Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.

 

US rights groups condemn NSA spying, religious slurs against Muslim-Americans

Published time: July 10, 2014 13:56
Muslims hold Friday prayers in Foley Square in New York City (AFP Photo /  Mario Tama)

Muslims hold Friday prayers in Foley Square in New York City (AFP Photo / Mario Tama)

Following reports on the FBI and NSA’s targeting of Muslim-Americans, an alliance of 44 civil rights groups has sent a letter to President Obama, while the NSA faces criticism over racial slurs.

The latest batch of NSA documents, detailed in an article by journalist Glenn Greenwald and published by the Intercept this week, have triggered shock waves through the civil rights community.

FBI, NSA targets Muslim-American lawyers, rights activists

Not only does the NSA seem to unfairly target Muslims over their religious beliefs, but the agency peppered the report with racial slurs, at one point calling a hypothetical target in an instructional manual from 2005 “Mohammed Raghead.”

The letter from the 44 civil rights groups, organized by the American Civil Liberties Union, drew parallels between the NSA’s intense interest in Muslims and the political firestorm that prevailed during an earlier politically turbulent period of American history:

“[D]uring the 1960s and 1970s, civil rights leaders, activists and members of minority communities were subjected to unlawful and abusive government surveillance based not on what they had done, but what they believed and who they were,” the letter read. “Despite reform efforts, abusive practices continue today. Federal, state, and local law enforcement are targeting entire communities—particularly American Muslims—for secret surveillance based on their race, religion, ethnicity or national origin.”

According to the leaked material, at least 202 Muslim-Americans have fallen under the surveillance of their government, including Nihad Awad, the executive director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), the largest Muslim civil rights organization in the country, and Faisal Gill, member of the Republican Party and a former political candidate who held served in the Department of Homeland Security under President George W. Bush.

None of the targeted Muslim-Americans has been charged with a crime.

While the White House has not yet responded to the coalition’s letter, spokeswoman Caitlin Hayden told the Guardian that the Obama administration takes the issue of racial slurs “extremely seriously.”

"Upon learning of this matter, the White House immediately requested that the director of national intelligence undertake an assessment of intelligence community policies, training standards or directives that promote diversity and tolerance, and as necessary, make any recommendations changes or additional reforms," Hayden said.

Sen. Ron Wyden, a fierce critic of NSA activities, said the latest revelation “raises new questions about agencies’ internal oversight of domestic surveillance activities and the adequacy of protections for the privacy of law-abiding Americans.”

Vanee Vines, a spokeswoman for the NSA, said "Any use of racial or ethnic stereotypes, slurs, or other similar language by employees is both unacceptable and inconsistent with NSA policy and core values."

In 2011, the FBI, at the behest of the White House, was forced to remove a large quantity of offensive language from its training material, including some that called for "Hiroshima" tactics against Islamic countries.

AFP Photo / Ziyah Gafic

The NSA, the Justice Department and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence rejected the assertion that intelligence work was based on specific belief systems.

"It is entirely false that US intelligence agencies conduct electronic surveillance of political, religious or activist figures solely because they disagree with public policies or criticize the government, or for exercising constitutional rights," the Office of the Director of National Intelligence and the Justice Department said in a joint statement.

"No US person can be the subject of surveillance based solely on First Amendment activities, such as staging public rallies, organizing campaigns, writing critical essays, or expressing personal beliefs. On the other hand, a person who the court finds is an agent of a foreign power under this rigorous standard is not exempted just because of his or her occupation," the statement said.

It is worth noting that another 5,501 email addresses tagged for surveillance, the “nationality” column was marked “unknown” or left blank, while the remaining 1,782 accounts were tagged as belonging to “non-US persons.” Without this piece of information, it is impossible to say with certainty that Muslim-American were more likely to fall under surveillance than other racial and religious groups.

Comments (8)

 

Chris Riley 11.07.2014 14:15

pork should be USA number one meat. We need more beacon

 

Khalilah Sabra 10.07.2014 23:06

Once and Again







This type of unwarranted government surveillance should not only be troubling to American Muslim communities but all Americans who support civil rights and liberties. The tactics implored by the NSA clearly runs counter to the core principles of freedom of speech, religion and association which underpin the very fabric of our nation. In the end, these tactics worked to undermine legitimate aspirations of American Muslims who seek freedom, growth and participation in governance.


Khalilah Sabra
Executive Director
Muslim American Society Immigrant Justice Center

 

Rick 10.07.2014 16:01

StreetSleeper 10.07.2014 15:33

yep A - yer Free to speak terds. Enjoy that. This was great!:"It is entirely false that US intelligence agencies conduct electronic surveillance of political, religious or activist figures for exercising constitutional rights," - z - just cause they say so, huh?
Only Senile 60 year old's would listen to ANYTHING they say- through that Swiss cheeze between their ears.

  


Agreed. But in the days they were raised, the government was a bit more trustworthy. They still expect it to be as such.

View all comments (8)
Add comment

Authorization required for adding comments

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

OK

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

X

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us

Follow us