Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.


Can’t catch a break? Chemicals again spill into W. Virginia water

Published time: February 12, 2014 01:05
Edited time: February 13, 2014 11:03
Freedom Industries on Barlow St on the banks of the Elk River is seen on January 10, 2014 in Charleston, West Virginia (AFP Photo /  Tom Hindman)

Freedom Industries on Barlow St on the banks of the Elk River is seen on January 10, 2014 in Charleston, West Virginia (AFP Photo / Tom Hindman)

A coal preparation facility breached Tuesday, sending over 100,000 gallons of coal liquid waste leaked from a West Virginia coal preparation facility and into the nearby water supply, officials have announced.

The West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) opened an investigation into a coal slurry spill Tuesday morning. The slurry is made up solid and liquid waste that is created as a by-product of the coal mining process. While officials are unsure exactly how much of the waste leaked into a tributary of West Virginia’s Kanawha River, although one source told the West Virginia Gazette there is already “a significant environmental impact.”

West Virginia American Water, the company responsible for the Kanawha Valley Water Treatment Plant, issued a statement Tuesday saying that the leak is not expected to impact the public water supply.

If that proves true, it will be a relief to West Virginia residents who only weeks ago endured a massive chemical spill that spilled crude 4-methylcyclohexanemethanol (MCHM) from a Freedom Industries plant into the Elk River, another tributary of the Kanawha River. The spill occurred on January 9 near the primary West Virginia American Water intake plant and left 300,000 citizens across nine counties without water for weeks.

Our employees are working on behalf of our customers with local and state officials to gather additional information,” West Virginia American Water spokeswoman Laura Jordan said in a statement. “We have been in contact with the West Virginia Bureau for Public Health, which concurs that they do not anticipate any impact to our plant on the Elk River.”

The coal slurry began seeping out of the plant at approximately midnight Monday night and continued doing so until 5:30 am the next morning. It is thought to contain crude MCHM, the same coal-cleaning chemical that leaked into the water supply after the Freedom Industries plant. Emergency responders told local media outlets that the company only reported the spill after 7:00 am.

On February 3, after the Elk River leak, a massive pipe under a coal ash pond exploded, sending another 82,000 tons of ash and 27 million gallons of water into the Dan River, not far from the Elk River. Erin Savage, water quality specialist, M.E.Sc. from Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, told Eco Watch, that the time for outrage has arrived.

A spill of a chemical used by the coal industry, a coal ash spill and now a coal slurry spill – the common denominator here is the glaring lack of enforcement of the coal industry which has enjoyed political cover for far too long,” she said.

Officials were scrambling Tuesday to slow the spill before it made its way through the tributary and into the main river. The DEP is also examining water samples at the Patriot Coal processing plant, according to the Gazette. The US Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement issued a report in 2009 declaring that “while the state is following its approved program the existing policies and procedures are not effective in reducing or preventing blackwater spills.”

Matt Wasson, director of programs, Ph.D. in ecology from Cornell University said that such reports are evidence the problem could get worse before it gets better.

The coal industry prefers to talk about a supposed ‘war on coal,’ but there spills remind Americans why we have environmental rules and why we need much stronger enforcement to keep our water safe,” he said.

Comments (20)


Enlightened 13.02.2014 17:41

What they need is to reroute the flow upstream and away from the plant. Then work on the damage. Wtf is going on here? It seems there is so much coalash they can't even store it all. A leak is the most inexpensive way to get rid of it. Ever see an 18-wheeler with liquid trailer that has a leak? Yep, inexpensive disposal of hazardous materials. Happens a lot now.


Rachel Rotz 13.02.2014 17:38

It's likely this coal plant uses the river water for part of the extraction process. Since our groundwater system is interrelated with surface waters (rivers); it's not difficult to contaminate the groundwater if discharge compositions are unsafe. Governmental agencies set limits to what can be dumped back into the river and routinely monitor the plants to make sure they comply with the law. Other than that, they are not equipped to handle big accidents that stem from negligence. This has nothing to do with Obama or a red state vs. a blue state. This is dirty energy. Accidents happen.


Mark Veritas 13.02.2014 16:56

Why do they keep allowing these chemical plants right next to water consumed by citizens?

View all comments (20)
Add comment

Authorization required for adding comments

Register or



Show password


or Register

Request a new password


or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:


or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile



New password

Retype new password

Current password



Follow us

Follow us