Breaking news

At least 5 wounded as two explosions hit Lebanon's capital - reports

To bomb or not to bomb? Obama and Netanyahu meeting will be all about Iran

Published time: March 01, 2012 16:54
Edited time: March 01, 2012 20:54
U.S. President Barack Obama and Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. (Reuters / Jim Young)

US President Obama will meet with both the America-Israel Political Action Committee and Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu this week; with Jerusalem and Washington at odds over Iran, however, that issue is likely be the only one up for discussion.

There will be a heavy Israeli presence in Washington this week with US President Barack Obama scheduling conferences with both AIPAC leaders and Israel PM Netanyahu. Those engagements for Obama will bookend the annual AIPAC conference in the US capital, but this year’s meetings could not have come at more unusual time as tensions between the two nations are at their worst in decades.

Notwithstanding a strong and consistently controversial alliance, both the US and Israel are currently disputing the issue of Iran and how a rumored nuclear program there could put a weapon of mass destruction in the hands of Tehran. Despite urging from Israel to preemptively act on Iran before they can procure a nuclear warhead for themselves, the US has remained hesitant to use force on Tehran. For now, Obama has relied on words, warnings and sanctions to scare Iran away from any program that could put a nuke overseas. Israel, however, has repeatedly asked America to act on Iran before events escalate any further. As the zero hour approaches over a rumored Iranian nuke, this weekend’s talks are expected to almost exclusively serve as a preemptive war room roundtable.

Senior Israeli officials speaking to that country’s Haaretz news outlet say that the March 5 meeting between Obama and Netanyahu will involve one-on-one talks to try and ensure that America acts against Iran. According to the official speaking on condition of anonymity, Israel wants America to be well aware that they will act themselves on Iran if research on the rumored nuclear program calls for it. As a result, Israel hopes that America will finally perceive the threat as a dangerous one to their allies and themselves and respond accordingly.

To Haaretz, other sources say they suspect that Netanyahu is heavily relying on Congress and Republican candidates for the presidency to pressure Obama towards a strike. Former House speaker and GOP presidential hopeful Newt Gingrich will also be in attendance at this week’s AIPAC event and is expected to attack Obama over his reluctance to side against Iran already with force. Speaking earlier this month to CNN about how he would aid a threat against Israel, Gingrich said, "I would say, if you believe the survival of your country is at stake, what is it we could do to help you?”

"People should not kid themselves. The Israelis are not going to take the risk of a second holocaust. And that is exactly what (Iranian President Mahmoud) Ahmadinejad with a nuclear weapon represents," added Gingrich. The speaker has also insisted during earlier engagement that the joint missile drill between the US and Israel was postponed earlier this year as a result or urging from Obama, “so as not to be provocative.” Israeli intelligence, on the other hand, has suggested that it was Netanyahu who postponed the drill as a warning to Iran that they would be ready to strike with or without American assistance.

That missile exercise, the Austere Challenge 12 drill, was originally scheduled for this April but has been since postponed until later in 2012. When it does go underway, thousands of US troops and the country’s most remarkable missiles will be deployed to Israel.

In Washington, other Republican leaders have come to the aide of Israel despite hesitancy from the Obama administration. Former presidential candidate, Senator John McCain, recently remarked that it was unfortunate that the US and Israel were not seeing eye-to-eye over Iran, adding, “We would like to see the United States and Israel agree on course of action that will lead us toward a goal we both share.” Those remarks were offered as a response to reports from Jerusalem that PM Netanyahu referred to US Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman General Martin Dempsey as a servant of Iran last month.

With the president polling poorly among voters when poised against his GOP rivals, it is likely that added heat by way of Republican-reared rhetoric will only influence Obama to align himself more fully with Israel after this week’s meetings. The AIPAC conference in Washington, DC formally goes underway March 4 and will host speeches from Obama and Netanyahu, as well as Israeli President Shimon Peres, US Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and several congressional leaders from both sides of the aisle.

Comments (43)

Green Lantern (unregistered) 07.02.2013 17:04

Step back a bit farther and see the over-all picture. It isn’t about the individual flavors of religion- it’s about the system of religions. A system of wealth has the same effects "separating" man from his own kind. It’s about deceit and allowing others to fool using low systems and methods like religion’s and wealth a low form of government. Those who write laws and you who follow them – like playing monopoly and you the monopoly man doesn’t have limits he does a s he desires- while the other players are LIMITED restricted. The only possibly way to win in this system offered is to NOT PLAY at all. Eventually this system becomes so corrupted it causes man to become a prisoner of laws he freely accepts written for him. That’s its design - that’s what it does over long periods of time- that’s religions- simply follow the many thousands of years of bloodletting killing for god or faith. Faith IS NOT KNOWING so it isn’t an option for ANY RELIGION- it’s required for the religion to survive- offering absolutely no evidence – a blind trust is required not an option. Over 4000 religions all making the same claim in man’s record of history and this causes quite a stir in a low mind.

0

Undo

Gab (unregistered) 24.05.2012 21:52

There are twenty eight conflicts and border wars in the world involving repressive Islamic regimes.  
Muslims, unfortunately, are at odds with just about everybody- Muslim Shiites against Sunnis in Pakistan, Muslims against Hindus in India, Muslims against Christians in Nigeria, Muslims against Buddhists in Thailand, Muslims against Copts in Egypt, Muslims against Jews in Israel, Muslims against Christians the Philippines, Aceh (Indonesia), Kosovo (Serbia), Muslims against Maronites in Lebanon, Muslims against Hindus in Bangladesh, Muslims against Russian Orthodox, Muslims against Greek Cypriots, Muslims against non-Arab minorities in the Sudan, Muslims against Zoroastrians and Baha'i in Iran......

+1

Undo

Osman hussein ahmed 04.03.2012 20:31

Really it is obvious to do such that america and israel they are making aggresive to muslim countries we remember what happened to iraq, libya and arab countries so america will be down and islam will live peacefully (if allah say)

+4

Undo

View all comments (43)
Add comment

By posting your comment, you agree to abide by our Posting rules

Log in to comment in full, or comment anonymously under character-limit restriction.

100 Text

– required fields

Register or

Name

Password

Show password

Register

or Register

Request a new password

Send

or Register

To complete a registration check
your Email:

or Register

A password has been sent to your email address

Edit profile

Name

New password

Retype new password

Current password

Save

Cancel

Follow us