Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.

 

White House considers halt to surveillance of allied leaders

Published time: October 28, 2013 17:37
Edited time: October 29, 2013 13:54
Jay Carney, the White House press secretary (AFP Photo / Brendan Smialowski)

Jay Carney, the White House press secretary (AFP Photo / Brendan Smialowski)

The White House is currently evaluating whether to end surveillance programs allegedly targeting the leaderships of allied nations such as Germany.

This follows criticism from Senator Dianne Feinstein, the Senate Intelligence Committee's chairwoman, who said that she was "totally opposed" to the collection of intelligence on US allies, and said that such surveillance of foreign heads of state would cease immediately.

“The White House has informed me that collection on our allies will not continue, which I support -- but as far as I’m concerned, Congress needs to know exactly what our intelligence community is doing. To that end, the committee will initiate a major review into all intelligence collection programs,” she said in a statement on Monday.

"Unless the United States is engaged in hostilities against a country or there is an emergency need for this type of surveillance, I do not believe the United States should be collecting phone calls or emails of friendly presidents and prime ministers."

The White House said Monday evening that it was conducting an internal review on its surveillance programs, which include the monitoring of allied foreign leaders, to be completed by December. 

“We have already made some decisions through this process and expect to make more,” said Caitlin M. Hayden, spokeswoman for the National Security Council.

The Obama administration earlier said the controversial intelligence gathering procedures that have attracted international scrutiny in recent months may require “additional constraints.”

Jay Carney, the White House press secretary, made the remark during a scheduled Monday afternoon briefing on the heels of the latest revelations made possible through the unauthorized disclosure of sensitive National Security Agency documents detailing US-led programs that spied on foreign citizens and politicians.

There are a number of efforts underway that are designed to increase transparency, to work with Congress to look at reform to the Patriot Act [and] to look at ways we can increase oversight and increase constraint on the authorities provided by these programs,” Carney told reporters.

The press secretary also echoed words made earlier that day by National Security Adviser Susan Rice, who tweeted of a balance needing to be reached with regards to how intelligence gathering.

Carney said that the spy-programs made public through leaked NSA documents attributed by former intelligence contractor Edward Snowden are legal through the post-9/11 Patriot Act, but that “steps could be taken to put in place greater oversight--greater transparency--as well as constraints on the use of this authority.”

Additionally, Carney said US President Barack Obama has ordered his administration to conduct a review of those programs.

The issues that are part of the review look at how we can better balance our security needs and the security needs of our allies against the real privacy concerns that we all share,” Carney said.

Despite White House official’s assertions that they were unaware of the NSA’s eavesdropping activities in Europe, former NSA workers told the LA Times the White House and the State Department signed off on surveillance targeting phones.

Moreover, the officials told the newspaper that the spy scandal has opened rifts between US intelligence and the government, as Obama seeks to distance himself from the allegations.

The latest revelations of surveillance involving German chancellor Angela Merkel prompted European officials to threaten to stop sharing data on the SWIFT banking system, which provided alerts on potential transfer of funds by terrorists.

Comments (62)

 

Karel Cleuren 29.10.2013 17:49

@ Logical American

So youre one of those that agrees with, if you got nothing to hide then you got nothing to fear.

So then why does your government hides everything from you then. I guess they do got a whole lot to fear? Except for outrage of the outside world.

 

Noah Way 29.10.2013 14:23

The check is I'm the mail, and I promise I won't come in your mouth. Trust me.

 

pmt1103 29.10.2013 13:13

Lilly OfTheValley 29.10.2013 13:00



Ob ama said "he didn't know". So he is either incompetent or a liar. Pick your choice.

  


Ha trick question it's both choices.

View all comments (62)
Add comment

Authorization required for adding comments

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

OK

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

X

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us