Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.

 

Breaking news

FBI director admits domestic use of drones

Stealing a US election? Nothing’s easier!

Published time: October 05, 2012 21:28
Edited time: October 06, 2012 01:28
Electronic voting machines
Download video (32.6 MB)
Embed

The US prides itself on a free and fair election system. It’s the main hallmark of democracy. But as RT’s Anastasia Churkina reports, stealing an election in America is easier than 1,2,3.

The U.S. – a beacon of democracy, and an example to be followed by the rest of the world. One big source of pride is its' fundamental concept of free and fair elections.

“American elections are a disgrace. It's like looking into a kitchen of a world-class restaurant and losing your appetite at what you see, because we have an election system, a voting system that is completely non-transparent,” said Mark Crispin Miller, Professor at NYU and author of “Fooled Again, How the Right Stole the 2004 Elections.”

This is an opinion shared by many political experts and educators.

“If you were to hand your vote to a man in a magician's suit who then went behind a curtain and came out having first shredded the ballots, to tell you who won – would you trust that process?” said the co-founder and director of the Election Defense Alliance Jonathan, Simon.

The process largely to blame is the out-dated electronic voting system.

“In the states where all they have is electronic voting – it could be a real problem. If you don't have some kind of back up source to verify the vote count – it could be a problem,”said Jeanne Mirer of the National Lawyers Guild.

Brad Friedman is an independent award-winning blogger who has covered the U.S. election system for years. Speaking to RT, he said the problem is actually a pandemic, and change is long overdue.

“Every single state in the union uses electronic voting. A third of the voters this year will vote on 100 percent unverifiable touch screen voting systems. The rest of the country, by and large, will vote on paper ballots, but those paper ballots are also counted by electronic systems. Unless you can see inside a computer, there is no way to know if those computers have tallied those ballots correctly,” said Friedman.

Several experiments conducted on electronic voting machines have proven that simple key strokes and some knowledge of science and computers could flip results. Experts say the accuracy of the vote count – even with paper trail – is a myth.

“In 99 plus percent of the cases, those ballots never see the light of day – they are never examined, never recounted. Basically American elections at this point have virtually zero claim on public confidence and legitimacy,” said Jonathan Simon.

The rules and specifications of how elections are held vary locally, and state by state.

“Four-thousand different counties, each of them use a different system, a different type of voting system, each of them have different flaws, different vulnerabilities,” said Brad Friedman.

One particular company that makes electronic voting machines in the U.S. has earned a dubious reputation for unverifiable results, as records vanish into thin air.

“I go to an ATM, and there is a Diebold machine, I get a confirmation slip – and I go around the corner to vote – and there is no record,” said author, social critic and political activist Naomi Wolf.

Meantime, Diebold and other voter machine production companies are known to have strong partisan affiliations.

“They are not accountable to any voters. They are not just private, but private and extreme in their political sympathies. Democrats don't actually win that many elections. To be precise, democrats almost never win close elections. And the trick there, is to see to it, that a race looks or is close,” said Mark Crispin Miller.

Improving the election process in this digital age doesn’t appear to be on anyone’s agenda, including Barack Obama’s.

“Our President…who won't ever talk about election fraud and denies that it has ever happened, even when members of his own party have been the victims of it,” said Miller.

While the number of reported flaws grows with each passing election.

“Over the past decade, since 2000, when Congress was pretending to want to make things better, what has happened is things have gotten much, much worse,” said Brad Friedman.

It appears stealing an election in the U.S. may be a candidate’s certain way to secure a win.

In this digital age of smart phones, tablets and satellite navigation systems, American voters will head to the polls this November to cast their ballots using antiquated and unreliable voting machines, machines that will ultimately determine who will lead this nation in much need of its own repairs.

Comments (36)

ROMNEY: DISHONEST LIAR (unregistered) 09.10.2012 15:24

Romney's sudden turn to the center is an inside joke over at the RNC. Once he wins the election they coo, Romney will swing hard right taking the new justices to the Supreme Court with him. Obama needs to take a cue from Romney and up his game. Lying in American politics is totally acceptable. The mainstream media will not call politicians out on it. If they do, it will be all forgotten in one day. So, Obama had better be a better liar than Romney if he wants to win. The American electorate just processes debates and sound bytes. Dumb, dumber, dumbest = American electorate.

0

Undo

CDR (unregistered) 09.10.2012 07:24

Virtually all elections anywhere in the world can be rigged, and most are. Voter fraud is rife in Britain, especially where the postal voting system is concerned. Unless electoral systems are ruthlessly overhauled, the elite will continue rigging them to form the types of government that THEY want, and not what WE want. Ballot boxes can be lost en route to the counting houses; those counting the votes can be bribed; in the UK in 2010 people were refused ballot papers even though they had entered the voting chambers before the cut-off time of 10pm. There are just too many scenarios where meddling can take place.
The people are stuffed at every turn right now.

0

Undo

Lizzy (unregistered) 09.10.2012 02:53

Is lying to win a US election a form of theft even before considering actual voter fraud? Most definitely. I recall an interview with Newt Gingrich by Norah O'Donnell in January of this year. There Gingrich directly called Romney a liar: Norah O'Donnell: You said of Mitt Romney, someone who will lie to you to get to be president will lie to you when they are president. I have to ask you, are you calling Mitt Romney a liar? Gingrich: Yes.Norah O'Donnell: You said of Mitt Romney, someone who will lie to you to get to be president will lie to you when they are president. I have to ask you, are you calling Mitt Romney a liar? Gingrich: Yes.

0

Undo

View all comments (36)
Add comment

By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our Posting rules

Log in to comment in full, or comment anonymously under character-limit restriction.

100 Text

– required fields

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us