Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.

 

Republican Congressman Amash calls Snowden whistleblower, not traitor

Published time: August 05, 2013 15:59
Edited time: August 06, 2013 09:35
U.S. Rep. Justin Amash (Mark Wilson / Getty Images / AFP)

U.S. Rep. Justin Amash (Mark Wilson / Getty Images / AFP)

Rep. Justin Amash (R-Mich.) on Sunday called former NSA contractor Edward Snowden a whistleblower, not a traitor, and said that members of Congress would have been left in the dark about the NSA’s spy tactics if it weren’t for the information leaks.

Speaking on “Fox NewsSunday”, the Michigan Republican, who is a prominent critic of the National Security Agency, applauded Snowden for publicizing classified information that lawmakers would have otherwise never known about.

“Without his doing what he did, members of Congress would not have really known about [those programs],” Amash said. “Members of Congress were not really aware on the whole about what these programs were being used for and the extent to which they were being used. Members of the intelligence committee were told, but rank-and-file members really didn’t have the information.”

When asked by Fox’s Chris Wallace if Amash would go so far as to call Snowden a whistleblower, the lawmaker said he would, arguing that the former NSA contractor provided Congress with important information that should have already been known. Amash thereby joined the 55 percent of Americans who consider Snowden a whistleblower, rather than the 34 percent who call him a traitor.

“Yes,” Amash said. “As I said, he may be doing things overseas that we’d find problematic, that we’d find dangerous… we’ll find those facts out over time. But as far as Congress is concerned, sure, he’s a whistleblower. He told us what we need to know.” 

Amash has been a vocal opponent of NSA surveillance, and last month introduced a bipartisan amendment to the Defense appropriations bill that would defund the NSA’s data-collection of phone records. The vote failed in the House by a narrow margin, but Amash has continued to stand up against the NSA.

During Sunday’s interview, Amash also expanded on his thoughts about the controversial program.

“It’s important to understand that what the Justice Department and intelligence community are relying on is a third party doctrine,” he said. “They are saying that because you’ve given your data, because it’s shared with a third party, it becomes public property.”

Other congressional lawmakers have taken a more hostile stance toward the former NSA contractor. House Speaker John Boehner called Snowden a “traitor”, and Sen. Bill Nelson (D-Fla.) accused him of committing an act of treason. Sen. Angus King (I-Maine) called him dangerous, and Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) has condemned Snowden’s actions and urged him to “come back and face the music.”

With Snowden out of reach of US authorities, lawmakers continue to express frustration with both his inaccessibility and the NSA’s spy tactics – and Amash believes the whistleblower did an honorable thing by revealing them. 


Comments (24)

 

Ryan Roland 06.08.2013 16:17

skeptic 05.08.2013 22:33

The headline I want to read one day in this country: American voters turn out in record numbers this election day to effectively tell the heads of state, "Your fired!"

  



Problem is that by the time election day comes, you're already too late. It has to start back in the primaries (which most people don't know or care about) or you will be stuck with Evil politician A or Slightly Less Evil politician B. The only other option is to implement something like Approval Voting.

 

Ryan Roland 06.08.2013 16:13

Orbiter 06.08.2013 12:02


Speaking about electronic voting, how do you verify it is not rigged? Just asking.

  


Paper trail. After you cast your ballot, you get a printout of whom you chose for every office. You confirm it's accurate and then you slide it into a locked box. Those printouts will be stored for a year and be available for any member of the public to inspect.

Th e electronic count is used for expediency, but in the event of a recount or some controversy or whatever unusual numbers, the paper ballots are there and present for someone to look into and confirm the results.

 

Helical 06.08.2013 15:39

One congressman has got it right !

View all comments (24)
Add comment

Authorization required for adding comments

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

OK

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

X

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us

Follow us