US accused of creating three more computer super-viruses

Published time: September 17, 2012 19:07
Edited time: September 18, 2012 19:56
Kevork Djansezian / Getty Images / AFP

Two independent teams of researchers studying the Flame computer virus believe that the maker of the malware — all but certain to be the United States — has architected three additional programs to conduct clandestine cyberwar or espionage.

Both Symantec Corp of the United States and Kaspersky Lab of Russia acknowledged on Monday that their research of Flame has led them to believe that whoever had a role in creating that virus has also put their efforts behind three other similar programs.

A team of engineers at Kaspersky released new information on Monday collected during forensic analysis of Flame command-and-Control servers that were examined with the assistance of Symantec, ITU-IMPACT and CERT-Bund/BSI. Researchers had first disclosed in May that Flame, a sophisticated espionage virus, targeted computer systems in Iran and was likely the product of a nation-state, specifically the US. With this week’s update, however, it appears as if the United States’ endeavors in cyberwar may have stretched past even what researchers had imagined.

“Based on the code from the servers, it can be said that they were working with at least three other programs similar to Flame. The code names of those programs are IP, SP and SPE,” Kaspersky Lab chief security expert Aleks Gostev told RT.

Although the United States government has not gone on the record to take credit for either Flame or Stuxnet, a similar computer worm that targeted Iranian nuclear facilities first discovered in 2010, experts have long maintained that the US is involved in both viruses, perhaps even enlisting Israeli scientists for assistance.

Speaking at a TED Talk in 2011, researcher Ralph Langner said, "My opinion is that the Mossad is involved but that the leading force is not Israel. The leading force behind Stuxnet is the cyber superpower – there is only one; and that's the United States."

In January of this year, Mike McConnell, the former director of national intelligence at the National Security Agency under George W Bush, told Reuters that the US had indeed attacked foreign computer systems at one time or another, and confirmed that America has “the ability to attack, degrade or destroy” the e-grids of adversaries. When the New York Times followed up with a report of their own only five months later, members of US President Barack Obama’s national security team admitted on condition of anonymity that the White House continued cyber-assaults on Iran’s nuclear program through Stuxnet, which Mr. Obama himself endorsed.

Once compared with coding from Flame, security experts saw an immediate correlation.

“Stuxnet of 2009 had a large piece of code similar to that of Flame, so apparently creators of Stuxnet and Flame were working in close collaboration,” Gostev from Kaspersky Lab said.

With America all but confirmed as the culprit behind both viruses, this week it’s revealed that the United States may have crafted another three coded programs to target Iran and its allies. Speaking to Reuters, researchers involved in the latest analysis say they are still trying to figure out the basic facts about the three new viruses, but believe that the same entity responsible for Stuxnet and Flame are at it again.

"We know that it is definitely out there. We just can't figure out a way to actually get our hands on it. We are trying," Symantec researcher Vikram Thakur tells Reuters.

Also in their report, Kaspersy say that the heavy encryption and nature of the newest programs “fits the profile of military and/or intelligence operations."

Comments (17)

Korz53 10.11.2012 01:33

yes yes! my computer fell down and could not get up!  

    [Broadway comedy! ha ha ha!] 

0

Undo

C.T. 24.10.2012 09:23

So what the US deems as an agrressive act of war against its netorks, and is viewed as an unilateral act of war, it is busy most likely in cohots with Mossad doing just that on a country they are already attacking economically and covertly through assasinations and if anyone else were doing the same they would brand them terrorists and enemies of democracy and freedom. Dangerous hypcrites as usual. 2013 is looking to be a very dubious year for any meaninful signs of peace.

+1

Undo

joeinslw 06.10.2012 04:02

I am concerned that Netanyahu will start a war and the U.S. will be forced into it if we don't get in right away.  I don't like those TV commercials with Netanyahu say ing that the World says to wait, we have more time, but the woman at the end makes the statement that the U.S. needs to be more involved.  What is Netanyahu askin g for?  More bombs? More money? or all the above?  Obviously he wants it right now, the real question is can we afford to say yes, or can we afford to say no?Making a statement that allowing someone as crazy as ahmadinejad to get a nuke does not mean he really is crazy enough to use it.  Let's not forget about Timothy McVeigh wh o blew up a federal building, and the Feds had no idea of what he was about to do.  It's the quiet ones we have to watch and worry about, and if the U.S. Government didn't know it then, they know it now.

0

Undo

View all comments (17)
Add comment

By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our Posting rules

Log in to comment in full, or comment anonymously under character-limit restriction.

100 Text

– required fields

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us