Breaking news

Man, woman arrested on suspicion of conspiracy to murder in Woolwich attack

85 shots: US cops use more ammo per man than Germans per year

Published time: May 11, 2012 17:34
Edited time: May 12, 2012 02:25
Woman marches with sign during protest march for justice in police shooting death of Sean Bell in New York (Reuters / Mike Segar)

Eighty-five shots: That’s the total number of bullets German police used in all of 2011, Der Spiegel reports. But what does it say when US cops use as much ammo to bring down one man as German cops need to keep the peace nationwide?

The rate at which German police discharged their firearms is further underscored by how rarely they shot with fatal intent.  Of the 85 bullets used in 2011, 49 were warnings shots, 36 were aimed at criminal suspects, 15 people were injured, and 6 were killed, the German daily continues.

The statistics prove "our police officers are not thugs in uniform,”Christian Democratic insider Lorenz Caffier said. 

And when comparing Germany with the United States, another story altogether appears. Although police in the United States have to file a report every time they use their firearm in the line of duty, either through sheer volume or disinterest, no statistics are readily available on the amount of ammunition used annually. But though the number of shell casings spent by the boys in blue has not been tallied, there are other indicators that something is amiss when it comes to state-sponsored violence in the US. The US population is almost four times that of Germany's, yet its level of police violence is exponentially higher.

The trigger-happy nature of US cops was perhaps best epitomized in the controversial 2001 Bruce Springsteen song "American Skin (41 Shots)." The song recounts the 1999 shooting death of an unarmed 23-year-old Guinean immigrant in New York City. The victim, Amadou Diallo, as the song title alludes, was shot 41 times by four plain-clothed police officers outside of his apartment. And Diallo's case is anything but anomalous in today's America.

Last month, Los Angeles Police killed a 19-year-old man after unloading over 90 shots on him following a high-speed chase down an area freeway. The same month, New York police fired at a suspected murderer 84 times.  While the man was wounded, “the punk incredibly survived,” the New York Post reports.

Protesters carry a banner as they cross New York′s Brooklyn Bridge into Manhattan April 15 to protest 1999 shooting death of Amadou Diallo (REUTERS/Mike Segar)
Protesters carry a banner as they cross New York's Brooklyn Bridge into Manhattan April 15 to protest 1999 shooting death of Amadou Diallo (REUTERS/Mike Segar)

In 2011, Miami police unloaded their magazines on a reckless Memorial Day driver who had hit several other vehicles. Over 100 rounds later, the driver was killed and seven innocent bystanders were injured in the shooting. Another excessive case occurred in 2006, when a ten-member Florida SWAT team mowed down cop-killer Angilo Freeland in a hail of bullets – 110, to be exact. Polk Country Sheriff Grady Judd nonchalantly told the Orlando Sentinel,

"That's all the bullets we had."

In another 2006 six case, plain clothes and undercover New York police shot at Sean Bell more than 50 times a day before his wedding. Bell was killed, and three of his friends were critically injured. The case was widely compared to that of Diallo.

The phenomenon is so common in America that the term ‘contagious shooting’ – the idea that cops reflexively open fire because others are doing so – has entered the national vocabulary.

Perhaps one incident that spurred experts to coin the term was a 1995 Bronx robbery where officers fired an incredible 125 shots at a suspect who did not even fire back. “They were shooting to the echo of their own gunfire,” a former police official told The New York Times.  
One officer told the daily in 2006 that “the only reason to be shooting in New York City is that you or someone else is going to be killed and it’s going to be imminent,” and thus you fire as many shots as necessary to “extinguish the threat.”

Ironically, one officer even said “until we have some substitute for a firearm, there will always be a situation where more rounds are fired than in other situations.”

However, even when tasers presented a non-lethal alternative, the bodies kept piling up.  Between 2001 and early 2012, Amnesty International estimated that law enforcement killed 500 people with the device.

­While statistics concerning the total number of cop-inflicted deaths over the last several years are unavailable, a November 2011 US Department of Justice report entitled  ‘Arrest Related Deaths , 2003-2009’ says “a total of 4,813 [arrest-related] deaths were reported to the Bureau of Justice Statistics.” The report further says that “about 6 in 10 deaths (2,931) were classified as homicide by law enforcement personnel, and 4 in 10 (1,882) were attributed to other manners of death.”

But then, the United States is a violent place. In 2009 alone, the US Center For Disease Control and Prevention says 16,799 people were murdered, with 11,493 of those deaths inflicted by a firearm. A further 1.8 million assault-related emergency room visits were reported in the same year.

However, despite those figures, violent crime has significantly dropped over the last 20 years, with murder and robbery rates halving from 1991-98.

But while citizens commit fewer crimes annually, US law enforcement have become increasingly militarized in the post-9/11 world. In fact, instances of excessive force or “other tactics to violate victims civil rights” increased by 25 per cent from 2001 to 2007, USA Today reported.  
With nearly three million US citizens behind bars, cop-related violence on the rise, contagious shooting sprees ever-present and non-lethal weapons being used to deadly effect, 85 is a number that should send shockwaves through the land of the free.

Comments (24)

Wilson Boozer (unregistered) wrote in #1 (unregistered) 12.01.2013 22:04

"On the tube, cops are always depicted as noble creatures, who never fire their guns unless it is in defense of helpless citizens or in order to save their lives. You will never see a cop shoot an unarmed man in the back, as happened to Aaron Campbell in Portland, or break down the door of an old man in order to plug him, as happened to Kenneth Chamberlain in White Plains, New York. You will never see successful prosecution against cops for murder by the Federal Government, as happened not once, but twice this year in New Orleans. And these are only two citations among many. I wonder how many of the surfeit of such shows are paid for by the police unions to create this fiction?"  _____ ____________________ ____________________ __________ The fact is that Feds are impotent, both FBI and Justice Dept are defacto mere support groups at service of various local and State Police Agencies throughout Anglo-Irish Empire's American Colony.

0

Undo

s.Daniel 07.10.2012 14:45

@Dave: You are mistaken if you think of Germany as anything near mono-cultural. Germany has the highest rate of foreigners in whole europe. http://tran slate.google.de/tran slate?hl=de&sl=auto& tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2 Fwww.welt.de%2Fpolit ik%2Fdeutschland%2Fa rticle9475620%2FKein -EU-Land-hat-mehr-Au slaender-als-Deutsch land.html
Also what you are saying does not make much sense as an argument that police officers should loose more or less bullets on individuals.
It's probably as simple as that: German police is rather trained to use their brains first while american cops are rather trained to use their gun first.
I have lived in both countries and I like a lot of things about the US. But in the end I am happy to live in Germany now, where it's far from perfect but a lot less insecure, stupid and violent. 

0

Undo

Dave (unregistered) 06.10.2012 02:54

Another point that I didn't see being made is that Germany is not as multi-cultural/racia l as many places here in the U.S. are. If you break down where the overall vast majority of violent crime is commited here in the U.S. it is in larger metro urban areas. studies have shown that multi-culturism and multi-raical coexistance by its very nature causes natural elevations of stress, hormones, and psychological disorders.
This is also why when you see top 10 lists of "best", "safest", "friendliest", etc. countries they are dominated by countries whose demographics are skewed towards a nearly mono-cultural/ racial identity.

0

Undo

View all comments (24)
Add comment

By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our Posting rules

Log in to comment in full, or comment anonymously under character-limit restriction.

100 Text

– required fields

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us