Texas executed mentally disabled prisoner

Published time: August 08, 2012 16:19
Edited time: August 08, 2012 20:19
 Mravin Wilson

A medically diagnosed “mentally retarded” prisoner was executed by lethal injection in Texas, even though a 2002 Supreme Court ruling deemed him ineligible for the death penalty.

On Tuesday, the lawyers of 54-year old Marvin Wilson petitioned the Supreme Court for a stay of execution, which would give additional time to prove the man’s disability, but the Court rejected the appeal just two hours before he was scheduled to receive lethal injection.

The Texas judge considered the man a “street-savvy criminal” for his involvement in the 1992 murder of a police drug informant.

At 6:27 pm, Wilson was executed before his friends and family.

“Give mom a hug for me and tell her that I love her,” he cried out. Before he was given the injection, Wilson smiled and nodded his head at his three sisters as they watched him through the window of the death-chamber gurney.

Wilson told his son not to cry and promised his family he would see them again.

Take me home, Jesus. Take me home, Lord,” he prayed, as the lethal injection seeped through his veins. “I ain’t left yet, must be a miracle. I am a miracle.”

It took 14 minutes for Wilson to fall into an endless sleep.

The murder victim’s family stood watching from an adjacent window. Ten years ago, Wilson and accomplice Terry Lewis were convicted of murdering 21-year-old Jerry Williams in Houston, several days after Wilson was arrested for possessing 24 grams of cocaine.

After Wilson was released on bond, he accused Williams of snitching on him about the drugs and shot him in the head and neck.

But while the convicted murderer was on death row, Texas state officials diagnosed him as mentally retarded. With an IQ of 61, he fell below the 70 point benchmark that classifies someone as ineligible to be executed.

Wilson grew up to be called a “dummy” at school and failed his special education classes. He struggled to tie his shoes, count money, get dressed and mow the lawn. Wilson also sucked his thumb into his 20s.

In 2002, the US Constitution ruled that “no person with mental retardation is eligible for the death penalty.” The execution of the mentally retarded was declared cruel and unusual punishment forbidden under the Eighth Amendment, and Wilson’s lawyers insisted this should apply to the defendant.

But even though one test proved Wilson to have mental retardation, the Texas Court for Criminal Appeals made its ruling based on a fictional character from John Steinbeck’s novel, “Of Mice and Men.” The court claims that anyone less impaired than the character Lennie Smalls should receive no constitutional protection from execution by the state.

The son of the author expressed outrage at the use of his father’s novel.

“Prior to reading about Mr. Wilson’s case, I had no idea that the great state of Texas would use a fictional character that my father created to make a point about human loyalty and dedication… as a benchmark to identify whether defendants with an intellectual disability should live or die,” Thomas Steinbeck told the Huffington Post. “I am certain that if my father, John Steinbeck, were here, he would be deeply angry and ashamed to see his work used in this way.”

The Supreme Court leaves it up to states to decide whether or not someone is considered mentally retarded.

Since the Texas Courtt, which called Wilson “street-savvy,” did not consider him exempt, the 54-year-old was lethally injected in the state that administers the most executions almost every year.

Comments (16)

Merideth Maxwell (unregistered) 01.11.2012 16:41

I'm an advocate for death row prisoners, and I feel the death penalty needs serious reform in our country, but I despise articles like this that 1) attack the state of Texas as if the Court of Criminal Appeals didn't adequately try this man, and 2) provide blatantly false information in order to inflame those who don't have legal educations and who unfortuantely will probably not look up the claim to corroborate what this article has said.

To clarify what I meant in 2), the "benchmark" for determining if someone is mentally retarded for the purposes of barring the death penalty as a punishment is not as simple as scoring under 70 on an IQ test. Can you imagine the number of inmates who would be taken off death row if this were the case.

The FACT is that there are a number of criteria that states use to determine whether a prisoner on death row is mentally retarded, and although many states vary, they have to follow guidelines for establishing the criteria. Yes, one is IQ, but it's just not that simple.  Many states, for example, use the AAMR definition:

T he common elements of the AAMR definitions address the three components of the concept of mental retardation: (1) substantial intellectual impairment; (2) impact of that impairment on everyday life of the individual; and (3) appearance of the disability at birth or during the person’s childhood. Unless an individual meets all three requirements, he does not fall  within the definition of mental retardation.

Maybe some of these pseudo journalists will start actually doing some research so they know what they are talking about before they start making invalid claims.

0

Undo

BloodyNora 11.10.2012 12:44

What's the surprise - it's America - a land of war mongering hegemonic racists and fascists whose judiciary are daily bought and sold by vested interests and whose politicians' only care is re-election to the trough and are bought and sold by foreign governments.  We are told that the American people are sick of the carnage (of waR.)  There is no paradox here.  The death penalty is clearly just an internally applied extension by some states of US foreign policy - routinely used  to kill poor, non-white people.

+1

Undo

pschase (unregistered) 10.10.2012 13:13

Speed Racist! ha, It doesn't take much to bring the yahoo's out. If they decide to start killing "retards" then a bunch of you in the comments here better watch out. The "land of the free" is in trouble and it goes much higher than small time drug dealers and users.

0

Undo

View all comments (16)
Add comment

By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our Posting rules

Log in to comment in full, or comment anonymously under character-limit restriction.

100 Text

– required fields

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us