Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.

 

Texas judge halts construction of Keystone XL pipeline

Published time: December 11, 2012 16:15
Edited time: December 11, 2012 20:15
A group of demonstrators rally against the controversial Keystone XL oil pipeline. (Reuters / Stephen Lam)

TransCanada has been ordered by a Texas judge to cease construction on part of its controversial Keystone XL pipeline expected to run from Alberta, Canada to the Gulf of Mexico.

Texas County Court at Law Judge Jack Sinz has granted a temporary restraining order and injunction that favors Michael Bishop, a landowner whose 20-acre property outside of Houston, TX is in the path of the massive oil pipe project.

Judge Sinz’s injunction went into effect Tuesday morning and will last through December 19, at which point a court will reconvene to consider Bishop’s case.

According to the plaintiff, TransCanada misled Texans when it asked them to open their property up for the pipeline. Bishop, 64, says TransCanada pitched the project as a pipeline that would carry crude oil from the north into the gulf when they convinced landowners to sign off on construction, but now he thinks they weren’t being just.

In Texas, crude oil is defined in state and federal statutory codes as "liquid hydrocarbons extracted from the earth at atmospheric temperatures," Bishop tells the Associated Press. Since the oil extracted in Alberta is nearly solid from the start and must be “heated and diluted in order to even be transmitted,” Bishop says he was asked to agree on something completely different.

"They lied to the American people," Bishop, a Vietnam War veteran, tells AP.

On their part, TransCanada insists that US courts have already ruled in their favor during previous cases and concluded that tar sands is a form of crude oil. Bishop warns that he won’t go down easy, though.

"Bring 'em on. I'm a United States Marine. I'm not afraid of anyone. I'm not afraid of them," Bishop tells the AP. "When I'm done with them, they will know that they've been in a fight. I may not win, but I'm going to hurt them."

The Keystone XL pipeline has been marred with controversy since well before the first shovel was used to start construction. Although the project will have to eventually connected the US with Canada, President Barack Obama has refused to grant the proper permits to TransCanada for their most recent proposed route over concerns that it will disturb protected land in Nebraska.

Earlier this month, activists in Texas were arrested for barricading themselves inside part of the pipeline during construction.

"This fight in East Texas against tar sands exploitation is one and the same as our fight in the hollers of West Virginia. Dirty energy extraction doesn’t just threaten my home; it threatens the collective future of the planet,” activist Glen Collins told Common Dreams of why he risked arrest.

Comments (4)

juda (unregistered) 12.12.2012 00:03

usa.......SLOPPER, HAPPYWHACK, and GO CANADA:  Give it to China.Is this the Day for Canadian Trolls from the Oil Corpies?? TEXAS:  So good to hear a good story about Texas!  Yes, this is the GOOD FIGHT!  Duke 'em up!!! Not only have people's private property from Canada  thru the U.S.A been invaded and the people's rights been violated and the management people treating these people as if they are nothing ---the waters are at risk!  Pipe break now, tomorrow, next week, next year?  Toxins will flow through the Nation's waters as with Fracking also.  People just drink the kool-aid rather than work to wrap their brain around this and what it means.  Holdin' up a Yellow Rose to ya Texas!!!!

0

Undo

Slopper (unregistered) 11.12.2012 19:40

It's either the US take that slop from canada or they give it to the chinese, which is better?

0

Undo

Josh B. 11.12.2012 18:48

Tar sands are ridiculously ecologically destructive, the chemically laden water that results as a byproduct of the on site processing seeps into reservoirs and natural waterways, mutating fish and polluting drinking water sources for humans and animals. The abrasive nature of sand guarantees pipeline leaks. This isn't speculation, there are numerous examples of this taking place. Not to mention, the forrest clear cutting required at the extraction site and along the length of the pipeline. These people have been coerced into signing the contracts with threats that the land would be taken if necessary under eminent domain, its about time a "civil servant" stepped up to fill their role and at least pause the exploitation.Tar sands aren't progress. Renewable, non-destructive energy is progress. Enough energy is provided to the Earth by the sun in one day to satisfy the entirety of our requirements for a year. There's also wind generated power. The global oil racket is responsible for the inhibition of progress and energy independence, not these people.

+1

Undo

View all comments (4)
Add comment

By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our Posting rules

Log in to comment in full, or comment anonymously under character-limit restriction.

100 Text

– required fields

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us