but the latest elected official to publically trash the controversial cybersecurity bill. Presidential hopeful Congressman Ron Paul (R-Texas) attacked the bill earlier this year by saying it was “Big Brother writ” that exemplified “the federal government’s insatiable desire to control the Internet.” Additionally, the White House has on several instanced reported that the administration’s top advisors will recommend that President Barack Obama vetoes the bill if it makes it to his desk, although the commander-in-chief has fallen short of going on the record to vow as such. The future of the bill in the eyes of the Obama administration is now particularly uncertain following last week’s unexpected resignation of the White House’s cybersecurity coordinator, Howard A. Schmidt, who strongly advocated against CISPA.

Comments (8)

JusL (unregistered) 11.07.2012 07:55

Tomorrow it will be a military industrial cyber complex.

+2

Undo

Stan Islavski (unregistered) 10.07.2012 06:59

The web in the US has been monitored from the begining- read your ISP EULA.  what Obama signed in the EO was merely a codification of what has been largely policy from the begining.  Just like much of the PATRIOT Act.  If people in America still think the US is a free country- why are they not asking why the TSA treats the average citizen or guest to the country  just like people are treated in prison? 

The ultimate goal with all of the "administrative law" is simply to make the Internet in the US to be as vaccuous and worthless as most of the broadcast media, cable and satellite. 

While Hollywood and the record industries whines about losing potential sales neither group of intellectual and moral derilects really never would have gotten in the first place.   The people who could truly be profitting from such an action is the adult film industry which is more profitable than the studios of Hollywood.  The adult film industry is as prolific as Bollywood could ever hope to be- which is something that always made Hollywood and Pinewood look like overpriced fluff.

 Disc onnect Cable TV, or satelite TV and either stream foreign broadcasts while you can that originate from other countries.  Some of them may give you incentive to study a foreign language as well- because all that is left when the internet becomes just like Cable TV,  is the foreign broadcasts on Short Wave, and even that is threatened.   

The Soviet era of Russia might be over for the most part, but it has only just begun here in the US far more extensively than it was achieved in the old USSR.  After all- who truly believes their local weather forecasts these days?  I don't- they are wrong much of the time, which was the case with old Soviet era maps city maps.  The west was paranoid about the Soviets gaining technology- those countries that made up the Soviet Union all have it now, as well as China in spite of the corporate espionage being done by the NSA.

0

Undo

Last Bastion (unregistered) 26.05.2012 21:51

Ron Paul has been fighting for the rights of the citizens for decades, and the mainstream media still tries to marginalize and denigrate him. It is inspiring to see the people actually stick up for him, fight for his causes.
ronpaulit ic.com

+9

Undo

View all comments (8)
Add comment

By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our Posting rules

Log in to comment in full, or comment anonymously under character-limit restriction.

100 Text

– required fields

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us