Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.


Cleanup of major toxic waste sites an ‘inefficient,’ unaccountable ‘shell game’

Published time: March 17, 2014 23:15
Edited time: March 18, 2014 03:52
Reuters / Aly Song

Reuters / Aly Song

Energy-intensive cleanup efforts at toxic-waste sites in the US government’s Superfund program ultimately amount to a shell game, where poisonous materials are constantly shuffled between treatment plants, all as harmful waste multiplies with each step.

Tracking noxious material that is removed from Superfund areas – or uncontrolled hazardous waste sites the US government has dedicated resources to cleaning – beyond the first stop is basically futile, much less can the country’s environmental regulators actually succeed in reducing toxic waste or curbing new health and environmental hazards created by such efforts.

In attempting to assess what even regulators say is beyond their capacity – or interest – a new report from The Center for Investigative Reporting and the Guardian found that the modern process of rehabilitating toxic sites is costly, inefficient, and, since “waste begets waste,” basically hopeless.

The investigation uses toxic water pools deep underneath California’s Silicon Valley – the pools are part of three Superfund sites known as Middlefield-Ellis-Whisman Study Area – as a fairly typical scenario among 1,300 nationwide Superfund cleanup efforts.

Below the pristine campuses of the likes of Google Inc. and Symantec Corp., "pipes and pumps suck thousands of gallons of contaminated water every hour from vast" underground basins into massive industrial filters that attempt to remove dangerous chemicals from groundwater at the surface. This is only the beginning, investigators write.

“Once it leaves Mountain View, Calif., the toxic waste gets shipped, treated and burned in places like Oklahoma and Arizona, discharging waste in small towns and on a Native American reservation, and in some cases creating even more harmful chemicals, The Center for Investigative Reporting has found.”

“Along the way, waste treatment plants rack up environmental violations, records show. Byproducts created during treatment are shuttled from one plant to another. And then another. After crisscrossing the country, the waste even can end up right back where it started – at a treatment plant just a few miles away in Silicon Valley.”

The report states that it would take 700 years of constant treatment to make the groundwater under parts of Silicon Valley drinkable once again.

“There’s really no such thing as throwing something away,” US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) spokesman Rusty Harris-Bishop told The Center for Investigative Reporting. “You’re always throwing it somewhere.”

Once lethal waste is hauled out of an area, federal environmental regulators are finished with tracking it. To construct such an unprecedented investigation, the news outlets said they had to piece together “hazardous waste shipping documents, company records, environmental violations and scientific studies.”

“It’s not that we don’t care about the material,” said Carlos Pachon, EPA administrator for waste cleanup. “We just don’t have control over it."

The report goes on to paint an increasingly grim picture of industrial-level chemical use and the processes that aim to get rid of toxic elements before environmental contamination and, ultimately, human consumption.

For instance, the report says, “waste begets waste.”

“At every step along the trail, treatment leaves behind a new batch of waste that needs to be shipped somewhere else. At one stop, a plant in Wisconsin creates more waste than it takes in.”

Waste treatment also causes the emission of contaminants like cancer-causing dioxins and other “dirty dozen” chemicals.

“The superheating used to release toxic chemicals gives way to an equally alarming danger that isn’t monitored: dioxins. After they escape the plants, dioxins can build up in the food supply and have been linked to cancer and birth defects.”

Despite its good intentions, the Superfund treatment system is grossly inefficient.

“For every 5 pounds of contaminants pulled from the ground, roughly 20,000 pounds of carbon dioxide are produced from continually running pumps, cross-country treks and treatment plants that produce as much greenhouse gas as municipal power plants.”

Ultimately, the Superfund program’s goal is seemingly out of reach.

“Cleanup at the Silicon Valley site, and others like it, isn’t working. Over the past decade, the pollution there has remained stagnant despite constant pumping. In some cases, the treatment is actually increasing the pollution in the water.”

And the costs of waste treatment are high. Sites like the Silicon Valley sites will, by EPA estimates, require between $1.2 billion and $3.6 billion over the next 30 years.

There are 450 other Superfund sites like the Silicon Valley sites, where soiled groundwater is so complicated to clean that “experts have lost faith in the technology used to clean it up.”

Comments (6)


DS 18.03.2014 10:40

Marc420 got it right. Then corporations donate money to campaigns and get favors to put their guy into the regulatory spot-or an incompetent. Republicans cut the regulator budgets making it impossible to monitor. Later when errors like BP Gulf spill happen a charm campaign begins. America is now fracking Mother Earth. The water will be undrinkable long after America is gone. I dont even want to think about the nuclear plants chugging their poisons out. Now GMO. We are irrepairably poisoning earth.


Phil Brindley 18.03.2014 10:35

Look what happened when Chevron released all the toxic sludge in to the Ecuadorian jungle! I f you don't know they were ordered to pay $18 billion compensation by an Ecuadorian judge and then recently had that verdict annulled by an American judge. They will do the same in america, hence that's why they are chemtrailing the pacific to alter the jet stream that causes drought in California and melts the polar ice at the same time to make oil easier to get to!


Marc420 18.03.2014 10:17

If you want to understand America, this is it. Notice of course that the companies that originally created the environmental disaster aren't paying to clean it up. They've made their profits and moved on. That's America. We let any corporation make money by dumping the costs and in this case health effects off onto the American people. The laws and regs are rigged that way. Like the one that tells the EPA they can't track the toxic waste they just cleaned from a superfund site. Taxpayers take corporate losses, while they keep the profits for themselves. Its not free enterprise.

View all comments (6)
Add comment

Authorization required for adding comments

Register or



Show password


or Register

Request a new password


or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:


or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile



New password

Retype new password

Current password



Follow us

Follow us