Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.

 

Nothing personal? Obama says no nation avoids US spying

Published time: February 12, 2014 02:42
U.S. President Barack Obama and first lady Michelle Obama welcome French President Francois Hollande to the White House for a State Dinner in Washington February 11, 2014 (Reuters / Kevin Lamarque)

U.S. President Barack Obama and first lady Michelle Obama welcome French President Francois Hollande to the White House for a State Dinner in Washington February 11, 2014 (Reuters / Kevin Lamarque)

Ally or not, the US does not have an agreement with any country that would prevent espionage in light of national security concerns, President Obama said on Tuesday, prior to an official state dinner with a European head of state.

During a joint press conference with French President Francois Hollande, Obama was asked whether his selection of France for the first state visit of his second term as president signalled a post-spying agreement with America’s European ally. Through documents supplied by former National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden, it was revealed that the NSA spied on French citizens and the internal communications of France's foreign ministry and diplomats.

“There’s no country where we have a no-spy agreement,” Obama answered.

The US has long worked on global surveillance operations in conjunction with the other members of the so-called Five Eyes contingency: Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom. Yet even the Five Eyes countries have not committed to avoid spying on one another.

Obama went on to highlight the changes he has ordered US agencies to make regarding direct surveillance of foreign leaders.

In announcing those changes in January, Obama said that the US is the “world’s only superpower” and must continue to conduct operations allies are not able to accomplish on their own.

“We will not apologize simply because our services may be more effective,” he said, “but heads of state and governments with whom we work closely . . . should feel confident that we are treating them as real partners.”

The US government “will continue to gather information about the intentions” of foreign governments, Obama said. Yet he also promised the NSA “will not monitor the communications of heads of state” atop the ranks of allied partners unless there are compelling national security purposes at stake.

Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act would be subject to reform as well, Obama announced, allowing the US to intercept the communications of overseas targets with important information without putting as many Americans and foreign persons incidentally targeted under the looking glass.

Speaking after Obama on Tuesday, Hollande said the two nations had put the controversy behind them, though he said foreign citizens’ privacy must be respected on some level.

"Mutual trust must be based on respect for each other's country, but also based on the protection of private life, of personal data," Hollande said.

There has been no indication to date that Hollande was the target of any NSA spying.

“Following the revelations that appeared due to Snowden, we clarified things, Mr. Obama and myself, we clarified things. And then this was in the past,” Hollande added. “Mutual trust has been restored.”

Hollande’s restored faith in the Franco-American alliance comes just in time for Tuesday night’s state dinner at the White House. Included on the guest list for Tuesday’s banquet honoring Hollande is NSA Director Keith Alexander.

Comments (60)

 

Sean 02.05.2014 20:22

Worlds only superpower,yeah right... Arrogant and full of hot air...

 

Marta Krawczyk 15.02.2014 09:22

Joe Cabot 13.02.2014 15:32

Not even a no-spy policy on its own citizens, and Barry says it with a smile. One goof after another infesting the White House, along with hoards of them in congress. And Americans go along willingly, reelecting most of them as if there is no evidence of the damage that they are doing.

  


But WHY? WHY do we go quietly & willingly? Don't we know, that eventually, it will be us, who will have to pay the highest price for the damage that they've done? Are we that d.umb, god d@mn it? :=)

 

Marta Krawczyk 15.02.2014 09:02

EP members lick Obama's ebony @ss, and say it's vanilla icecream- only their noses mysteriously get chocolaty brown... how much lower can they possibly get? And WHY? WHY do they act like if Europe was actually not separate, sovereign, independent continent, but rather US colony??! Can somebody explain me, please?! Cuz I just can't get it!

View all comments (60)
Add comment

Authorization required for adding comments

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

OK

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

X

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us

Follow us