Rand Paul's plan for the Pentagon: Stop spending millions on goldfish

Published time: February 22, 2013 15:52
Edited time: February 23, 2013 08:34
Rand Paul (AFP Photo / Saul Loeb)

Sen. Rand Paul (R-Kentucky) has some ideas to help dig America out of debt, and for starters he thinks we should do away with all of our dang goldfish research.

Wait. Goldfish research?

If all goes as planned, the $1.2 trillion in spending cuts known as sequestration will start on March 1, and members of Congress are still trying to come up with an alternate solution to alleviate the United States of its monetary woes. Sen. Paul, a long-time proponent of cutting back on government spending, spoke to Fox News this week about how he would fix the fiasco.

“In the military they have $5.2 million they spent on goldfish — studying goldfish to see how democratic they were and if we could learn about democracy from goldfish. I would give the president the authority to go ahead and cut all $5 million in goldfish studies,” Sen. Paul said during a Thursday broadcast.

Later, the lawmaker blamed US President Barack Obama for the current state of affairs, saying, “The sequester was his idea.”

“He signed it into law and he needs to take responsibility,” the senator said, “and he needs to act responsibly and we’ve given him a list of cuts he could do without laying off anybody.”

At the top of the list is axing programs like one documented in a defense spending report released back in November by Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Oklahoma). In it, the lawmaker’s office lays out a plan for saving the Pentagon $67.9 billion over ten years’ time by focusing on “non-defense” cuts. Included in that battleplan is pulling the plug on a recent $5.2 million fish study.

“Fish could show the nation how to overcome political polarization and promote democracy, according to Pentagon-funded research,” Coburn’s team wrote. “The Pentagon claims the research provides ‘a better understanding of how individuals with low stake impact achieve a democratic consensus’ and this ‘effort supports Military Information Support Operations (MISO) mission area.’” In learning as much, though, the Defense Department blew through a $5.2 million grant from DARPA.

Earlier this month, Sen. Paul told RawStory that Congress is often described as lacking bipartisanship. “That is not true. In fact, there is plenty. Both parties have been guilty of spending too much, of protecting their sacred cows, of back room deals in which everyone up here wins, but every taxpayer loses.” Hopefully now he has found some other common ground between Democrats and Republicans: ending fish research.


Comments (4)

Michael Powe 26.02.2013 18:08

Brain-numbing irony that a web site proclaiming, "Question more," would, in fact -- ask no questions. Act as a press release stenographer.

First Coburn and then Rand cited the nonexistent "goldfish study." Coburn made it up out of whole cloth; Rand parrotted him. RT parrotted both.

Read. Think. Write.

0

Undo

Anonymous user 25.02.2013 20:17

There is no such program. Sens. Paul and Coburn are full of it. Do a little research, people!

0

Undo

Dink Shwinker 23.02.2013 01:43

I wish Senator Paul had more clout. He's right. "Bipartisan simply means that I'll vote for your pork project if you vote for my pork project.

0

Undo

View all comments (4)
Add comment

By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our Posting rules

Log in to comment in full, or comment anonymously under character-limit restriction.

100 Text

– required fields

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us