Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.

 

Washington votes against GMO labeling – preliminary results

Published time: November 06, 2013 04:57
Edited time: November 07, 2013 12:21
An employee stocks produce near a sign supporting a ballot initiative in Washington state that would require labeling of foods containing genetically modified crops at the Central Co-op in Seattle, Washington October 29, 2013.  (Reuters/Jason Redmond)

An employee stocks produce near a sign supporting a ballot initiative in Washington state that would require labeling of foods containing genetically modified crops at the Central Co-op in Seattle, Washington October 29, 2013. (Reuters/Jason Redmond)

The citizens of Washington State have voted against a bill that would have required the labeling of genetically altered foods, according to preliminary ballot results.

Tuesday’s ballots saw 35 counties out of 39 vote against the legislation backed by environmentalists. Counties Whatcom, King, Jefferson and San Juan were the only ones to vote for the labeling of GMO products. 

The current figures are based on preliminary results, with confirmation expected by Friday. Washingtonians vote by absentee ballot which means the authorities will accept any ballot marked with November 5.

Supporters of the bill were severely outgunned in the campaign faced by corporate opposition from the likes of Monsanto, Pepsi and Nestle.

The multinationals invested a total of $22 million in convincing the state’s constituents they should vote against the mandatory labeling of foods with genetically modified ingredients.
 
The legislation’s advocates could do little to compete with the multinationals, raising only $8.4 million. They believed that if the legislation were approved in Washington, then other States in the US would follow suit. Currently around 70 percent of processed foods in America are made using genetically modified ingredients like sugar beets, soy, and corn.

Connecticut made history this June by becoming the first state to require the labeling of foods that had been genetically altered. 

The bill, also known as Initiative 522 (I522), would have obliged companies that produce genetically modified food to label their products as such. The legislation was to come into effect in 2015.

A survey carried out in early September by Politico indicated early support for the bill with 66 percent of Washingtonians approving of the legislation. However, by October support had declined significantly, to 46 percent, after the bill’s corporate opposition poured millions into a media campaign.

This is not the first time tech giants have rallied against legislation that would have forced them to label their genetically altered produce. In 2012 a similar bill was struck down in California after a $45 million campaign by Monsanto and its cohorts.

Proposition 37 was aimed to “enforce the fundamental right of the people of California to be fully informed about whether the food they purchase and eat is genetically engineered and not misbranded as natural.”

Image from vote.wa.gov

Comments (142)

 

cilantro 27.11.2013 06:59

while we work on getting the labels, etc., we DO still have the freedom to choose only organic and non gmo verified..
so many do not seem to understand genetic modification though, and it would be a great help to look at wesites that explain it well, such as gmwatch.
also, all that advertising paid for by corporations to convince people to vote no only managed to win for them by a very small margin. last i checked, the votes were:
yes:48.92 ,no:51.08 there were still a few more votes to count, but not quite enough to win this time.
just buy organic and non-gmo verified.

 

R 27.11.2013 04:23

Thats right, keep watching tv and believing MSM, soon there will be no freedom left!
and your fiat dollar will be worth less than a penny!

 

R 27.11.2013 04:21

If it isn't required to state GMO or not, then why should it have an ingredients label at all!
Once again freedom of choice or just plain freedom taken away again, soon there will be none left!

View all comments (142)
Add comment

Authorization required for adding comments

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

OK

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

X

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us

Follow us