Keep up with the news by installing RT’s extension for . Never miss a story with this clean and simple app that delivers the latest headlines to you.


Top US military commander: 'I don't want to be complicit' if Israel attacks Iran

Published time: August 31, 2012 16:07
Edited time: August 31, 2012 20:07
US Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Martin Dempsey (AFP Photo / Karen Bleier)

US Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Martin Dempsey (AFP Photo / Karen Bleier)

The highest ranking officer in the United States military has announced that he is against American participation in any Israeli-led attack on Iran, even as pressure to destroy the Islamic Republic’s rumored nuclear program remain unrelieved.

Gen. Martin Dempsey, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told reporters in London on Thursday that an Israeli attack would “clearly delay but probably not destroy Iran’s nuclear program,” adding that he was against US cooperation in a unilateral assault.

“I don't want to be complicit if they [Israel] choose to do it,” Dempsey told reporters.

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has been adamant that the nation’s nuclear facilities exist solely for peaceful purposes and that the country is not in the market for procuring nuclear warheads, a sentiment echoed by Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who earlier this week told heads of state, "Our motto is nuclear energy for all and nuclear weapons for none."

So far, no foreign nations have been able to independently confirm or deny that claim. On Thursday, however, the United Nation’s International Atomic Energy Agency wrote that Iran has been uncooperative with attempts to investigate their facilities and suggested that they could be procuring nukes.

Israel, a close ally of the United States, has also claimed that Iran’s intentions are motivated by manufacturing of warheads. In May of this year, Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak stated, “Our position has not changed. The world must stop Iran from becoming nuclear. All options remain on the table."

From an executive standpoint, President Obama has also remained willing to strike if necessary, but has not pushed for pressure on Iran aside from the sanctions currently imposed by the United States.

"I also don't, as a matter of sound policy, go around advertising exactly what our intentions are. But (both) governments recognize that when the United States says it is unacceptable for Iran to have a nuclear weapon, we mean what we say,” President Obama said earlier this year to The Atlantic.

On Thursday, Gen. Dempsey commented that a strike against Iran over fears of their nuclear program, if conducted, could be without merit and might even erode the pro-Israeli alliance currently in place.

"International coalition" applying pressure on Iran "could be undone if [Iran] was attacked prematurely,” Dempsey said, adding that “Intelligence did not reveal intentions” to procure nukes.

Gen. Dempsey was in the UK to attend the Paralympic Games, where he is serving as the head of the U.S. delegation.

Comments (3)


buck1827 22.05.2014 23:50

I agree with Dempsey. There is no reason for Israel to attack Iran. Iran's new president is attempting diplomacy, and in general Iran has been much more cooperative with the west. The US must show Iran we wish to continue this confidence building by acknowledging our desire to avoid military conflict on Israel's behalf.


John Brian Shannon 22.05.2014 22:32

JCS General, Martin Dempsey, is absolutely right.

By 2024, there will be 2.1 billion Muslims on this Earth, and really, how many of them do we want angry at the West?

Bombi ng yet another Muslim country under (again) dubious WMD claims, might be enough to get all of them angry at us!

Is that in our best interest? Obviously NOT.

So far there is no proof that Iran has a bomb, or is looking to obtain a bomb.

Until then, we have no case against Iran.

And, many countries have nuclear bombs and we don't attack them!

As famous British statesman Tony Benn said; "All war represents [is] the failure of diplomacy."


Irfan Alam 08.04.2013 08:07

This dumb-wit - won't have to!, the Iranians will be more than willing to whip his behind with their anti-ship cruise missiles.

Add comment

Authorization required for adding comments

Register or



Show password


or Register

Request a new password


or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:


or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile



New password

Retype new password

Current password



Follow us

Follow us