Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.

 

NSA confidence shaken since Snowden leaks began - report

Published time: December 10, 2013 01:11
AFP Photo / Mandel Ngan

AFP Photo / Mandel Ngan

Morale at the US National Security Agency has plummeted since the Edward Snowden leak made international headlines and inspired an ongoing wave of criticism against the intelligence agency – news that coincides with the publication of more NSA documents.

Six months after the first Snowden documents were published in the Guardian and the Washington Post, the NSA has become an object of scorn both at home in the US and internationally. A number of anonymous sources have since told the Post that a lack of support from President Obama has further impacted morale at the agency. One official said confidence within the NSA is “bad overall.”

The news – the Snowden disclosures – it questions the integrity of the NSA workforce,” he said. “It's become very public and very personal. Literally, neighbors are asking people, 'Why are you spying on Grandma?' And we aren't. People are feeling bad, beaten down.”

Some observers have compared the current situation to 2006, when then-President Bush traveled to NSA headquarters at Fort Meade to address a New York Times report that the NSA had been spying on Americans before the September 11 attacks.

Bush came out and spoke to the workforce, and the effect on morale was tremendous,” Joel Brenner, NSA inspector general from 2002-2006, told the Post. “There's been nothing like that from this White House.

The agency, from top to bottom, leadership to rank and file, feels that it is had no support from the White House even though it's been carrying out publicly approved intelligence missions,” Brenner continued. “They feel they've been hung out to dry, and they're right.”

The President's reluctance could be attributable to the political message a visit to Fort Meade would send. Obama has publicly asserted that, despite their past secrecy, the bulk data collection programs are fully legal – with his most notable defense coming in a speech in favor of the government's massive collection of Verizon phone records.

Yet the administration has not endorsed a bill that would entrench that policy into law and Obama said in a recent interview that he will propose some “self-restraint” depending on the results of an investigation into the NSA programs.

The President has multiple constituencies – I get it,” one former US official said. “But he must agree that the signals intelligence NSA is providing is one of the most important sources of intelligence today.”

Confronted with reports of NSA employees openly complaining about the President, White House spokeswoman Caitlin Hayden told the Post that multiple administration officials have visited to “express the President’s support and appreciation for all that NSA does to keep us safe.”

The President has the highest respect for and pride in the men and women of the intelligence community who work tirelessly to protect our nation,” Hayden went on. “He's expressed that directly to NSA's leadership and has praised their work in public. As he said: 'The men and women of our intelligence community work every single day to keep us safe because they love this country and believe in our values. They're patriots.'”

Yet the pressure appears unlikely to subside any time soon. An NSA document dated April 3, 2013 obtained by CBC News has revealed that Canada has built surveillance centers and launched espionage attacks at the NSA's request. Citing matters that would be harmful to Canadian national security, CBC did not publish details on the document but did note that it reveals the existence of a secret, 60-year-old intelligence partnership between the US and Canada.

Comments (34)

 

Lucifer Vigilo 16.12.2013 15:43

Someone really needs to up and let these criminals know that no one gives a flying shi t about their "feelings" and that the sooner they start to off themselves out of guilt/shame the better.

 

Regula 14.12.2013 09:21

There is spying for national security and then there is snooping, intervening, hacking into private computers, misusing the spying capacities to surveil private citizens for corrupt purposes; listening in on other nations's corporations and nationalized companies for the purpose of getting an illegal advantage in contract negotiations, of getting insider knowledge for stock trade etc. When a spying company abuses its discretion so blatantly as the NSA has, the deserve to be dismantled, not given pep talk by the president.

 

Peter 13.12.2013 22:09

well all the money spent does make us safe. Change the money so people are not hungry and will not do crime by helping rather than killing humanity

View all comments (34)
Add comment

Authorization required for adding comments

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

OK

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

X

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us