Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.


Bombing Syria would make US pilots ‘Al-Qaeda's air force’ – Kucinich

Published time: August 28, 2013 15:08
Edited time: August 29, 2013 11:03
A picture released by the US Navy shows Aviation Boatswain's Mate (Handling) 2nd Class Christiana Marszalek signaling as an AV-8B Harrier takes off from the amphibious assault ship USS Kearsarge (LHD 3) on March 29, 2013 in the Mediterranean Sea. (AFP Photo/US NAVY/Corbin Shea)

A picture released by the US Navy shows Aviation Boatswain's Mate (Handling) 2nd Class Christiana Marszalek signaling as an AV-8B Harrier takes off from the amphibious assault ship USS Kearsarge (LHD 3) on March 29, 2013 in the Mediterranean Sea. (AFP Photo/US NAVY/Corbin Shea)

A 'targeted strike' on Syria by the US would be nothing but an act of war, former Congressman Dennis Kucinich said, adding that an airstrike on President Assad’s anti-radical Islamist forces would mean the US Air Force was supporting Al-Qaeda.

Kucinich, a prominent anti-war politician who has consistently opposed America’s military involvement in Iraq and Libya, warned that President Barack Obama would be violating the US Constitution if he took military action against Syria without authorization from Congress.

An airstrike on Syria would also embolden multinational jihadists with links to Al-Qaeda, warned Kucinich, a four-time Congressman who was a longshot contender for the Democratic presidential nomination in 2004 and 2008. For the US, that would mean being dragged into yet another war in the Middle East, he said.

U.S. Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) (Alex Wong/Getty Images/AFP)

“So what, we're about to become Al-Qaeda's air force now?” said Kucinich. “This is a very, very serious matter that has broad implications internationally. And to try to minimize it by saying we're just going to have a 'targeted strike' — that's an act of war. It's not something to be trifled with.”

Kucinich, who stood down in January after losing the Democratic nomination for his seat in the House of Representatives, said he doubted the allegations that President Assad had used chemical weapons against his own people.

“This is being used as a pretext,” he said. “The verdict is in before the facts have been gathered. What does that tell you?” said Kucinich, adding that the Obama administration was “rushing” toward a possible “World War 3.”

Questions from Congress

While Kucinich is one of the most consistent opponents of US intervention in the Middle East, he is not the only US politician to question military action against Syria.

While US Secretary of State John Kerry has pointed to “undeniable” evidence of Assad's involvement in the chemical attack in Damascus, and White House spokesman Jay Carney has accused Assad of violating “an international standard,” a number of US lawmakers have questioned spoken military strikes on Syria without the issue being brought before Congress.

Rocket launch by the Pantsir-S surface-to-air missile system (RIA Novosti/Mikhail Fomichev)

Twenty-one Republicans and one Democrat have signed onto a House letter to President Obama demanding that any military action must be signed off on by Congress.

“Engaging our military in Syria when no direct threat to the United States exists and without prior congressional authorization would violate the separation of powers that is clearly delineated in the Constitution,” says the letter, which was initiated by Republican Congressman Scott Rigell.

“Before engaging in a military strike against Assad’s forces, the United States must understand that this action will likely draw us into a much wider and much longer-term conflict that could mean an even greater loss of life within Syria,” said Senator Chris Murphy, urging the Obama administration to “continue to exercise restraint, because absent an imminent threat to America’s national security, the U.S. should not take military action without Congressional authorization.”

“Congress must be engaged and we must be sensitive to the needs of the American people and the Syrian people,” Representative Sheila Jackson-Lee said.

The Syrian government has warned that an assault on the country would not be easy for Western powers.

"We have two options: either to surrender, or to defend ourselves with the means at our disposal ,” Foreign Minister Walid Muallem told a televised news conference. “The second choice is the best: we will defend ourselves.”

Comments (30)


Mr Vision 02.11.2013 22:27

Or they know something that the general public doesn't know


Sharon Storm 01.09.2013 02:09

the US has no business funding and supplying Al CIAda or the Taliban or any other group they have ever put on their terrorism watch list. Insane McCain and all the other Israel-firsters should move to Israel and renounce their US citizenships and US gov't positions, sign up (along with their progeny) with the IDF, and pledge their personal fortunes to the cause they love so much! Leave real Americans and our rapidly dwindling wealth alone!!


Davey Jones 31.08.2013 06:52

This is why us American's should stay out of other people biz. We don't know what is really going on. And if we get involved somebody is going to die!

View all comments (30)
Add comment

Authorization required for adding comments

Register or



Show password


or Register

Request a new password


or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:


or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile



New password

Retype new password

Current password



Follow us

Follow us