Mad Max, Beyond the DunderDome, lol.
I would like to see Mr. Keiser take on the Big dude, then all the little munchkins running the banks come crying about the big guy being a usefull idiot(like the dollar bill). Well you'd just have to see the movie I guess. Max Keiser is hilarious.
Thanks Mr. Keiser. AND  MS. HERBERT.

Addendum:

Als o consider the incredible pressure from the public to indict banking criminals like Dick Fuld, Jon Corzine and Jamie Diamond.  There are so many letters and emails to senators, house members and the president, that each have to be realizing a large political cost for not bringing these criminals to justice.  With all that extreme public pressure, how is it possible these criminals go un-indicted?  I have personally asked for these specific indictments from my two house members, my two senators (Boxer, Feinstein) and Obama.  All five normally return mail regarding most any subject under the sun.  The ONLY reply I received was from Barbara Boxer and Boxer evaded the question.

So, I have to ask...  Who on earth sways that power?

PICK UP THE PIECES

What we know:
1)  The original JP Morgan (the man) actually owned very little of his vast wealth.  He was, in fact, little more than a financial agent for the Rothschilds.
2)  There is no reason not to believe that the Rothschilds still own the majority of JP Morgan Bank.
3)  You cannot pilfer a bank that owes billions to the government by declaring a dividend.  That is, you must clear your debt before realizing any profits.
4)  Major bank CEO's will commit felonies, stay out of prison, lose multi-billion$ and still retain their jobs only under the following conditions:
a)  They are commiting felonies because they are ordered to commit them by the bank owner.
b)  The bank owner guarantees the CEO will never be indicted and have the power to follow through on that guarantee.
c)  The CEO's are making sure they ONLY "lose" money to the bank owners (Rothschild or Rothschild agents).  In fact, bank losses are, in reality, theft.  It's the only method of pulling vast amounts of money from a bank that is technically bankrupt.
5)  There is more than one way to rob your own bank and the Rothschilds know them all.
6)  LIBOR rigging translates into huge amounts of thieved cash for the banks.  Monsterous and mysterious "bank losses", which no honest professional banker would ever allow, are silly derivative wagers made with Rothschild agents to draw off these LIBOR thieved profits.

Conc lusion:
It now all makes perfect sense.  It is the ONLY scenario that makes sense.  The Rothschilds protect Jamie Diamond, et al, while the banks rob markets FOR THE ROTHSCHILDS.   "Stupid" derivative mistakes are the methods the Rothschilds use to ciphon off the thieved cash.  What could be more obvious yet simple?