Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.


White House denies visa to Iran's pick for UN ambassador

Published time: April 11, 2014 17:04
Edited time: April 11, 2014 18:00
Hamid Aboutalebi (Photo from Twitter/@NegarMortazavi)

Hamid Aboutalebi (Photo from Twitter/@NegarMortazavi)

The Iranian diplomat picked to be the Islamic republic’s ambassador to the United Nations will not be allowed to enter the United States where the UN is headquartered, Reuters has reported.

White House press secretary Jay Carney confirmed to the newswire on Friday afternoon that Hamid Aboutalebi — Iran’s recent pick as envoy to the UN — will not be granted an American visa, effectively barring him from beginning his ambassadorship.

The latest decision out of Washington comes in the midst of urging from Congress to keep Aboutalebi, a former member of the Muslim Students Following the Imam's Line, from becoming an ambassador to the UN. In 1979, that group occupied the US Embassy in Tehran and held dozens of American citizens hostage for over a year, though Aboutalebi has since insisted that his role within the organization was limited to “translation and negotiation.”

Current members of the US Congress disagree, however, and the US Senate voted overwhelmingly on Monday this week to bar Aboutalebi from entry to America over what that measure’s author, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), called a “deliberate and unambiguous insult to the United States.”

But since visa bans are issued from the executive branch, the effort on Capitol Hill was considered to be merely symbolic. With pressure mounting, though, Carney has now confirmed days later that the White House has in fact issued restrictions against the would-be ambassador.

"We concur with the Congress and share the intent of the bill," Carney said, according to Reuters.

White House press secretary Jay Carney (Reuters/Kevin Lamarque)

Previously, the UN said "It has been a usual practice in the Iranian Foreign Ministry to formally appoint ambassadors for all foreign postings, once all formalities pertaining to this process are completed." The organization did not immediately respond to Reuters' request for comment.

Earlier in the week, officials in Iran said they were opposed to Congress’ efforts to keep Aboutalebi from becoming UN ambassador, and the spokesperson for the foreign ministry said that “until we receive a formal response from official channels, we do not consider the matter finished.” Aboutalebi, 56, has previously served as Iran’s ambassador to three countries and the European Union.

"The US Senate action to bar Aboutalebi's entry as Iran's designated ambassador at the UN is sheer interference in the internal affairs of the UN," Mohammad Hassan Asafari — a member of the Iranian Parliament's National Security and Foreign Policy Commission — said earlier in the week.“The Americans are not entitled to the right to oppose the entry of the Islamic Republic of Iran's representative at the UN and the US Senate approval is illegal."

Friday’s decision also comes months after the presidents of the US and Iran had their first formal discussion in 30 years, which American President Barack Obama said after was a“major step forward in a new relationship between the United States and the Islamic Republican of Iran.” According to Obama, Iran’s Pres. Hassan Rouhani “indicated that Iran will never develop nuclear weapons” during the call.

Comments (76)


fran7 14.04.2014 07:25

This is a disgusting show of childishness by the USA government and Iran is quite correct in its right to choose its own diplomats. USA continually back anarchy in the World and deny ordinary folk their basic human rights. USA government are guilty of media control and gross distortions of the truth. Ron Paul is right.


Douglas Dewar 14.04.2014 04:34

The UN came into being because the American Republic had a vision of a civilized world. It is a great pity that the American Empire has no such vision.


Peter Jennings 13.04.2014 14:41

It's time to move the UN out of america and into a country which honours their promises and agreements. Into a country that isn't on the make and one that isn't run by paranoid freaks intent on spying on everyone and ruling the world.

Who are the US admin to deny anyone to speak at the UN? Is the UN just a play thing for the US admin? Is the UN just a political tool only for the US admin to wield whenever they feel theatened in their paranoia or when a US business deal can't go ahead?

Move the UN now before it falls deeper into farce and calamity.

View all comments (76)
Add comment

Authorization required for adding comments

Register or



Show password


or Register

Request a new password


or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:


or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile



New password

Retype new password

Current password



Follow us

Follow us